^ •• • ' f i t ; *1 . • • t ' ^ ' f *{•*"! *« * . - * . ' • : - « ' • } " : : • ' ' • • • : • • - . ' . • : • : • • ; • - : : flBRARt ltci.it. rc: SkiCs BOZEMAN beaumcnt 1975 Submitbed to the School of Architecture aa partial fulfillment of the rsquirements for the decree of Bachelor of Architecture at Montana State University, Bczemn, Montana, June, 1975. Vinl c special thanks to: Dr. Ifan Payne, Professor, MSU School of Architecture Mr, Kenneth Clark, Director, Montana Educational Television, (KMPT) Mr. Thomas Jenkins, Chief Engineer, KMPT Without -whom this project would not have been possible. TABIE OF CONTENTS Introduction Thesis Statement ..... ,. . ,. . 1 Public Television History* 2 Explanation.,.. . 3-4 Concept. 5-10 Project 11-22 Site 23-27 Space Programming 28-52 Additional Notes 53 INTRODUCTION This thesis project resulted from two different stimuli. First, a philosophy about my design experiences that developed while in school, and second, an area of design (functiorialism) I felt I would benefit greatly from but of -which I had had limited experience. Throughout my five years at this school, I have repeatedly seen (and admittedly used) design elements that I feel were some­ what "cliched" in the architectural field. These "cliches" seemed to pop up indirectly extensively in magazines, books, photographs, etc., and I felt had great influence, again indirectly, upon the architectural student. This while not necessarily being bad or negative, oftentimes became rather redundant. I felt a need to attempt working in an area of more "functionalistic" design, where perhaps more thought could be given such design elements. By working with a "functional" approach (in a broad sense), I hoped to 3ee that the product could be good architecture, without "deadly" functionalism. The terra "functional" (in the broad sense I use it) should not only deal with the workings of a building, but also the people within...a humanistic functionalism. To deal with functionalism as I see it, I felt it would also be to my advantage to take on a project of which I had little knowledge. By talcing this approach, I hoped to keep preconceived ideas to a minimum, thus leaving less room for "cliches." i'ESIS STATEMENT: A DESIGN FOR A FACILITY WHICH DUSES A TECHNICAL PROCESS CAT FIRST RELATIVELY f N O W N T O T H E D E S I G N E R ) A N D I T S W O R K I N G E N - RONMENT, DICTATES TO THE DESIGNER AN ADDED V1PHASIS UPON FUNCTIONALISM. CRAIG BEAUMONT 1975 \ THESIS STATEMENT A design for a facility which houses a technical process (at. first relatively unknown to the designer) and its -working environment, dictates to the designer an added emphasis upon functionalism. The project chosen is a center for public broadcasting, housing a Public Broadcasting System (PBS) television outlet, and a Na­ tional Public Radio (NPR) Station (both of which I had little knowledge). The facility houses radio and television production, relaying and administration. The project was chosen in part because of the establishment of PBS (Educational Television) in Montana (particulaly Bozeman). Working with the staff at Montana Educational Television (KMPT), the project became a theoretical solution for a facility for KMPT in a very real sense. The staff allowed me a great deal of their time, and were instrumental in "educating" me in radio and tele­ vision and their workings. In a sense, the programming stage became a crash educational phase. In addition to the help from the KMPT staff, I visited several large telecommunication centers in the Seattle and Spokane areas, talked and corresponded with several architects experienced in the field of TV and radio facility design, and read everything I could find on the subject. (A limited amount of research material is readily available.) PUBLIC TELEVISION Brief History: 1%9 - FCC considering advising channels for non-commercial educational television 1951 - Educational TV channels established by FCC 1952 - 242 station channels set up for exclusive use of educational television Ford Foundation created the Educational Television and Radio Center (later NET) 1953 - The nation's first educational TV license issued to U of Texas, Houston (KUHT) 1953-1961 - ever 6l educational licenses granted by FCC 1962 - Congress passes the Educational Broadcasting Facilities Act of 1962, initially authorizing $32 million for use nationally over a five year period By 1966 - over 125 non-commeriial educational broadcasting sta­ tions on the air 19b7 - Carnegie Commission on Educational Television reports, stimulating the Public Broadcasting Act of 196?, es­ tablishing 1.) $3# million for construction of facil­ ities across the country, and 2#) Establishing the Corporation for Public Broadcasting Service (CPB) 1969 - CPB with elected television representatives create the Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) 1973 - Three separate public television licensee groups merge to form a new, non-profit membership corporation retaining the name PBS^ N Explanation: Public or educational broadcasting should be interpreted in the broadest possible sense. It has been generally agreed to in­ clude: formal and informal education, community service, cultural affairs, a public forum, a training laboratory, recreational ser- 2 vice and minority programming. Public broadcasting is much more than "television free of advertising," it is an alternative to commercial broadcasting. It reaches out to touch the "widest por­ tion of the nation's interest groups, regardless of size. Whether it bp an opera by local residents or a national production dealing with automobile safety, public broadcasting is there for the people. Participation is the name of the game, -whether watching, listening or acting. Public broadcasting receives it3 support from state and fed­ eral funding, grants from corporations and non-profit organiza­ tions, and from private contributions from the public in general. Figures by the A.C. Nielsen Company show the PBS evening programs 3 are viewed in 27 million (U0,7%) U.S. homes. In the 1973 Montana Legislature, a committee to study edu­ cational television was appointed. J5ontana, (one of two states without a PBS outlet) seemed assured" to be the 49th state to have PBS. However, the 1975 Legislature discontinued funding and as of this writing, PBS in the form of KMPT-1975 appears dead, with the only surviving hope being private sponsorship to make it eligi­ ble for HEW funding. Had 3tate funding continued, the project, as done in this thesis, would have been a possible reality in in approximately ten years. Having lost state funding, Montana will probably be lucky to have a facility of this size in the next fifteen years. Leaving the controversial political issues aside, it is im­ portant to reiterate at this point, a key principle in public broadcasting, PBS and NPR are for the people. They are supported by the people, watched and listened by the people and in most in­ stances, are accessible for participation (from volunteers to ex­ ecutives) by the people. Public broadcasting is making the most of our most powerful mediums. ' M UlLDING WITHIN A. BUILDJNfi". \ _ xU mw,awu VT7-M UTT A i h PIWT y\ ! KTSN-K ffrxc?*- SUtf^ J SJM! "X&ST| lA-senrarrz i^i^ ./ >••' •• .h-,,. ,'"„ ,ir 2. ••'•It 'ti'.. -... T-yr-TTr-^ - . | j - , ' , . . ' . . ' f - r | j ^ ^ | - . | ' ' - - I I I l - 1 1 - 1 ' * * * - * * . 1 • • 1 ' 1 . 1 * . M , • ' - - 1 , , E/TBNiN, W&V& Df/vl^ Nje, wmcjc v '<•• <*-! &t>., e) A^s?:, Noic-s ,S/SOTI S2> ^ (5) I THE CONCEPT Through the study of required and de3ired in a broadcasting facility, I came to the conclusion (surprisingly early in my study), that 1 was working with a "building within a building." The building houses production facilities for television and radio (from sound studios to darkrooms to set construction areas), transmission equipment and administrative areas (offices, etc,,). This makes for a high degree of variation in physical, environmental and atmospheric needs. For instance, a television production studio has very critical sound and lighting require­ ments not found in any other part of the facility. Therefore, certain functions within the building are much more critical when natural and manmade environmental factors (affecting TV production studios) are accounted for. Some parts of the production areas therefore, become the "building within the building." Another point that was heavily considered....The people working within this center are very creative, highly skilled professionals. I have attempted therefore, to work at this project with an at­ titude of creating areas and spaces conducive to helping all em-~ ployees and volunteers to work at their optimum level. Admittedly, a very hard problem to work with or judge; I felt, nevertheless it fit into my definition of "functional", if it was to be re­ garded in the broadest sense of the 'word. "The Building Within a Building" The concept was approached in two manners; the exterior and the intorior. Sound studios for both radio and television (6) require a site that isn't overly noisy (See site section) first of all. After such a site is located, there will still be a con­ cern for externa], noise protection in the studios. The problem was dealt -with by buidling the less "noise-critical" areas around the noise sensitive areas. This literally makes a building within a building for acoustic purposes. The exterior offices, lounge, etc., act as a "sound-lock" for the studios. This, together with putting part of the production below grade, solves the problem of unwanted light transmission. Light is available for office and lounge areas, where it is more desireable, but is cut off before it reaches studio areas. This then appears to be the logical and most efficient means of protecting studio (light and sound) space. The interior approach puts the television studios at the center of the building, since most functions have a need for accessibility to the television studios (as well as radio studios, which work off the same access circulation routes.) The large area of the television studios and the use of concrete walls(for acoustic protection from external sources) make for a method of structuring the "outer" building from the concrete walls of the TV studios. The use of wood for the principle material for the "outer" building, and concrete for the "inner" building (together with its higher walls) accentuates the two building concept. An attempt to accentuate this even further is made by "cocking" the outer building at an angle to the studios. This makes for large open interior areas serving as flexible areas for secretaries and the large number of volunteers working within the center, for whom (7) individual officea become unfeasible. These flexible areas allow for a great deal of interaction among workers (employed and volun­ teers), important in a eonter such as this. While being less complex, the radio production area also demands a "building within a building." Due to acoustic and func­ tional requirements, in plan ti"ie "breaks into" the TV adminis­ trative area (which contrasts the studios by being "cocked"), and "complements" the studio area by following its general shape. Thus, while keeping within functional parameters, the radio area identifies within the building as having a different function, In a berime, the radio area begins to bo "a building within a buildi within a building." In concluding, with the taller freights of the studios, con­ trasting shapes and differing materials, the "building within a building" concept becomes evident both in interior workings and exterior visual experience. In attempting to work with an architectural solution affec­ ting people'3 work levels within the center, I chose to approach it through two directions: environmentally and more specifically, spacially. Spacially, the areas dropped in height from circulation areas (at fourteen feet) to personal offices (8 feet), with flexible/in­ teraction areas between these two areas. The rationale: Circulation Area-larger number of people are in this area at dif­ ferent times. The high space reflects the infcrmalness of the area. Also, functionally, higher space needed for moving of sets, equipment, etc. Large part3 of this are skylighted, so high space (8) effect is increased, and circulation marked by this. Flexible/Interaction Area Q.0-1/*. feet)-large numbers of people working in this area, and a great deal of activity. These area3 are not so intimate, but begin to bo more so than circulation. The higher spaces eliminate claustrophobic effect with 3.arge numbers of people, and stresses flexibility. Personal Offices-These areas become much more intimate and private. The scale of the spaces reflect this. Summing up, the higher spaciality reflects less formal, "looser" atmosphere, and the lower spaces, a more intimate setting. * A note about the "flexible" areas. As mentioned earlier, these spaces offer an interaction area for the staff, as well as a work area for volunteers and secretaries. Each volunteer and secretary would have his/her desk and space for their own micro- environment (where tackboard, partitions, etc. may be erected). The space would be loosely structured, and appear a3 the flexible space it is. Environmentally, I approached the facility in two ways: the use of natural light wherever possible, and the use of natural materials and elements. In an office situation, proximity to natural fcight is pre- U ferred to any other convenience. With this in mind, I attempted to allwo natural light (with the use of skylights, windows and clerestory) in every area that will tolerate it (there are a large number of areas, i.e. master control, editing, studios, that re­ quire a high degree of exacting artificial light variation and (9) will not tolerate the use of ratural light), Most of these areas (tolerating natural light) are on the second level, including administrative areas, lounge/interaction, set construction, and circulation. Areas not tolerating natural light were programmed for lower level use. Because much of the work within this center is done under "artificial'5 conditions (lighting, sound, production), and the use of concrete for the central (and very massive) area, I felt the need for the use of natural materials wherever possible. The building surrounding the concrete studies is a wood frame building (with lower level being below grade five feet, and "birmed up" with earth for five feet). The structure is basically wood (ex­ posed). In addition, there are a large number of planted areas (formal and non-formal). These natural elements are used as hu­ manizing elements and for environmental quality. They are intended to ease a person out of the artificial world of the studios, and into the fceal, less intense atmosphere of the rest of the center. Conceptually, I have attempted to keep within the theme of functionalism and yet humanize the spaces within the center to a point where they will begin to motivate the user of the facility to his maximum performance level. To sum up this second portion of the concept, I have attempted to bring to the activity, a scale suitable for that activity (keeping within functional parameters) with the uso of environment, spaciality, material and environmen­ tal quality controls. THE PROJECT The Center an a Ba.3c The Center for Public Broadcasting proposed within this the­ sis would be a base for all Public Broadcast facilities in the stste. The first transmitter site would bo on XL Heights in Butte, Montana, with an eventual second transmitter in Billings, Montana, Sometime in the future, stations would probably operate out of Missoula and Billings (with the Bozeman facility remaining the base). Various National Public Radio outlets station would pro­ bably also arise, probably in larger urban areas and universi­ ties and colleges (outlets exist now in Missoula, Bozeman, Helena, Butte and Billings). These would also base at the center in Bozeman, At the present time, PBS service is only available to Mont- anans by cable television service from surrounding states. At the writing of this text, there are at least three productions about Montana and its people, by out-of-state PBS licensees, in the working stages. With the advent of a Montana Center for Public Broadcasting, productions in Montana would be handled by Montana PBS. These productions would be classified into two broad categories: 1.) "In-House" productions - These productions would be made in the studios of the center (two TV production studios and two radio studios, with room allocated for one more). Produc­ tions might include, for example, local theatrical groups and singing groups, agricultural education programs, and local political roundtables. 2.) Remote-unit productions - These productions would bo filmed "on the spot" with the aid of a remote unit vehicle, housing the necessary production equipment to get the live action on fi3m. Productions might include news reports, human interest program­ ming and documentaries. In addition to local productions, regular programming brought through national PBS programming (such as "Sesame Street" and "Electric Company") is aired throughout the day and evening, keeping what would probably be an 18-hour broadcasting day, seven days a week (perhaps 24-hour for radio.) All the programming therefore is dependent upon the produc­ tion and administrative facilities of both the radio and tele­ vision master control (which keeps the picture on the air) will be in operation for a minimunrof 18 hours of scheduled time. Ob­ viously, the functions in the amount of time involved make for a rather complex yet exciting atmosphere. The functioning center: In dealing with the functional make-up of the facility, I first broke down the radio and television functions. Though simi­ lar in some respects, they have little in conmon when high degrees of tolerability are confronted. For example, the sound require­ ments for a television studio, while quite critical, are somewhat less critical for a radio studio. Therefor, I will work with the two different categories. -LATIONSHIPS ' Jif\Z,c TDL-SVI _EILM ep.EAKPCWM: riDgNri/*L, rusuo C A H A T I N C O U N T M i l G I O U N O i x-ff y « i 1 H fij R ! .L1j;L)J AlR'f UW7'M' p „ innn ~ir •nGpr Bub i , r,n/ K 1H1—!i—in onoLczOi pnnn I'r-UIJ L 11 Jt r ~ " l A ' 1 - 1 : ! > - ? XMOCLiG v si* nfroni ••• ann mrnar icx^eoe i^ QGunnnczjC—h- f i r i.cnnc ]••• ;rir i' t ;r. :~r i ^•••Qaacnn / / . - — LJLJL • u ••• DGCD m ' J L « y •••••a S U N S E T H l t L S •L • --T'. 1 N O M I N A S T i t t u o i v t m i t r ]•• ]•• f! 1 - 9 JDC ••[... JDoDnS r3D2 •Gona XX rnn TTT- I L Ud ./I , •or/ c •[ • / V U O t t A N A O R T I C * N O I (25) u A Z-J-21 ^ J i '/.-fT 'J 0 !IE_ w-- /^5A ti&?r CP II4 A *KlTfc>AU /vp-ISA fon. KVAiT';K- TAtl £ AND f=t>(/.;4:?AT\C\ J HATlT-IM- ' €>W*' f/ATf-P- TAEt^ - WToX. 10 - Nz&s APS* SPACE KaoH (;i) RJNC I ION 4. ^ virc-Cr AI FOfs TRLevl.-|.5H PH^DU^TIcM.r^T-r^P^TI^S EDlTlSM^H: iP K|XiS<2 ^WTI^l ,rjvjl-T|Pl-£ r:<06PAbl5 . EQUIPMENT <-a* L I G H T I N G I L L - L E V E L ! \ < ? f " 0 - - ] o o f C - i £ g < ? p P l l t ^ g f - U 3 I N I M f f R 9 f > ^T'/IPlOv" i Kjtf|S.TE?f?. ACD:"5.SAL L!<£t"|Ti! «2> ACOUSTICS v&pr h3-, vest w reveR80v 0.5 , >)H A^pTW < ' ' ' MATERIALS ~jxOC'^A^\y Tl-T; < bS O £g| JSy TII-&I&RPET. WIV.-W/?h6H2.TAL r^SL/.VINTL r'^ gU-.PMSPlt?PANEU. SCHEMATIC LAYOUT , t\T. SPACE ^sifr^L. FUNC1 ION CENTRAL r?J0WTK;:-: G\- T'V EQUIPMENT ^WiTirt!^ 6'o^^u.^, Pir-a^r^R.'^ ^e^K.vioiso I>-PB Psa>p.PEPs6 (y: p.). i etec-iN'e , ,Mpk' SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA wo? s£?.Fr CLG. HI. e'-o' LIGHTING ^NT^uusp ib AV t--STAL. rA-Ksu ,^ visstf^ ax., w 'w.T^HlSs' p" vAgttt >Ph\ Q: £5 t_tr Q J , i J. 0 £ 4 £ * >YJ j fl^ xiMiTf r° hLl R4?CMcf|ffJ ^TATIr^ ADDI i IONAL NOTES *0Nrs^-u£u ph-st,TBurpf-Kuf^Q, HMKliPrry SPA.CE Ts'-svi^ ps1 FUNCTION p-s^v r^i^ H EQUIPMENT L-!£-HT TfV^. LAB U6HT& 'UW R?&r-8epAnWf&6&!»y tji&H rpx.-f n;,-:; GWfhWs) MAT ERIA L S a> pupp. -^aN^rg, m©. waua- KA^F-Yi !»S -^-2?tb K-^ us'I^ A:u) SCHEMATIC LAYOUT / C -aJii'n^v. FW>H 'SJVVV' /"V" ' ' .'N/V - W T - - P&UVS ^ 0H4 6 "Jfcf Ifr ADDITIONAL NOTES " SSI &S psXrjWTgP rf^ M A&Vg! SPACE FILM ^IR-'^HR FUNCT ION 6~\o• EQUIPMENT SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA, ^6'-O' LIGHTING ILL. LEVEL.; E<3F.<5- ACOUS1 ICS 6MI£T 2^^/ISPU>VCU)5&-TJ^PSKW^MWSJVCE: A^SPTPN - MATERIALS ;VRUS> • O W RECIR&PMM^I HMMWTT- SPACE FILM SPITIN5 FUNCTION eprrise EQUIPMENT E?itii^> «io gpni^ SPACE REQUIREMENTS HT. & - o 100 53 e», •=Ua>a.-Titg,^i<^£7E) iVwr-r^OfW-IS W/&vP'6P;A^H<7'I^ VlKfL- PAls'ELS SCHEMATIC LAYOUT xb. t - pjuH hcjw\1\i$ CX 7 4 & ADDITIONAL NOTES afurh'^u.s* S PA C E P|UK/TAf 2 LI BS/* F>T FUNC I ION <"r* FIL-K I ci^ MUrT'^ STOfV '^ EOU IP M E N T fi-m 'ta^S SPACE REQUIREMENTS 5£<3 Ft T. 8-.0" LIGHTING ILL. UV&i ^ f-o. ?<35^iK-S K^rWJVC U&tfriN^HS PcMaste |N UBpAfcf ACOUSTICS <3UISJ BfvJ^XjSD UL-VgL ,*? -fj 42", IAV ^vEF-BEfv-TPN, 1406., MATERIALS a ilLlHs>- ,^Wf-T> TILB ,<*TPBD • FUs^^AWBrriWS, Wril^ -^YP -D ; l-VAT R\S5UM*> -PIIPA&U5 SljSrT^ SCHEMATIC LAYOUT F, ,t=rt n^nUTfioriUM ^4 mtuity TA &>'-[? r 0 I 1 cu=ti ADDITIONAL NOT«hmhipitt S PA C T &N'5! N£5| ^\-PY FUNC ! ION WX &< 1C'6~ F SSV^IK O? ^MLMSMR^T^^E CP MAI^SAH^L- &?WIRM=S" EOUIPMEN I W^YES^FI . VAC^C- TXPUT- R?P.PR: A ATW>^GL6^TPPSP B^MIP, TB5T vqa\ ?\-\0r (&ciiu>6#apr*,Vl.7~t'pT&-*. KWLTRH&TCPJEF^O PUESR" 5? RSS^C-E SA^--R, SPACE REQUIREMENTS £6LAHT.TRT' L IGHTING P,^35 F^L <5TAS5. ACOUS1 ICS ^ISIC^SW-INT)UJVSU.FCY-TF^UNN3VT2«ER^ M«VEMBST . Wi^ 'Nss MAT B5|H Trl5 rU***. IH lVA<^« hZos&CPFrfF^AgLE;') SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA CLG. HT. 605 541 pr |0'-C" LIGH I IN G ILL, LLVSL: |pf£. (Mor.KtfD - |»f-£ Ll^riT N?fl>&> A^'tJ WWS6 - j ^ Tn go. .W05 pAh'SUl# SCHEMATIC LAYOUT - T - f : 4 — — | — • M51 * ' 3 MhJlTIAL S?-<7' L 7i 1 1 • w* • 1—fv r * vn •V— 3 1 1 1 b : *«={= !® ADDITIONAL NOTES WIF^Y/AT^ P rvt^N^S PMc^.fW, ASC ^MT '^.vsMTIUATIfH ,Tasc r^y; T^N I^NAL !^ SPACE rsus^sETSP-kiha- FUNCTION £<3NTMSi CoV¥r[>; MO\e>/V>ZV&W*tl6MI&>l0H fetWIPHENT EQUIPMENT t=L EPM^SIE' t skk ;KJAL. SPACE REQUIREMENTS LG. 'HT.S^1' LIGHTING (jfttinkMMCt) tfop-?. Ll&tr F&> KMHres^ita?- V^K. ACOUSTI CS l^mSMSUt '„F2V£U106 '47dB) UWpe^P»ef tAr>»i , I ?— jus,LI toLeur^ walw- nv^s w/^fr-^ S C H E M A T I C L A Y O U T rN>*iN|irf 10 i tf=t I T u 4'*0* S I, ~ L - -- >1 ^ < --i x I ' < I cr 1 x L ' j / V X 7F \ =± 4'-s" ^|ims w t 1 4 ADDIl IONAL NOTES WIP.B/7AY* ^EXTWWPI457s , R0°F 4 H/i<'1 up- ccw&eu SPACE FUNCTION Piurt* PRIM7£ EOUIPMENT rf^sssiNas TANK-v, PILH PSSIAgstN^eR,- primt^ TK/-T6 C'lief< P£V£L£plt«le5 and PRINTS SHIPMENT- SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA I oo6Qpc, CLG. HT. &'-o" LIGHTING ILL.Ui-JSl: .| fA'tfif* , Vf.&WU; U"VSL ACOUSTICS u=\;gu,55-Tl^&, uwf-gvewfFArifN, i^c.j tiPCBf-ATB tt^ NTPS- MAT ERIA LS ; ?i^-Tiu5,<*w*eie. WAo«-<5tPga,vif4rL. P/\N!C|.$ <^eiys> 3 WM-s - ^ •ponit^H/'&Le^Lip.F/^e'j SCHEMATIC LAYOUT CI cipnH s P l Ug+tT C IWlKil^ f "nui ^ TMI3S-r 0 1—: I f ! 1 ADDITIONAL NOTES uem-io^ ^ST^U-SP ovicr, rstfrer^ TviPs, HviHi^ irf^ r^ iAi. SPACE <$£T AS'P FUNCTION SBT ^hKT^^TI^i^ASPPSTPt,^^ ^ -JfC'^ Ase op uAS^S •S£T'S t? "FIATO" ^<'£p IH TV Pf?:0vA^b|4- (J^pfSSTPT' E^UIPM-K'T P^STIH® .e'6 ) ^6TRl|£1 ION OF 6ET&. SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREAi |T 2>6^o^Fr LLC). H I. p'-o" f-|isi. LIGHTING ILL. LLV&: ec? f -0. ["NUfVC U t^iTlM ^ pJU6riT0V TASK" U6t\Tlti& EX WASLS L|6H'flN6 ACOUSTICS LAO LEVgL, 56-35 dB, MEDIUM PeVEFBE^TW, |-a«£j p|32SfMB /-•e^cp-noN MAT ERIA L S o^x\^ - &-(?. ?D, , ^ R^sd, FL^-^^TE 1NMLS- MM T^, 6rp Ba SCHEMATIC LAYOUT Wfeftr--) s&r ^H-ST^TI^ SI <3P v :ST •STZx^ti •' 4 •l£> \ 7 Hf4 ,\? A DDI! IONAL NOTES £vir C^U^LS pa?f«w Tf'-^USP LSvt'L .&&-«? dB, HSDtqH *&te*&Zf&r}0)t, )•£&%•, Ypx?*' g . MAT E RIA LS ^aun-f-^p bp-jAUT? , W.LW- MA^PY, CCYV.V&Vc SCHEMATIC LAYOUT k- ----- y • -• — " V n r \ r t • ; Fe-^TE HSi r 1 i —\ a V . DooY* _ \ ^Hirt t> /M 0 114 4H: ADD IT ION A L NOTES ^asa^S AK-SA , i-»wss H^S*l I? ^K^nnbl A >'•=••-;:• re HA^TCf-^-SlT^UiCTMDK? C^SJTf^U fWy|-> t CI'WPI-"^. A^&so (=i?f4. PI5UIVE, " f'SAK HMITlN<& AKP LIGHTING m.L9«. : |£f.£. (wjfirta| ), |?: f,Cu(m&iKilituvl)( Pc6S\irUi NA7i:F/M- LOV5L H?F- V^74Pi^ ^ i^TpW- PiALs . DiMMgF- ACOUSTICS ygftf fftiiET &\Jt^MtfDLBV£L UW ^fVe.RBepATE'M Hl6ti ^ OfCfTi^ MA T E RIA LS ^ BIUN^ BP. jR/efWApper ., \NML6-hcm6':o I'lSTM-fH i£Ls VINYL PWEL6 6I6NAL SPACE REQUIREMENTS SCHEMATIC LAYOUT /K rraxfsTWJ $TMW3 O ^AST, M?K. T T T T t 4 ADDITIONAL NOTES SPACE -STUPli? FUNCTION EQUIPMENT SPACE REQUIREMENTS ^aht 423 • Hl^l MATERIALS ^jwj^bp-Ifu^-iu^I VlsV- f^ SEL ,^ -VAV.IZtfWS '^lAtep®F-' iwe-tfE '^ SCHEMATIC LAYOUT =3 <£LA£? cWTf^L Nxv Vo^ Y 0 t 4 Ifo ftH ADDITIONAL NOTES SPACE r h>,'? interview «WK> FUNCTION ^ iMrefviei"/ Fr^DW^^i E Q U I P M E N T 7 a k . B / O , y . ^ ^ p s i s s S P A C E R E Q U I R E M E N T S .. . 'ZpOP U>. fUKf,- ^ Pf&TiTlUE. l A / A . L L ^ - ^ e T M P ^ B b & . V l W L B ^ S U C - , f U ^ T S p e p t T W B W f U - S C H E M A T I C L A Y O U T _-jr S' _?SMNP L ~ Ti ,+I V| » \ t, 1 .-•• i r • t ,v, t ' l c ® J \ VISUAL CC#TrOl 'Nf / cotiwi n*?N[ 0 *- I * ifr — A D D I T I O N A L N O T E S . ^ • • A ^ - l o o ^ ( \ M . 5 C z w ? m ] ' o . ACCCVPVr\Z> TA&UOv) • n- SPACE FUNCTION a Hp r-eve lament op new-? gciT^N/^i EQUIPMENT T5LSTTfB, P05K -y\^TAE>US , P|UHs ^ ItteT SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA &> <3 CLG. HT. v-a LIGHTING ILL.U5V5L: -%> -14? £ -, FL^-as^mytue WAU^ -i&YP eP-j^ H^ TI^ M-Ul'-Tl^ Ta? W#D SCHEMATIC LAYOUT . FTWlHlTr"^ pk' i — O. b ADDITIONAL NOTES (i3) SPACE * T,^P£ USPv^fcf FUNCTION OF^T/ife,i|^woi^^if^uuATiH^ u E , Wrll^ - YVitJP RKMBUU&'&ff- ®7- - PW^3t-B S C H E M A T I C L A Y O U T • ppxiM'TTT0 /l^dcNTPO- FH 4 * - F5&PV -14.r1t.iTT TAf^EJ V at 0 I £ 4- f=tJ=t A DD IT I ON A L N OT ES aanmjLst? HM^IPITY as? TE^rsrvWE (M) ;zi. SPACE EKkSiSlSSS.!^ HA:S'T&HAH^& FUN CI ION prx ~c«r & f&fh\p- P>A<5E *F MAI STE-H ANcJE KMlPMEk'T EOUIPMEN I yvb^<.E>& t^f.v-,<«/K c%>|LL-A1£fSrbcsg-MP CW^k?S KET&P-, AH? otHSf5- A«N ,(-^-- f^OpepATE; MATERIALS 6SIUti#-,\tfA4Tl6 TILg.^ YT PP-1 PL»f^ -TlE£-A&X> fhNELIflf' T hjsviitfeNT L-A^r- E^VIIPMEHT SPACb TfV^ -MlTTBI^ AND t4f FUNLI ION <^>NTAINS AW TSA^MK^N e^mrMBh't EQUIPMENT TFAN«MITTC!z.|rt?Dl|>TI^H M3NlTE^,Ff^WEMs*f i-bc-lrrgp-, /-•XT^ MATED TA^ -nAti?fVF-fe^ poE^ wNir SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA CLG. HT. &-(? LIGHTING ILL. LSVSL : ii>f-6 6wr.}ul')t |a?f.£. 'iwism/tf?) - ACCURAL 9fM<5ttTNf®S NticDei; ovarii? j/NNTfNAtes ACOUSTICS #U IBT BAif^WhP L&/eU,^-t7d&, LOU[^gfmv^T!^|htef^Nfe MATERIALS 6E!1.IH^ -A^ wTI£' TIU&i , PUi^ s.-TIL£,^ t^5ns WrU4-#tF jja ,v\(w r^ euMs, SCHEMATIC LAYOUT . „ fP-CXlMlTf P MA^ r^ T^l^ t. 3 Cf^ I BUY 1(4 4WV1B /f-BS> j?" :>i \ r TF^ ftyl y \ TTefs • ;r- - >t r T pVITVif^ B h'A^^reD &?H|P jr^ " I i. I M f Ebf=feiJ ADDITIONAL NOTES wr£*ikpt> EXT^fslOFv c»^4, 'L ptvyic, m n SPACE LISTENS FUNCTION EQUIPMENT T'-i.^ TA&LEjAfs SPACE REQUIREMENTS VS. "HT. LIGHTING III. LEVELHATLsIV-L - |=U7^P&<3StfTm-fM. ACOUSTICS VEP-t JjUlE2-T LEVEL- -••£?- 5t? Ba^-PO («*)&&> MBTAL cf^ vji^ YL-i^ v f^Wei^ i flap-- */*?&.' ,TIUB ,wM -^A^WALu SCHEMATIC LAYOUT - "S-T r^s^e ,^ p-E,\. rzx o O i l 4 tt ADDITIONAL NOTES f^iea: ,;AMSJ&XA^U&" F^. eYPAH&ie ,^ SPACE ' FUNCTION PA(7|0 S^mfKE-HT ^T^F-A^E EQUIPMENT ^riEtp ^ hce A6 t^gEt/EC SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA <500 B,xrMS|£N0 SCHEMATIC LAYOUT / L. H. 4 . i£ i^ Tstw^ 1 \ if h"' tf- D I M b —r \G ADDITIONAL NOTES P^l&UB "AMMEXA&UE" SfA^g fiOf*. flfTH^E eTW 4 f'eLATt:^ SPACE assewfts. fV!EU€Ittf^6B FUNCTION 0O\\TAI!^ S^B^EN^T ^eHgpATI^M &iS?HiPf*i&NT A-HD F^EU EOUIPMENT PlBSAL-fSWE^B!? SPACE REQUIREMENTS AREA i5<5 4».pr CLG. HT. &-(f LIGHTING IIL.LBVSL! fepNSWf- &f p^-TAEUeLl^l$\\\& (jccf^i) ACOUSTICS ^x^pyrei-T r^t j -n- ?& i^-jscuM ^evef-ee^-T^n, i-1.5 , l^ w /\e*?*iH EMN A- ACOUS1 ICS R,v^^^Lfvp^147-5^#)u''ivm'E)S5^A-a&H, i^. MAI ERIALS ozv^'humv^^^T-^-) VYR.LS- VANfl FA^a.^ 0ff; pD. ,)AtW F^B'-II^ ' SCHEMATIC LAYOUT -I I D AM. > \ . / \ ' \ \=4 p=zzj. I—L T=-|L . / ADDITIONAL NOTES N4 SPACE FUNCTION iff? t^ gcrTlfJ^ v.TY FfV',0 '~P\ffi\0\l E OU IP M E N1 ^Hrf3Z£t&& w_e A^D £rjAI>-51 TV t'pWTZr^, TAfS pE^CfC?^ , P/.MTAEtK SPACE REQUIREMENTS ^HT.ET" LIGHTING iLL. LtbVSL; Dlj-IMffS flMUfVi. US^Ng" ACOUS I ICS Q-II&T UVs:f^Vem^qW,l rjitftf f&crfY'/M MATERIALS CMlWo-M0m\6 TlUP , FLa^-^AfPBT iWAU^-WW JHlEl-lH^ FAe^ u -uwepea ew. SCHEMATIC LAYOUT s V- •X o x: QQQu feljq . PRiKirr P .. Off \0z0 0 1 t a Tft 6 •• 16 ADDITIONAL NOTES SPACE ioi-f ftspwNTiNe FUNCTION tut|v/if4g> AND WAITI!^ EQUIPMENT f&enicfic&*.i4frir4lrynv peu^wk- MKKSft SPACE REQUIREMENTS •%KXSM'-T- . 0-©" LIGHTING IH. LEVEL- f/>. NW-H- A * ffJStfF . ACOUS FICS HW-^TELTt'o&X U&s/EL,41'5t?4&,UW rtrn WfrcH MA FERIALS V-lhUfi-^WO p/^ BUf^ YPBR,RWs>-^ 'B ^ SCHEMATIC LAYOUT ^ P / x t ! t= r $?£ J ' •> ' v 1 Vv-^ V . . ^ V v : . f / H=f ADDITIONAL NOTES FOOTNOTES 1 PBS Factsheet, PBS, (June, 1974), p# 2* 2 Capital Constuction Project. KOTS, University of Wash­ ington, (August, 1974), pp. 8-10. ^ PBS Factsheet, PBS, (June, 1974), p. 4 ^ Kenneth Johnson, "Office Environment People Prefer(ALA. Journal), (February, 1970), p. 57* BIBLIOGRAPHY Burris, Meyer. Harold & Goodfriend, Lewis S. Anountics for the Architect. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp., 1957. Doolie, Leslie L. Environmental Acoustics. New York: McGraw- Hill Book Co., 1972. Etkin, Harry A. AM/FM Broadcast Station Planning Guide. Tab Books, 1970. Finnegan, Patrick S. Planning the Local UHF-TV Station. New York: Ilayden Book Co,, 1965. Harris, Cyril M. & Knudsen, Vern 0. Acoustical Designing in Ar­ chitecture. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1950* Johnson, Kenneth. "Office Environment People Prefer." AIA Journal, February 1970. Lang, Jon; Burnette, Charles; Moleski, Walter, & Vachon, David. Desipninr Tor Human Eehavior. Pennsylvania: Doublen, Hut­ chinson & R03S, Inc., 1974. Ryeder, Sharon. "Process Planning". Progressive Architecture, August, 1972. Small, Eric. "How an Architect Takes the Trouble Out of Station Building". Broadcast Management/Engineering, September, 1974. Teplitzky, Allan M. "Planning Broadcast Station Acoustics," Broadcast Management/Engineering, August, 1968. Winckler, Carlton. "Planning the Industrial Television Studio." Educational & Industrial Television, November, 1974. Capital Construction Project, University of Washington, KCTS, August, 1974. IE5 Lighting Handbook, Illuminating Engineering Society, 1947. Public Broadcasting Service Factsheet, PBS, June, 1974. .................. "Search for Status in Station Design," Broadcasting, May, 1969. \ % eTc^M ntz> PUSH \CfiTr. M i *fc JKV-i \rr ^s. J f™ Q'fnrrr M M