Lithostratigraphy and depositional setting of the limestone-rich interval of the Lahood Formation (Belt Supergroup), southwestern Montana by Adrienne Thornley Bonnet A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Earth Sciences Montana State University © Copyright by Adrienne Thornley Bonnet (1979) Abstract: The LaHood Formation crops out along a narrow east-west trending belt which coincides with the Willow Creek fault zone. This 3500 m thick arkose and arkosic conglomerate deposit contains a distinctive 400 m thick limestone-rich interval near the top. The limestone-rich interval crops out in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range and is similar to intervals in various stratigraphic positions in the formation of other areas. The limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation contains two types of depositional sequences which alternate and reflect mass flow and suspension deposition in relatively deep water. The arkose depositional sequences contain 25 m of undeformed arkose beds which range between 1 m and 5 m thick. The limestone-bearing depositional sequences are 30 m thick and contain both rhythmically and randomly interbedded limestone, siltstone, shale, and arkose in addition to intraformational slump structures. The arkose depositional sequences are interpreted as channel deposits of the lower-upper fan and middle fan of a submarine fan system. Arkose beds in these sequences are amalgamated, and contain rip-up and floating clasts of silt-stone, shale, and limestone; both normal and inverse graded bedding; and basal conglomerates. The limestone-bearing depositional sequences represent interchannel deposits of a submarine fan system. Small scale deformation features and their distribution in slump structures reflect opencast slump processes and include: plastically deformed septarian concretions, molar tooth structures, imbricate thrusts, and truncated decollement folds. The deformation reflects both faulting and bank undercutting by migrating distributary channels. The LaHood Formation geometry, lithologies, and association with fault zones which were probably active during the Precambrian together suggest fault-controlled deposition. The east-west fault zone may be related to the origin of the Belt basin as an abandoned rift arm or a transform fault zone. Northwest-southeast trending faults to the south of this zone may be secondary shear faults formed during transform movement and may also have influenced LaHood Formation deposition.  STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO COPY In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permis­ purposes may be granted by my major professor, or, in his absence, by the Director of Libraries. It is under­ stood that any copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. sion for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly Date / 3 /if/ ) / /^7 Signature _ ^ LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY AND DEPOSITTONAL SETTING OF THE LIMESTONE-RICH INTERVAL OF THE LAHOOD FORMATION (BELT SUPERGROUP), SOUTHWESTERN MONTANA by . Adrienne Thornley Bonnet A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Earth Sciences Approved: Chairl Head, Major DefoaJrtment GraduatevDean MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY . Bozeman, Montana November 1979 iTHESES 61,4 & iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Much gratitude is felt for the moral and other sup­ port provided by my parents, Dr. Donald Smith (advising), Sharon Dusenberry (typing), Cindy Farquharson (drafting), and Connie Zarndt throughout preparation of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES................. .................- , . v± INTRODUCTION............. ■.............. ............... I GEOLOGIC SETTING ....................................... 4 Location..................... 4 Modern Setting.............................. .. 4 Precambrian Setting . . . ................. . . . 6 LITHOSTRATIGRAPHY......................... ............. 9 Stratigraphy.............................. .. 9 Introduction........................... 9 Stratigraphy of the LaHood Formation . . . . 12 Stratigraphy of the Limestone-Rich Interval of the LaHood Formation ......... 15 Lithology...................................... 27 Introduction.......... 27 Description of Arkose........................ 27 Interpretation of Arkose ................... 32 Description of Carbonates. . ................ 42 Interpretation of Carbonate Beds ........... 46 Description of Siltstone and Shale ......... 57 Interpretation of Siltstone and Shale. . . . 58 SEDIMENTARY-TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION . . . . 59 Introduction............................ i . . . . 59 Previous Interpretations .................... 59 VPage Author's Interpretation. ; ................. 62 Sedimentary Environment of Deposition 67 Channel Deposits............. 68 Interchannel Deposits........................ 7 0 Tectonic Environment of Deposition............... 7 2 CONCLUSIONS......................................... . 7 8 APPENDICES A - K ............. ................. .. In The Packet vi LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure I. Distribution of LaHood Formation outcrops and lines of cross sections shown in Figure 3. ...................... 5 Figure 2. Tectonic elements of Belt basin and pre-Belt source area .................... 7 Figure 3. Cross sections of LaHood Formation and other Belt r o c k s ........................10 Figures 4a. 4b. 4c. 4d. Depositional sequences and features of arkose beds (photos)................... 16 Figure 5. Location and correlation of appended measured sections...................... . 18 Figure 6. Generalized stratigraphic sections of depositional sequences ................. 19 Figures 7a. 7b. 7c. 7d. Primary sedimentary and diagenetic features in arkose beds (photos) . . . . 21 Figures 8a. 8b. 8c. 8d. Stromatolites, concretions, and defor­ mation in carbonate beds (photos). . . . 24 Figures 9a. Deformation and diagenetic features in 9b. carbonate beds (photos)................. 26 9c. 9d. Figure 10. Submarine fan model 65 ABSTRACT The LaHood Formation crops out along a narrow east- west trending belt which coincides with the Willow Creek fault zone. This 3500 m thick arkose and arkosic conglom­ erate deposit contains a distinctive 400 m thick limestone- rich interval near the top. The limestone-rich interval crops out in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range and is similar to intervals in various stratigraphic positions in the formation of other areas. The limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation contains two types of depositional sequences which alter­ nate and reflect mass flow and suspension deposition in relatively deep water. The arkose depositional sequences contain 25 m of undeformed arkose beds which range between I m and 5 m thick. The limestone-bearing depositional sequences are 30 m thick and contain both rhythmically and randomly interbedded limestone, siltstone, shale, and arkose in addition to intraformational slump structures. The arkose depositional sequences are interpreted as channel deposits of the lower-upper fan and middle fan of a submarine fan system. Arkose beds in these sequences are amalgamated, and contain rip-up and floating clasts of silt- stone, shale, and limestone; both normal and inverse graded bedding; and basal conglomerates. The limestone-bearing depositional sequences represent interchannel deposits of a submarine fan system. Small scale deformation features and their distribution in slump structures reflect open­ cast slump processes and include: plastically deformed septarian concretions, molar tooth structures, imbricate thrusts, and truncated decollement folds. The deformation reflects both faulting and bank undercutting by migrating distributary channels. The LaHood Formation geometry, lithologies, and asso­ ciation with fault zones which were probably active during the Precambrian together suggest fault-controlled deposi­ tion. The east-west fault zone may be related to the origin of the Belt basin as an abandoned rift arm or a transform fault zone. Northwest-southeast trending faults to the south of this zone may be secondary shear faults formed dur­ ing transform movement and may also have influenced LaHood Formation deposition; INTRODUCTION The LaHood Formation of the Belt Supergroup (Pre- cambrian Y ) in southwestern Montana is a 3500 m thick wedge of arkose and arkosic conglomerate which contains a 400 m thick limestone-rich interval near the top. The limestone- rich interval studied in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range consists of two types of depositional sequences which alternate and may reflect lower-upper fan and middle sub­ marine fan processes and episodic faulting along the south­ ern margin of the Belt embayment. The LaHood Formation has been studied across the 130 km outcrop extent in varying detail. The studies in the limestone-rich interval of the formation involved details of deformation structures and characteristics related to the formation as a whole, such as thickness and stratigraphic position. Peale (1893) and Walcott (1899) described general characteristics of the coarse Belt rocks, including those in the limestone-rich interval, and recognized them as nearshore equivalents of the finer-grained Belt rocks to the north. In order to map the structure in the Whitehall area, Alexander (1955) measured and correlated sections. 2described the type section near LaHood Park, and .described the petrography of rocks in that area. Verrall (1955) described some lithologic features of the limestone-rich interval and mapped the distribution of outcrops as part of a larger mapping project in the Horseshoe Hills. McMannis (1963) was the first to measure sections of the formation throughout the extent of outcrops and describe the stratigraphy and lithology by area. In addition to defining the formation and indicating a principal refer­ ence section, McMannis (1963) referred to a limestone- rich interval, first recognized by Verrall (1955), as the "'molar tooth1 and algal zone". McMannis (1963) stated that this zone is the "only reasonable key horizon" and used it to correlate sections in the Bridger Range and Horseshoe Hills with each other and with other Belt rocks to the north. In an abstract, Hawley (1973) described characteristics of the formation and proposed that turbidity currents, sand flows, and submarine slides deposited sedi­ ment in a fault-bound basin adjacent to a rugged Precambrian crystalline source area. The only other reference to this limestone-rich interval was made by Hawley and Schmidt (1974) in a field guide. In order to propose a depositional system for the formation, Boyce (1975) measured sections 3throughout the extent of the outcrops and defined vertical and lateral facies changes, stratigraphic relationships to other Belt rocks, and petrographic trends. Although McMannis (.1963) and Hawley (1973) interpreted some of the paleogeographic conditions during deposition of the forma­ tion, Boyce (1975) was the first to design a detailed study with the intention of interpreting the environment of deposition. Trunk and Smith (1979) studied details of the molar tooth structures in the southern Horseshoe Hills and concluded these structures represent soft sediment deformation of cryptalgal laminites. Sections were measured by the author in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range limestone-rich interval in order to describe details of the stratigraphy and lithology and propose a sedimentary-tectonic environment of deposition. This paper attempts to show that (I) this interval may reflect processes and environmental conditions which were present throughout LaHood Formation deposition, (2) the two types of alternating depositional sequences represent channel and interchannel deposits on the lower-upper fan and middle fan segments of a submarine fan system, and (3) the deposits may also reflect episodic faulting along, the southern margin of the Belt embayment. 4GEOLOGIC SETTING Location The limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation crops out in southwestern Montana north of the East Gal­ latin River in the Horseshoe Hills and in Felix Canyon on the west side of the Bridger Range (Fig. I). Similar intervals crop out in the Highland Mountains (Thorson, J., 1979, oral commun.) and near St. Paul Gulch, north of Whitehall (Coppinger, W., 1979, oral and written commun.). The nearly continuous exposures along 6 km of the East Gallatin River in the Horseshoe Hills provide an oppor­ tunity to observe detailed lithologic and stratigraphic characteristics of the limestone-rich interval with little structural complication. The interval is well exposed in Felix Canyon; however, the geometry of the steeply dipping beds is difficult to discern in logging road cuts. Modern Setting The upper LaHood Formation crops out in a series of bevelled Laramide folds which plunge to the north in the Horseshoe Hills. Some faults with minor displacements cut the formation near the contact with the Cambrian Flathead Formation, but do not cut LaHood exposures along the East Gallatin River (Verrall,1955). 5THHEJ FORKS FIGURE la. Distribution of known LaHood Formation outcrops and loca­ tions of stratigraphic sections referred to in text under the heading Lithostratigraphy. Author's measured sections lie along the East Gal­ latin River in the southern Horseshoe Hills and in Felix Canyon, the Bridger Range. Modified from McMannis (1961). CWGlOERATlC IAHOOD IAHOOD HITH FINE-GRAINED INTERBEDS FIGURE lb. Lines of cross sections shown in Figure 3. W-W', Y-Y', and Z-Z' modified from McMannis (1963); X-X' modified from Alexander (1955). 6A normal fault on the west side of the Bridger Range places pre-Belt crystalline rocks against the LaHood For­ mation (McMannis, 1963). The LaHood Formation is finer- grained at the north end of the Bridger Range and the limestone-rich interval is unconformably overlain by the Cambrian Flathead Formation north of the North Cottonwood section (McMannis, 1963). Precambrian Setting The wedge of LaHood arkose and arkosic conglomerate was deposited along the southern margin of the Belt embay- ment, north of the pre-Belt crystalline rock source area (Fig. 2). An east-west trending fault zone, parallel to the present Willow Creek fault zone, probably formed the southern margin of the embayment and may have existed dur­ ing pre-Belt and Belt time (Harrison and others, 1974; Casella, 1979). This fault zone and the northwest- southeast trending faults to the south, probably influenced LaHood Formation deposition and may be related to the origin of the Belt basin. Theories regarding the origin of the Belt basin are: (I) subsidence in an epicontinental trough (Harrison and Reynolds, 1976; Harrison, J., 1977, oral commun.), and 7100 I 200 MI I 100 I 200 KM FIGURE 2. Tectonic elements of the Belt basin and the pre-Belt crystal­ line rock source area. LaHood Formation source area lies south of the Willow Creek fault zone. Modified from Harrison and others (197^). .8 (.2) faulting during initial stages of continental rifting (Harrison and others, 1974; Boyce, 1975). Subsiding epi­ continental troughs differ from rift arm basins because they form in stable tectonic environments and involve little or no structural control during development. Struc tural and stratigraphic■evidence support the concept of faulting and fault-controlled deposition along the south­ ern margin of the Belt embayment. Evidence and theories concerning the origin of the Belt basin will be discussed under the heading: Sedimentary-Tectonic Environment of Deposition. 9LXTHOSTRAT!GRAPHY Stratigraphy Introduction . The base of the LaHood Formation is covered.or in fault contact with pre-Belt crystalline rocks except for one depositional contact described by.McMannis (1963). According to Boyce (1975), this depositional contact is questionable and may be a weathered and sheared zone. The stratigraphic relationship between the LaHood Formation and other Lower Belt and Ravalli Group rocks is not fully known Most workers correlate the finer-grained upper portions of the formation with the Greysoh Shale of the Ravalli Group and lower, coarser portions with the Neihart Quartzite, Chamberlain Shale, and Newland Limestone of the Lower Belt (Fig. 3). The limestone-rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range is found in the upper LaHood For­ mation but is correlated with the Newland Limestone (McMannis, 1963; Boyce, 1975). Y' FIGURE 3. Cross sections located in Figure lb. W-W shows fining upward and northward and the wedge shape of the LaHood Formation; X-X' shows the correlation of the formation in the Whitehall area with the Greyson Shale of the Ravalli Group; Y-Y' shows the loca­ tion of fine-grained intervals and the interfingering with both coarse LaHood rocks and finer-grained Belt rocks; Z-Z' shows the stratigraphic position of the limestone-rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills and the Bridger Range. € = Cambrian; GS = Greyson Shale; LH = LaHood Formation; HT = Neihart Quartzite; P€ XLN = Precambrian crystalline rocks; NLS EQUIV = Newland Limestone equivalent; LS-RICH LH = Limestone-rich LaHood. H O 11 McMannis (1963, p. 417) referred to the limestone- rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range as the "'molar tooth' and algal zone' , and stated, "This appears to be the only reasonable key horizon within these sections, and serves to correlate across the 7-mile-wide covered area between these Belt exposures." Stratigraphic intervals similar to the limestone-rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range have been recognized in various stratigraphic positions in the LaHood Formation .of other areas (Coppinger> W., 1979, oral and written commun.; Thorson, J., 1979, oral commun.). This suggests the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range interval reflects sedimentary processes and environmental conditions which must have existed throughout deposition of the forma­ tion rather than a brief time of carbonate deposition which . is implied by the phrase "key horizon". Molar tooth refers to structures which resemble the molar teeth, of elephants. These structures are discontin­ uous both laterally and vertically and have been interpreted as primary sedimentary structures, inorganic diagenetic structures, and soft sediment deformation structures in cryptalgal laminites. The term has been misapplied since Bauerman (1885) first used it to describe structures identical to those in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range limestone-rich interval (Trunk, J., 1977, unpub. data). These structures in the limestone-rich interval are most reasonably interpreted as soft sediment deformation struc­ tures in cryptalgal laminites as proposed by. Trunk and Smith (1979). fStratigraphy of the LaHood Formation Tlhe LaHood Formation fines both upsection and from south to north. The southernmost exposures of the forma­ tion grade northward from conglomeratic units into inter- bedded shale and sandstone. The fining upsection may be depositional; however, it is possible that coarse deposits• at the top of the formation were eroded or faulted out. Lower portions of the formation crop out in Jeffer­ son Canyon and near LaHood Park (Fig. I). The conglom­ erate in the 1400 m thick Jefferson Canyon section appears to be chaotic, but distinct zones of crudely imbricated and aligned pebbles and cobbles, some fine-grained inter­ beds, and a channel occur. Contacts may be abrupt or grada- tional between beds containing amphibolite, marble, gneiss, \ _ and schist boulders and pebbly arkose and shaly beds. On the east side of Route 10, approximately I km. north of the Jefferson Canyon section and Ik km. south of LaHood Park, nearly vertical beds of bouldery and pebbly arkose crop out. This section contains the upper, part of the lower LaHood Formation and is faulted against pre-Belt crystalline rocks (McMannis7\1963). Here, the LaHood For­ mation contains more silty and shaly interbeds than the 12 13 Jefferson Canyon section and resembles some of the Horse­ shoe Hills sections which contain similarly interbedded lithologies. Farther to the northwest of LaHood Park, 2.5 km north of the intersection between Route 10 and Route 218, graded arkose of the upper LaHood Formation is rhythmically inter­ bedded with shale. Most basal contacts are undulatbry, but no sole marks occur on the well-exposed bedding surfaces of the pebbly arkose. The LaHood Formation here resembles rhythmically, interbedded arkose and shale in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range. In Corbly Canyon, in the Bridger Range, the lower LaHood Formation is faulted against pre-Belt crystalline rocks and contains 2500 m of pebbly, graded arkose beds. Few fine-grained or conglomeratic units are associated with this part of the section,, but according to McMannis (1963, p. 415), "...northeastward and upward in this section grains becomes less coarse but sporadic boulders and blocks , occur within 2,000' of the top...some siltite and fine­ grained arkose are interbedded in the upper 1,000'.". Fine-grained' intervals of the formation interfinger with the arkose and arkosic conglomerate in both the upper and lower LaHood Formation. An interval of fine-grained 14 LaHood rocks between St. Paul Gulch and the Boulder River grades to the northwest and southeast into lower LaHood rocks but may also grade into Greyson Shale to the north (Fig. 3). A section near St. Paul Gulch lies above this interval and contains a 100 m thick limestone-rich inter­ val (Coppinger, W ., 1979, oral and written commun.). The St. Paul Gulch section and the limestone-rich interval .in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range interfinger with coarse LaHood rocks to the south and Newland Limestone to the north. The interval in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range occurs in the upper LaHood Formation and the interval in the St. Paul Gulch section occurs in the upper-lower LaHood Formation but both are correlated with the Newland Limestone. Alexander (1955) correlated all LaHood rocks in the Whitehall area with Greyson Shale (Fig. 3), but Coppinger (W., 1979, oral commun.) stated that in this area the LaHood Formation intertongues with the Chamberlain Shale and Greyson Shale and the carbonates lie in the cor­ rect stratigraphic position to be correlated with the New- Iand Limestone. Coarse upper LaHood rocks probably interfinger with the limestone-rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills and Felix Canyon, although at the scale of McMannis' cross 15 section, the interval appears to be a time "horizon" (Fig. 3). The limestone-rich interval in both areas over- lies and underlies relatively coarse upper LaHood rocks (McMannis, 1963; Boyce, 1975) and sections measured up to the Cambrian Flathead Formation by the author suggest this as well (Appendices I and K). The upper 400 m of the Felix Canyon section and the upper 300 m of Horseshoe Hills section I contain mostly graded arkose beds, no limestone beds, and few fine-grained interbeds. Stratigraphy of the Limestone-Rich Interval of. the LaHood Formation General: Verrall (1955) and McMannis (1963) recog­ nized a limestone-rich interval in the Horseshoe Hills, and McMannis (1963) recognized the same interval in the Bridget Range. This limestone-rich interval is a 400 m thick lithostratigraphic unit characterized by two types i of depositional sequences : arkose sequences, and limestone-bearing sequences (Figs. 4a and b). Although McMannis (1963, p. 417) referred to this interval Depositional sequence in the limestone-rich LaHood interval refers to a group of beds 10-30 m thick which reflects similar depositional conditions. Several rock types may be associated with a group and may be common to both types of sequences; however, the stratigraphic rela­ tionships and proportions of rock types differ between the two types of sequences. 16 FIGURE 4a. Arkose depositions! sequence (channel deposits). Note thick, amalgamated arkose beds. FIGURE 4b. Limestone-bearing depositions! sequence (interchannel deposits). Rhythmically interbedded siltstone, shale, limestone, and arkose. FIGURE 4c. Graded bedding and siltstone, limestone, and shale clasts in arkose bed. Note scour at base of bed. FIGURE 4d. Horizontal laminae. Truncated, base cut-out sequence(?) in arkose bed. 17 informally as both the "'molar tooth' and algal zone" and "key horizon", the phrase "limestone-rich interval" describes this interval more precisely. "Limestone-rich interval" refers to an enrichment in limestone relative to other portions of the formation and implies interbedded lithologies. The two types of depositional sequences alternate four times within 200 m of Section and can be correlated across most of the study area (Fig. 5). The arkose depositional sequence contains mostly massive and graded arkose beds and the limestone-bearing depositional sequence contains interbedded limestone, shale, siltstone, and arkose (Fig. 6). Similar repetitions of the sequences are found in Horse­ shoe Hills section I (Fig. 5) and the Felix Canyon section; however, these could not be correlated with the more closely spaced Horseshoe Hills sections shown in Figure 5. Stratigraphic relationships between the uncorrelated sections can only be guessed. The Felix Canyon section con­ tains a limestone-rich interval similar and probably equiva­ lent to the Horseshoe Hills interval (McMannis, 1963; Boyce, 1975), but stratigraphic positions of depositional sequences in that interval cannot be determined from the available data. The sequences in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger 18 FIGURE 5. Location and correla­ tion of appended Horseshoe Hills measured sections, limestone- rich interval of the LaHood Formation. R 3 E 19 50 m intorbedded nvptiirian con­ cretion::, SiIintone, shale, and arkone. Ofen-CNist (?) Intrufom a t ional slump structures containing molar tooth structures; deformed concretions; soft-sediment bou- dina^e; urkose lenses, tongues, wedges, blocks; truncated deco-1 IemenL folds; re-folded folds; imbricate* thrusts. HhythmIc and random Inter- beddinj; of 11 mi-stone, ni I L- stone, shale , emit arkoae; e-ryptalgal lainlnitea; water- escape structures. Amalgamnteil -irkime beds; lubhly •/.uni-::; Inverse and normal ''railed bi-ddiin.; cross bedding; r I !'-Hf and final ini', r lasts of limestone, si H stone, and shale; water escape structures; clastic dikes; basal pebble and cobble conglomerates; channel cut- and-fill. Om FIGURE 6. Generalized stratigraphic sections of depositional sequences in the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation. 20 Range reflect the same mechanisms of transport and deposi­ tion even though the thicknesses of the depositional sequences vary greatly between uncorrelated and correlated sections. The thickness changes may reflect a change in the rate or site of deposition. Most contacts between the two types of depositional sequences are tabular and abrupt; however, an undeformed arkose sequence may drape over and fill in topography formed by a slump in a limestone-bearing depositional sequence. The amount of draping varies with the intensity of slump deformation in the limestone-bearing depositional sequence. Some slumps involve 20 m of section and extend laterally 60 m or more (one of these slumps may be seen just west of section I). According to Helwig (1970), a slump struc­ ture in which beds are relatively undeformed may represent only a small volume of the total slump and may be a large allocthonous block. Arkose Depositional Sequences: Most arkose deposi­ tional sequences contain 10 m to 25 m of thick arkose beds and may be correlated across the study area (Fig 5). Corti- relations were made in the Horseshoe. Hills sections by walk­ ing along beds, and using lithologic features and strati­ graphic positions. Most tabular arkose beds are continuous \ 21 FIGURE 7a. Conglomerate bed contains poorly sorted and inversely graded cross beds and grades upsection into massive arkose bed. FIGURE Tb. Cross bedding with stoss side preservation and tangential foreset laminae. FIGURE Tc. Dish-like structures near the upper portion of an arkose bed which grades into shale. FIGURE Td. Arkose pillar structure penetrates shale beds. 22 over 30 m or 40 m, but some may extend laterally 3 0 0 m or more. Channel deposits pinch out within 50 m. Most beds in the arkose depositional sequences contain normal grading, rip-up and floating (matrix supported) clasts, and pebbly ' zones, and some beds contain basal conglomerates and a few . sedimentary structures (Figs. 4c and d, and 7). Individual beds in arkose depositional sequences may be traced laterally or correlated between sections as parts of sedimentation units. A sedimentation unit consists of a massive or graded arkose bed and some fine-grained inter­ beds and may be correlated in spite of thickness changes - between sections. For example, laminated siItstone and shale separate pebbly arkose beds in sections A, B, C, b> E 7 and E 1 and contacts are erosional or contain injection, structures (Appendices A, B, C, D , E , E'). Basal pebbly zones, which are similar to zones scattered throughout the beds, are found in the arkose beds in the first two sedimen­ tation units. In section C , a bed which contains large- scale planar cross stratification is also associated with swirled bedding and correlated with a zone containing clasts and pebbles in sections A, B , D , E , and E '. The arkose bed in the fourth sedimentation unit contains a basal Iconglomerate with rip-up and floating clasts of lime­ stone, siltstone, and shale. Limestone-Bearing Depositional Sequences: . Most limestone-bearing depositional sequences of the LaHood limestone-rich interval range between 10 m and 30 m thick. The depositional sequences may be correlated across most of the Horseshoe Hills although many beds within these sequences pinch out or cannot be traced in deformed sec­ tions. Most sequences contain: stromatolites (associated with cryptalgal laminites); concretions; large- and small- scale deformation structures; and both randomly and rhyth­ mically interbedded limestone, siltstone, shale, and minor arkose (Fig. 8). Large- and small-scale deformation structures in limestone-bearing depositional sequences display lateral components of movement, but orientations of the structures are very inconsistent between measured sections and some­ times within a section. Slump structures contain small- scale deformation structures, plastically deformed con­ cretions, and soft sediment micrite boudins. Deformation in the micrite beds and concretions increases with the intensity of deformation in the slump structures; deforma­ tion decreases toward the bases of some depositional 23 24 FIGURE 8a. Stromatolites and horizontally interbedded calcite and dolomite. FIGURE 8b. Plastically deformed septarian concretions (scale: h feet). FIGURE 8c. Molar tooth structures (deformed cryptalgal laminites?). Note interbedded arkose tongues. FIGURE 8d. Truncated decollement folds. Undeformed arkose beds over- lie limestone-bearing depositional sequence. 25 sequences. Small-scale deformation structures which occur throughout a deformed sequence are: molar tooth deforma­ tion structures (Fig. 8c), contorted bedding, decollement folds (Fig. 8d), recumbent folds, imbricate thrusts (Fig. 9a), blocks and wedges (Fig. 9b), and normal faults. The small-scale deformation is discontinuous and may be truncated by undeformed beds. Undeformed beds in this type of depositional sequence are both rhythmically and randomly interbedded. Tabular micrite beds 2 cm to 5 cm thick may alternate with 20 cm to 30 cm thick beds of laminated shale and minor siltstone. Some I m thick arkose beds alternate with equally thick siltstone and shale intervals. Beds which contain concretions are more typical of the limestone in the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation than beds associated with molar tooth structures. Most dense micrite concretions are interbedded, sometimes rhythmically, with siltstone and shale in 20 m thick sec­ tions although a few concretions are isolated. Concretions range between 15 cm and I m long; however, in some expo­ sures, it is difficult to distinguish between long concre­ tions and continuous beds. Few arkose beds and no molar tooth structures are associated with concretions except iT FIGURE 9a. Imbricate thrust in plastic micrite bed. FIGURE 9b. Disaggregated deformation characterized by blocks and wedges of arkose interbedded with limestone and shale. FIGURE 9c. Surface expression of cone-in-cone structures in micrite concretion. Note radiating digitate structures. FIGURE 9d. Water escape structures(?) in dense micrite beds. 27 in section H where limestone and arkose are interbedded (Appendix H). Laminated carbonate beds are interbedded with stroma­ tolites and sandwiched between arkose beds. The carbonate ' beds which contain stromatolites may be traced almost continuously for 100 m, but molar tooth structures are very discontinuous. Many lenses of detrital grains occur within the laminae, and some lenses are interbedded. Micaceous arkose lenses between I mm and 10 cm thick intertongue with laminae in beds which contain molar tooth structures. Lithology Introduction The limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation contains arkose, limestone, siltstone, and shale. The arkose and limestone beds exhibit the most distinctive features, so lithologic description focuses on bed thick­ ness and contacts, sedimentary structures, and diagenetic features of these beds. . Description of Arkose Thickness and Contacts; The thickness of arkose beds, in arkose depositional sequences ranges between I m and 5 m, and beds in limestone-bearing depositional sequences range 28 between 0.5 m and 1.5 m thick. Discontinuous tongues, wedges, and lenses of arkose are found in limestone and shale interbeds and range between 2 mm and 30 cm thick. Basal contacts in arkose beds of both types of deposi- tional sequences are abrupt and undulatory or flat. ■ Most basal contacts between arkose and varve-like siltstone or shale contain cut-and-ifill and injection structures. Most cut-and-fill structures are found in the arkose depositional sequences. Some arkose beds display gradational upper con­ tacts with siltstone and fine sandstone, but many upper contacts are abrupt and flat. Contacts between dis­ continuous arkose tongues, wedges,. and lenses, and lime­ stone, siltstone, or shale beds are irregular and abrupt. General Sedimentary Structures and Diagenetic Features; Various sedimentary structures such as normal and inverse distribution graded bedding, pebbly zones, and clasts of siltstone, shale, and limestone characterize the arkose beds in the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation. Conglomerates, cross stratification, load structures, and water escape structures are also found in these beds. No sole marks or complete Bouma sequences were observed. Arkose beds in limestone-bearing depositional sequences are both massive and normally graded, and are distinguishable 29 from similar beds in‘the arkose depositions^ sequences in that they contain fewer clasts and pebbly zones. Bedding Features: The bases of many beds grade nor­ mally from a pebble conglomerate into a coarse- or medium­ grained sandstone (but some beds are inversely.graded) and recurrent graded bedding occurs in some of the thicker arkose beds. A few beds which contain swirled, deformed- looking patterns can be traced laterally into graded bed­ ding, but otherwise these, beds contain no laminae, traction structures, or clasts. The arkose bed in sedimentation unit 3 of section A contains swirled patterns and is cor­ related with a thicker arkose bed which contains planar cross beds at the base (Appendix A ) . Wedge-shaped, irregular, and flat pebbly zones are distributed throughout the beds and contain 35 per cent quartz, 30 per cent plagioclase, 10 per cent microcline, and minor biotite, muscovite, hornblende, and rock frag­ ments (McMannis, 1963; Boyce, 1975). Most basal pebbly zones contain rip-up clasts of siltstone, shale, and lime­ stone, but these clasts are also scattered throughout the beds. Traction Features: The arkose beds contain floating and bedded clasts up to 30 cm long which were ripped up from 30 limestone-bearing depositional sequences but do not contain arkose or comparable sized pre-Belt crystalline rock clasts. Shale and siltstone rip-up clasts range between 10 mm and 30 cm long and are both angular and slightly rounded. The long axes of the floating micrite clasts measure between I cm and 30 cm and may be randomly oriented or aligned with siltstone and shale clasts both parallel to, and at high angles to bedding contacts. A 2 m thick cobble conglomerate with large-scale cross bedding lies at the base of an arkose sequence west of section :J and overlies a deformed limestone-bearing sequence (Fig. 7a). Small limestone, siltstone, and shale clasts are imbricate and large clasts are randomly oriented in the poorly sorted cross bed's. Cobbly cross beds 30 cm thick alternate with 10 cm thick beds of imbricate rip-up clasts. A few arkose beds in arkose depositional sequences contain large- or small-scale cross bedding. Large scale cross beds lie at the bases of section D and the previously described cobble conglomerate. The cross beds in section D appear to be planar and are found at the base of an arkose depositional"sequence which thins to ,the east and west 31 (Appendix D). This suggests that the exposure is nearly perpendicular to the planar cross beds. Small-scale cross bedding with tangential foreset laminae and stoss side preservation is found near the tops of a few normally graded arkose beds (Fig. 7b). The only other small-scale cross strata found in the arkose beds are a few isolated lenticular beds. Angular feldspar and quartz pebbles form the cross beds in the lenticles. Diagenetic Features; Diagenetic features of the arkose beds include dish-like structures (Fig. 7c), pillar struc­ tures (Fig. 7d), and load and injection structures. Pil­ lar structures were observed in two arkose beds in limestone­ bearing depositional sequences. In both cases, the discor­ dant structures were less than 10 cm long and plastically deformed the shale beds. . Dish-like structures are found in fine sandstone near the tops of graded arkose beds and resemble antidune structures. The arkose beds associated with these structures grade upward into siltstone or shale beds. Load and injection structures are associated with the bases of pebbly arkose beds in contact with siltstone or fine'sandstone; however, some undulatory contacts which do not contain pebbles and are not erosion surfaces may con­ tain load structures. '5 32 Interpretation of Arkose General: The distinction between current and suspen­ sion deposition is more clear-cut than the distinction between various types of mass flows. In the limestone- rich interval of the LaHood Formation, the distribution graded bedding and matrix-supported clasts point to suspen­ sion deposition rather than waning current activity. ' The paucity of shallow water sedimentary structures such as ripple marks and cross beds, and the I m to 5 m thick : ' graded arkose beds indicate deep water sedimentation. Shal low water graded bedding rarely exceeds a few centimeters thick (Reinecke and Singh, 1975). Turbidity currents and grain flows have some features in common, but represent different amounts of water and turbulence. Kuenen and Miglioririi (1950) interpreted beds which lack traction features and are similar in thickness and lateral extent to beds in the LaHood limestone-rich, interval as high density turbidity current deposits, and Stauffer (1967) used the same criteria to recognize grain flow deposits. Rocheleau and LaJoie (1974) stated that grain flow deposits should lack traction features, but / Lowe (1976) proposed that sedimentary structures may form during late states of grain flow .movement or during Oresedimentation and pore water escape. The recognition of transitional flows (flows intermediate between grain flows and turbidity currents) by Middleton (1970) explains some features common to these two types of mass flow. The abundance and distribution of amalgamated^ arkose beds, graded and nongraded bedding, floating and bedded clasts, traction features, swirled bedding, con­ glomerates, and water escape structures point to turbidity current deposition for most of the beds and grain flow and transitional flow deposition for some, or parts of some beds. Pebbles of angular feldspar and quartzite and minor amounts of mafic minerals and micas which are found in the beds suggest there was sufficient transport to mechanically break metamorphic- rocks into their component minerals, but that there was little re-working or chemical weathering. Amalgamation: . The arkose depositional sequences are characterized by amalgamated sandstone beds which, accord­ ing to Walker (1966), are associated with channelized tur- bite deposits and form when upper divisions of Bouma i An amalgamated bed forms when two or more beds are deposited in rapid succession. The contact between the beds may be difficult to discern except when traced laterally into two or more beds with fine-grained inter­ beds. 33 34 sequences are eroded by subsequent turbidity currents. The amalgamated beds may be traced laterally in the LaHood limestone-rich interval into two or more turbidite sequences and the junctions may be recognized by load structures, grain size changes, and aligned shale and siltstone "clasts" which are in situ remnants of the upper Bouma divisions. Graded and Nongraded Bedding: Graded bedding is the single most common feature in beds of both types of deposi- tional sequences. Normally graded beds may form in both turbidity currents and transitional flows. In turbidity currents, settling from suspension forms division A beds of the Bouma sequence. In transitional flows, where the base undergoes pseudo-laminar flow and the top acts as a dilute turbidity current, resedimentation of the bottom may form a division A bed and traction features may form in the upper portion of the flow (Middleton, 1970) . Although no complete Bouma sequences were observed, both truncated sequences and truncated, base cut-out sequences are common and may reflect erosion by subsequent turbidity currents, or interruption of sedimentation by the second of two turbidity currents diving under the.tail of the first (Kuenen and Menard, 1952; Bouma, 1962). Most Bouma 35 sequences in the limestone-rich interval are truncated after the division A bed, and according to Walker (1966) and Mutti (1977), this type of truncation is typical of the proximal ends of turbidity current deposits and submarine channel deposits. The.truncated, base cut-out sequences observed contain only the lower division of parallel laminae (Fig. 4d). A few beds which contain division A grading at the base and small-scale cross bedding near the top, are mis­ sing the middle divisions of the Bouma sequence and there is no evidence of erosion or amalgamation. These beds may represent transitional flow deposits in which the base was resedimented to form a division A bed, and the top was re-worked by the dilute turbidity current portion of the . flow. Inverse graded bedding is found mostly in basal peb­ ble conglomerates associated with arkose depositional sequences. Shear stress at the base of a suspension may sort larger clasts toward the top and, according to Davies and Walker (1974), turbulence and ,dispersive pressure sup­ port the clasts. Hendry (1973) suggested inverse grading . forms by progressive liquifaction of unconsolidated sedi­ ment masses on a slope, and Walker '(1975) stated inverse to 36 normal grading in conglomerates represents deposition on steep slopes and normal grading represents deposition on more gentle slopes. Most nongraded beds with flat upper and lower contacts also lack traction features and floating clasts and occur in limestone-bearing depositional sequences. These features together reflect grain flow deposition and may represent deposition in a steep-sided basin (Stauffer, 1967). The association of nongraded arkose beds with deformed limestone-bearing depositional sequences is con­ sistent with deposition on steep slopes. Traction Features: Graded, amalgamated arkose beds in the LaHood limestone-rich interval contain traction features such as large- and small-scale.cross bedding, but no sole marks. Sole marks characterize many turbidite deposits; however, a lack of these may indicate very dilute or very rapid turbidity currents (Dzulynski and Walton, 1965). Bedding planes in the limestone-rich interval are poorly exposed and load structures may obscure sole marks. In addition, the beds lack cross bedding, contain large floating clasts, and some have features of grain flow deposits. . This evidence suggests the flows were dense 37 and therefore, the apparent lack of sole marks probably reflects rapid movement. Grain flow deposits should have fewer traction features than turbidity current deposits although traction features occur near the tops of beds in any type of mass flow. Large-scale cross bedding occurs at the bases of beds in arkose depositional sequences and small-scale cross strati­ fication is usually found at the tops of beds. A few iso­ lated lenticular beds which contain small-scale cross beds occur in the middle portions of a few beds, and one lenti-. cle occurs near the top of a bed in section G (Appendix. G) . . ' One bed near the center of a channel contains swirled bedding (characteristic of grain flow deposits and high density turbidity current deposits) and large-scale planar cross bedding. If tractioh at the base formed the cross beds, it is likely this part of the bed represents a tur- bity current deposit. The cross beds may represent a transi­ tion from the flow-regime which produces graded bedding to one in which lower parallel laminae form, and the bed which contains.them may represent a truncated, base cut-out sequence. Williams (1966) proposed that planar cross beds form in migrating braided streams during lateral accretion. 38 Processes of braided distributaries on submarine fans are similar to those of terrestrial braided streams, so it is likely the planar cross beds indicate migration of a dis­ tributary channel. According to Stauffer (1967), turbulence of high den­ sity turbidity currents may be damped by excess sand and form non-turbulent mass flows and Middleton (1970) sug­ gested grain flows may become transitional flows and turbidity currents as a mass accelerates downslope and mixes with water. It is possible that the toe of a mass flow near the center of the channel mixed with water and became turbulent enough to form the cross beds. The bed grades laterally into a Bouma division A bed which would be consistent with this interpretation. In addition, if a turbidity current were damped by excess sand, one would, expect the formation of a Bouma division A bed, not large- scale cross beds, when the mass resedimented. .The cobble conglomerate differs from descriptions of resedimented conglomerates (Hendry, 1973; Davies and Walker, 1974; Rocheleau and LaJoie, 1974; Walker, 1975; Walker, 1977; Cossey and Ehrlich, 1979) due to the presence of large-scale, high-angle cross bedding. The conglomerate beds which contain small clasts and inverse grading 39 alternate with cobbly beds. Although the cross bedding indicates traction deposition, the overlying graded and nongraded arkose beds must have been deposited by a dense flow with less turbulence. It is possible a dilute tur­ bidity current became damped by excess sand or a change in slope and caused the large clasts to drop out rapidly. The lack of traction feature's in the upper part of the bed may indicate that the flow became quite dense or rapid. Small-scale cross beds with stoss side preservation and tangential foreset laminae are found in fine sand­ stone which grades upward into siltstone and shale (Fig. 7b). Stoss preservation occurs when sedimentation rates exceed erosion rates, and tangential foreset laminae reflect high current velocities (Blatt and others, 1972); both are consistent with deposition by turbidity currents and transitional flows. Other small-scale cross beds in isolated lenticular bedding contain angular feldspar and . quartz pebbles. The grain size distribution in the denti­ cles contrasts with the typical sand-mud association in lenticular bedding but also reflects alternating slack and turbulent flow. These isolated lenticular beds indicate at least some localized turbulence, if not turbulence throughout the bed, and would preclude grain flow 40 deposition. A few isolated denticles within beds suggest turbulent flow and a limited supply of pebbles during depo­ sition. According to Mutti (1977), turbidity currents which by-pass the mouths of•active channels often change from confined to unconfined flow and pass through a slope change as well. The excess sand deposited may be re-worked by the tail of the same current or subsequent currents to form lenticular bedding. Diagenetic Features: Turbidity currents, transitional flows, and grain flows move rapidly and deposit water-laden sediments. Water escape structures often form during con­ solidation of these rapidly deposited "quick" sediments (Lowe and LoPiccalo, 1974). In the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation, water escape structures include . pillar and probably dish structures, and clastic dikes. The liquifaction and fluidization of sediment masses which produce these structures may be generated by gas pressure, hydrostatic pressure, and most frequently, by earthquakes (Reihecke and Singh, 1975). Dish-like structures, which resemble antidune, struc­ tures or disrupted climbing ripples, occur at the tops of graded arkose beds'. These structures are often associ­ ated with each other in beds of turbidity current origin 41 (Rautman and Dottz 1977) and may form during late stages of grain flows or during fluidized sediment escape through or around semi-permeable laminae or sediment masses. Although Wentworth (1967) proposed a primary origin for the dish structures, most workers attribute post- depositional pore water escape to the formation of clastic dikes, and pillar and dish structures. Dish structures cannot be used to distinguish between high and low density turbidity current deposits or grain flow and turbidity current deposits but characterize rapidly deposited sedi­ ment whether they are primary sedimentary structures, water escape structures, or sedimentary structures modi­ fied by pore water escape. Load structures often form on the soles of beds when a sandy layer overlies a water-laden layer. Differential loading and density differences in rapidly deposited sedi­ ments result in penetration of the dense layer into the less dense one (Dzulynski and Walton, 1965; Reinecke and Singh, 1975). Load structures in the limestone-rich inter­ val are associated with amalgamated arkose beds and arkbse beds overlying laminated siltstone and shale beds and are consistent with rapid deposition by mass flows. 42 Description of Carbonates Thickness and Contacts: Tabular limestone beds range in thickness from I cm to 10 cm but most beds are between 2 cm and 5 cm thick. Some beds are thickened by slump deformation and imbrication^and beds which contain load casts and concretions vary in thickness from 5, cm to 30 cm. Calcite and dolomite laminae range between I mm and I cm thick in beds associated with algal stromatolites and molar tooth structures. Limestone beds.which contain stromato­ lites range between 2 cm and 10 cm thick. Contacts between tabular limestone beds and siltstone or shale beds, and a few contacts between limestone beds and underlying arkose beds are abrupt and flat except in slump structures. A small growth fault contact between a limestone bed and an overlying shale bed was found in section H (Appendix H). Contacts between beds which con­ tain concretions and siltstone and shale beds are undula- tory or wavy and some contacts between arkose beds and underlying limestone beds are erosional. 43 General Primary Sedimentary Structures and Diagenetic Features: Primary sedimentary structures of the limestone beds include: laminae formed by stromatolites, and con­ centrations of both detrital grains and "organic"^ mate­ rial. Features which are diagenetic include: open folds, small-scale deformation structures (Figs. 8c and 9a), concretions (Figs. 8b and 9c), dolomitization of laminae in molar tooth structures and cryptalgal laminites, and water escape structures (Fig. 9d). Laminae:. Most laminae in dense micrite beds are visible only in thin section and are formed by concentra­ tions of "organic" carbon which contain angular feldspar and quartz grains. Both "organic" carbon and detrital material are evenly distributed in laminated and structure­ less beds, but the largest detrital grains occur in the laminated beds. Cryptalgal laminites associated with stromatolites are identical to laminae in molar tooth deformation structures. According to Trunk (J ., 1977, unpub. data), dolomite laminae in beds associated with molar tooth structures contain two to three times more 4 Chemical analyses by Trunk (J., 1978, oral commun.) suggest the carbon is organic; however, the results of the analyses have not been verified. 44 "organic" material and six time’s more detritus than the calcite laminae. Some of the "organic" material and detri- tal grains are imbricate at high angles to the laminae and form pod-like chaotic masses. Stromatolites: Two stromatolite beds occur within laminated carbonate beds. The stromatolites are both mammillary knobs which resemble load structures and branch­ ing columnar structures (Fig. 8a). The undeformed laminae and molar tooth deformation structures associated with stromatolites contain flaky black micaceous shale and varicolored siltstone identical to the shale and silt- stone associated with molar tooth structures and some horizontally bedded shale and siltstone in other sections of the Horseshoe Hills. Soft-Sediment Deformation: Soft-sediment deformation in tabular beds includes open folds, normal faults, imbri­ cate thrusts, recumbent folds, and re-folded folds. The imbricate thrusts show some draping (Fig. 9a) and folded beds are associated with blocks and wedges of arkose, silt­ stone, and shale and overlie undeformed or relatively unde­ formed beds (Fig. 8d). Molar tooth structures and other small-scale deformation structures are randomly oriented and display configurations which appear to be related to 45 bed or laminae thickness. Thinly bedded or laminated carbonates seem to be most contorted and thicker beds are broken and" less intensively deformed. Concretions: Dense, dark gray to black micrite con­ cretions are widespread and abundant and most contain septarian structures and rims of radiaxial fibrous calcite mosaics. A few small concretions have flat tops and soles and contain iron concentrations and calcite veins. Large concretions may contain deformed laminae which can be traced laterally into the enclosing shale beds. Some soft sediment bpudins and load structures also formed in dense micrite and superficially resemble septarian concretions. "Organic" carbon stringers and detrital grains occur along laminae and are evenly distributed in the concretions. Isolated concretions display radiating digitate structures on the top surfaces and have been referred to as possible halite mushrooms (Boyce, 1975). The texture within the digitate structures resembles halite hoppers, but is the surface expression of cone-in-cone structures in finely laminated impure limestone (Fig. 9c). Apical angles in the cone-in-cone structures are less than 70 degrees. Water Escape Structures (?): The tops and bottoms of many tabular beds contain worm trail-like structures which 46 protrude from the surfaces and are both randomly oriented and aligned along preferred fracture systems (Fig. 9d). In some beds, these structures are traced to an internal silty layer along micro-faults which show reverse drag. The reverse drag may reflect fluidization and suggests the structures are sediment-filled tension cracks. Interpretation of Carbonate Beds General: The carbonate beds reflect both inorganic and organic origins. The inorganic limestone beds probably precipitated during early diagenesis' of suspension deposits and the organic carbonate beds represent calcite precipi­ tation and sediment trapping by blue-green algae followed by dolomitization of organic-rich layers. Both inorganic and organic carbonate beds were plastically deformed and may have been resedimented. Much of the carbonate is recrystallized; however, one would expect to find oolites, pisolites, or primary struc­ tures in some of the beds or thin sections if the car- ■ bonates are shallow water deposits. Cathode luminesence treatment revealed no relict textures indicative of shallow water deposition (Eby, D., 1978, oral commun.). Although the carbonate beds contain detrital grains, they reflect 47 relatively low energy conditions during deposition. The horizontally interbedded shale, rhythmic alternation of shale and siltstone with limestone, and the association with deep water sandstone deposits is consistent with low energy deposition in deep water. Stromatolites, molar tooth structures, and relatively undeformed cryptalgal laminites reflect biologic origins modified by diagenetic processes. The. molar tooth struc­ tures have been interpreted as deformed cryptalgal laminites (Trunk and Smith, 1979) and occur in discontinuous blocks and sheets associated with slump structures. This suggests the beds which contain molar tooth structures were trans­ ported to the depositional site. Randomly and rhythmically interbedded shale and silt- stone are consistent with suspension deposition which sug­ gests that the interbedded, deformed, and load-cast micrite also is a product of suspension deposition. Most of the concretions are early diagenetic calcite precipitates prob­ ably related to concentrations of "organic" matter which settled from suspensions of. pelagic sediments and the tails of turbidity currents. It is also possible that periodic, in situ calcite precipitation occurred. 48 Laminae; Laminae in dense micrite beds and concre­ tions and cryptalgal laminites are formed by concentrations of detrital grains and "organic" matter. The laminae, in inorganic limestone beds formed during settling of suspen­ sions. The laminae in molar tooth structures and unde­ formed cryptalgal laminites are related to algal mat accre­ tion. In deep water, algal mats accrete mostly by direct precipitation of calcite by blue-green algae (Hoffman, 1976) The absence of oolites in the limestone-rich interval, the association of algal laminites with deep water turbidite deposits, and the fact that skeletal calcite was lacking during the Precambrian also suggest that algal mat accre­ tion in the LaHood Formation was by direct precipitation by algae. Dolomite laminae in cryptalgal laminites represents early diagenetic replacement of calcite by dolomite. The relationship between dolomitization and organic matter is not firmly established; however, Gebelein and Hoffman (1973) stated that the decomposition of organic matter frees mag­ nesium ions which replace calcium ions in calcite and form dolomite in the relict algal mat layers. 49 In the LaHood Formation concretions, most laminae are visible in thin section although laminae in a few concre­ tions may be traced in outcrop as well. Either parallel or deformed laminae occur in concretions of the limestone- rich interval. According to Raiswell (1971), the presence of parallel laminae reflects concretion development during, late diagenesis in sediment with less than 40 per cent porosity, whereas the presence of deformed laminae indi­ cates early diagenetic concretion development in sediment with approximately 70 per cent porosity. Stromatolites: Stromatolites are intimately associ­ ated with cryptalgal laminites and are known to exist in abundance at depths as great as 1000 m (Monty, 1977). In deep water where particulate sediment is terrigenous, stro­ matolites accrete by direct precipitation rather than sedi­ ment trapping (Hoffman, 1976). The stromatolites and cryptalgal laminites are interbedded with clastic sediment in the LaHood Formation which suggests accretion must have been by direct precipitation of calcite. The presence of clastic grains within laminae does indicate some entrap­ ment of particulate material; however, the calcite and dolo­ mite could not have derived from skeletal carbonates. 50 The stromatolites are associated with laminated carbo­ nate beds (some of which are deformed) and are'interbedded with arkose beds typical of deep water turbidite, transi­ tional, and grain flows. The morphology of the stromato­ lites and association with cryptalgal laminites is typical of low energy environments (Peryt and Piatkowski, 1977) and consistent with relatively deep water deposition. However, some workers associate the same morphologies with protected intertidal and supratidal environments (Donaldson, 1976; Horodyski, 1976). Monty (1977) stated that the use of overlying and underlying deposits to infer growth condi­ tions of stromatolites is hazardous. The stromatolites and cryptalgal laminites in the LaHood Formation are overlain and underlain by arkose beds which indicates either there were episodes of clastic influx, or the arkose beds and the carbonate beds did not form in the same environment. The fact that deformed, discontinuous beds of molar tooth ' structures are found in sequences which contain turbidite deposits and slump structures suggests that some algal . beds were transported. The partially coherent and dissagre- gated deformation structures which contain cryptalgal lami­ nites are typical of open-cast slump structures on sub­ marine slopes (Corbett, 1973). The fact that algal beds 51 are not associated with any shallow water sedimentary struc tures is also consistent with this interpretation. Concretions: Septarian concretions are widespread and abundant and represent early diagenetic or syngenetic cal- cite precipitation in pore space (Weeks, 1953) and reflect the original amount of pore space (Hudson, 1978) . The concretions are siliceous, but are composed primarily of micrite with rims of radiaxial fibrous calcite mosaics. The radiaxial fibrous calcite mosaics found in both tabu­ lar micrite beds and concretions probably represent 'replacement of acicular calcite cement (Kendall and Tucker, 1973). The replacement of acicular calcite cement occurs in deep and shallow water and may be related to concen­ trations of organic matter (Kendall, 1977). Laminae in beds overlying and underlying a few con­ cretions seem to flow around the concretion and indicate early diagenetic development of the concretions (Raiswell, 1971). The shape of concretions is related to the permea­ bility of the host sediment. Most concretions in the limestone-rich interval are ellipsoidal although a few are spheroidal or flat. The ellipsoidal concretions reflect increased permeability along bedding planes and the great­ est diameters represent "horizons" where the concretions 52 initially formed (Henningsmoen7 1974). These "horizons" are fossiliferous in Phanerozoic rocks, but are probably related to organic-rich layers in Proterozoic rocks. Bits of "organic" material may have settled with pelagic sedi­ ments or at the tails of turbidity currents after being ripped-up from areas of accretion. The rhythmic inter­ bedding of concretions with shale and siltstone is con­ sistent with the turbidite interpretation. . Early diagenetic concretions form within the upper 10 m of sediment (Bjpfrlykke7 1974) . The early diagenetic concretions in the LaHood Formation were plastically deformed which indicates that deformation was early dia­ genetic also, and supports the concept of open-cast slump­ ing. Beds described by Henningsmoen (1974, p. 410) are similar to some in the.limestone-rich interval. There are various transitions, both from horizon to horizon as well as within one horizon from isolated, roundish nod­ ules to continuous, knobby limestone layers and from flat-topped and flat-soled nodules to continuous plane-parallel limestone layer s... in small exposures it may be hard to determine whether part of a large nodule or a continuous layer is present. Henningsmoen (1974) proposed dissolution of once-cpntinuous 'beds as an origin for these nodular beds and Bjjtfrlykke 53 (1973) proposed the same mechanism for some concretions he studied. Although most concretions in the LaHood Formation are septarian, it is possible that beds which lack septarian structures and other attributes of early diagenetic concretion development represent early dissolu­ tion of limestone beds. Isolated concretions which contain cone-in-cone structures are believed to be diagenetic and form during compaction of calcareous shales following recyrstalIiza- tion of calcite (Raiswell, 1971). The compaction of water­ laden sediments is consistent with beds which contain evi^ dence of deposition while "quick", such as water escape structures and septarian concretions; however, there is evidence that these structures may be typical of partially compacted sediments as well. Apical angles in cone-in-cone structures are a function of the degree of sediment hydro­ plasticity (Franks, 1969). In.this interval of the forma­ tion, apical angles measure less than 70 degrees which is typical of partially.compacted shales. Soft-sediment deformation; The open folds, normal . faults, and imbricate thrusts are associated with rela^ tively undeformed limestone-bearing depositional sequences as well a,s intensively deformed ones. The recumbent folds 54 and re-folded folds are associated with blocks and wedges of arkose, siltstone, and shale in more intensively deformed sections. Discontinuous beds which contain molar tooth structures occur in large-scale slump structures. The molar tooth deformation structures represent gravity and shear deforma­ tion of cryptalgal laminites (Trunk and Smith, 1979). The density differences between dolomite and calcite laminae resulted in primarily vertical deformation, and shearing caused lateral displacement of the deformed laminae. It is likely algae precipitated calcite, so the density dif­ ferences attributed to initiating deformation may be due to replacement of calcite with dolomite during organic matter decomposition. It is also possible that the defor­ mation occurred prior to dolomitization and was related to density differences between detrital-rich and detrital- poor layers. Evidence for open-cast slumping in the LaHood Forma­ tion is based on the work of Kelling and Williams (1966), and Corbett (1973) and includes: truncated deformation structures which show lateral components of movement, plastically deformed septarian concretions, imbrication, of plastic beds, and highly disturbed, interbedded arkose, 55 siltstone, and shale. Much of the small-scale deformation is associated with decollement surfaces which also supports the concept of open-cast slumping. Corbett (1973) identi­ fied beds of turbidity current origin (which are similar to beds in the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood For­ mation) as parts of semi-coherent, partially disaggregated, and incoherent slump structures. The orientation of the deformation is rarely consis­ tent and suggests that local slopes and tectonic instabil­ ity controlled deformation. The incorporation of blocks of cryptalgal laminites indicates some regional slumping as well. Although most deformation is plastic, the imbrica­ tion and faulting indicate some brittle deformation and tensional stress. The tensional stress may have been related to a pull-apart zone although other tensional fea­ tures are absent. The association of relatively undeformed beds with . coherent slump structures implies gentle regional tilting rather than slumping from a channel wall (Corbett, 1973). Although the orientation of small-scale deformation is inconsistent with larger-scale deformation structures, the large-scale structures within a section are usually consistent with each other which points to regional 56 tectonic or topographic controls on deformation„ The apparent direction of movement varies from section to section. The fact that molar tooth structures are not interbedded with concretions■may indicate that beds.which contain those structures are transported. The deforma­ tion of septarian concretions indicates post-yearly dia- genetic deformation and suggests the concretions were resedimented within semi-coherent slump sheets. When molar tooth structures and concretions are correlated laterally in deformed sections, the deformation may reflect different episodes from different sources, or may repre­ sent one episode of deformation for the concretions, and two episodes for the molar tooth structures. Water Escape Structures: The worm trail-like struc­ tures represent pore water escape in water-laden micrite beds. Many beds which contain these structures have an interbedded siltstone layer. Micro-faults which originate in the silty layer show "reverse drag"; this may reflect escape by fluidized sediment rather than shearing and would be consistent with water escape structures. Some of the bedding surface patterns follow a preferred fracture system which may indicate these structures represent tension cracks. Similar structures have been described by 57 Dzulynski and Walton (1965) and may form when liquified sandstone layers expand and increase in lateral extent, but adjacent shale beds do not increase in lateral extent. The effect is a relative decrease in the extent of the shale layers which results in the formation of tension cracks into which sediment may be forced. Description of Siltstone and Shale Thickness, Lateral Extent,_and Contacts: Shale beds range between 5 cm and 50 cm thick and contain flaky, micaceous laminae approximately I mm thick. Some beds are poorly indurated and associated with "organic" matter. Most siltstone beds contain pastel laminae and range between 10 cm and 30 cm thick. Some shale and siltstone beds are continuous for 50 m and others are discontinuous, particularly those associated with deformation structures. The most discontinuous beds are remnants found in amalga­ mated sandstone beds. Contacts between shale beds and limestone and silt­ stone beds are flat or undulatory except when beds are intensively deformed. Both shale and siltstone beds may be cut by overlying arkose beds.. 58 Primary Sedimentary Structures: Small-scale cross stratification occurs in siltstone beds, especially those which underlie graded arkose beds. In section E', cross bedded siltstone is interbedded with shale and cut by arkose clastic dikes. Both siltstone and shale beds are finely laminated and may rhythmically alternate with arkose or limestone beds. Interpretation of Siltstone and Shale The rhythmically and randomly interbedded siltstone, shale, and limestone beds in limestone-bearing deposi- tional sequences are similar to thinly bedded turbidite deposits described by Mutti (1977) and represent either, deposits at the tails of turbidity currents, or pelagic suspensions. Rhythmically interbedded deposits are more consistent with periodic influx typical of turbidity cur­ rents. (Keith and Friedman, 1977). Siltstone and shale beds associated with amalgamated sandstone beds in arkose depositional sequences probably represent suspension deposits of turbidity currents also. 59 SEDIMENTARY-TECTONIC ENVIRONMENT OF DEPOSITION Introduction Previous Interpretations Most workers agree that the LaHood Formation is a clastic wedge deposit which was derived from pre-Belt crystalline rocks along the southern margin of the Belt embayment, but have variously interpreted the formation as the littoral equivalent of other Belt rocks (Peale, 1893; Walcott, 1899), a wedge arkose deposit (Alexander, 1955) ; a moderately deep water debris flow, turbidite, and grain flow deposit (McMannis, 1963; Hawley, 1973) , and as an alluvial fan or fan-delta deposit (Boyce, 1975). Boyce (1975) interpreted the limestone-rich interval of the Horseshoe Hills as a braided stream,tidal flat, and lacustrine complex. In contrast to the littoral interpretation (Peale, 1893; Walcott, 1899) ,. Alexander (1955) described the LaHood Formation as a "wedge arkose" which was deposited in an 5 "intracratonic basin" and stated that the depositional 5Alexander (1955) used the terms "wedge arkose" and "intracratonic basin" in the sense of. Dapples and others (1948) to describe a linear clastic wedge which develops when a positive area adjacent to a basin undergoes strong uplift through normal faulting. Once sediment is trapped in the basin, little re-working or transport can occur. 60 area must have been subsiding rapidly adjacent to the nor­ mal fault margin. The fact that little re-working occurred led Alexander (1955) to conclude that deposition was below wave base. The coarseness, thickness, and mineralogical and textural immaturity of the deposit, in addition to the presence of disseminated iron sulfide, and the "almost complete absence" of shallow water features such as ripple marks, cross beds, salt casts, raindrop imprints, and mud cracks led McMarinis (1963, p. 433) to believe that tor­ rential streams deposited sediment into a differentially subsiding basin adjacent to an east-west trending fault zone. He proposed that turbidity currents and slumps re-distributed material to stable bottom areas in moder­ ately deep water. Hawley (1973; D., 1977, oral commun.) concurred with McMannis' interpretation and also proposed that some beds in the LaHood Formation were deposited by grain flows. According to Boyce (1975), the formation represents fault-controlled deposition along the southern margin of the Belt embayment related to initial stages of continental rifting at a triple junction; the embayment formed in the failed arm of the triple junction. Boyce (1975, p. 167) 61 also proposed that the LaHood Formation represents an alluvial fan or possibly a fan-delta system and stated. Earlier workers have been impressed by graded bedding in the LaHood Formation and have missed other important sedimentary struc­ tures . Some areas of the LaHood Formation outcrop are possibly related to marine sedi­ mentation in moderate depths of water...the base of the St. Paul Gulch section and 1-90 section are characterized by graded bedding, intraformational slump and soft sediment defor­ mation. In these cases, the process of emplace­ ment was turbidity current or fluidized flow in a mud-rich environment. Boyce (1975, p. 190) acknowledged that the "down deposi- tional dip" occurrence of "thick mud rock sequences and deltaic-like sequences", soft sediment deformation and slump structures associated with dish structures, graded beds, and algal stromatolites are inconsistent with the alluvial fan and fan-delta hypotheses and suggested that the alluvial fan or fan-delta deposits represented by the LaHood Formation interfinger with other depositional sys­ tems. In Boyce's model, the arkose beds represent braided stream deposits, the siltstone and shale beds represent levee and overbank deposits, and the limestone beds may be interpreted as lacustrine deposits. 62 Author 1s Interpretation Detailed study by the author shows that the limestone- rich interval of the LaHood Formation reflects deep water slump, suspension, and mass flow processes typical of sub­ marine fans. Boyce (1975) attributed these processes to depositional systems other than alluvial fan and fan-delta systems and Coppinger (W., 1979, oral and written commun.) believed the St. Paul Gulch section (which Boyce suggested may contain turbidite and grain flow deposits) is similar to the Horseshoe Hills limestone-rich interval. Thus, the LaHood Formation represents two depositional systems if the alluvial fan and fan-delta deposits are interpreted correctly. Dickenson (W., 1979, oral commun.) visited several sections in the Whitehall area and Horseshoe Hills which Boyce (1975) interpreted as alluvial fan deposits and believed these sections are more reasonably interpreted as feeder channels, upper fan, and middle fan deposits of a submarine fan system. This suggests the alluvial deposits have not been preserved. Many submarine fans are higher in clay content than the LaHood Formation (Boyce, 1975); however, the texture of submarine fans is dependent upon the material supplied as it by-passes the shelf. Deposits may display little 63 evidence of re-working and be quite coarse if the material supplied to the fan is coarse and rapidly burled. The fresh feldspars in the LaHood Formation attest to little re-working or weathering which could produce clay min­ erals. The possibility that sediment storage on land was significantly lower during the Precambrian (Schumm, 1968) and sedimentation rates were probably rapid enough to bury sediment before much weathering or re-working could occur together may.account for unusually coarse fan deposits in the LaHood Formation. The features such as cross bedding, ripple marks, stromatolites, possible halite mushrooms, and mud cracks which Boyce (1975) believed to reflect shallow Water deposi tion are uncommon in the formation and are associated with graded, amalgamated arkose beds, and rhythmically and randomly interbedded siltstone, shale, and limestone. It seems more likely that the cross beds and ripple marks reflect traction deposition and the halite mushrooms and . mud cracks are more reasonably interpreted as cone-in-cone structures and water escape structures or sediment-filled tension cracks as discussed in the lithology section. The usefulness of stromatolites to infer water depth is ques­ tionable and is also discussed in the lithology section. 64 The stratigraphic relationships and relative abundance of these features indicate the beds were deposited in rela- -tively deep water. The alternating depositional sequences in the limestone-rich LaHood interval represent proximal turbi- diate and grain flow deposits characteristic of channels, channel mouths, and interchannel areas of the lower-upper fan and middle fan of a submarine fan system similar to. deposits described by Nelson and Nilsen (1974), Normark (1978), and Walker (1978). Periodic slumping was probably related to local and regional faulting in addition to bank erosion of submarine channels. Some large-scale slumps on the slope may have transported cryptalgal laminite beds to the submarine fan environment (Fig. 10). Submarine fans are associated with active tectonic environments such as that proposed for the LaHqod Forma­ tion by Alexander (1955) and Boyce (1975). The evidence for faulting during Belt time, fault-controlled deposition for the formation as a whole, and the presence of intra- formational slump structures in the limestone-rich inter­ val indicate that deposition of the limestone-rich inter­ val was also fault-controlled. East-west transform move­ ment related to initial stages of continental rifting may 65 FEEDER CHANNEL SLOPE INTO BASIN UPPER FAN M ID-FAN (nt' ,', J1 DEBRIS FLOWS VKHBLY SANDSTONESDISORGANIZED BED CONGLOMERATES MASSIVE SANDSTONESCONGLOMERATES INVERSE-NORMAL GRADED BEDDING THIN BEDDED TURBIDITE THIN BEDDED TURUIDITEGRADED-STRATIFIED TNTERCHANNEL CHANNEL. FIGURE 10. Submarine fan model. Cross section X-X1 shows the relation­ ship between channel deposits (arkose depositional sequences) and inter­ channel deposits (limestone-bearing depositional sequences) of the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation. Greatly modified from Mutti (1977) and Walker (1978). 66 have produced secondary shear faults south of the east-west fault zone. Terrestrial streams which supplied clastic material may have been associated with the northwest- southeast trending shear (?) faults. Both the supply and distribution of sediment would have been influenced by the intensity and frequency of faulting. Additional work is necessary in order to recognize facies changes which might indicate the relationship between sedimentary and tectonic processes.. The relationships between submarine fan deposits of the LaHood Formation and finer Belt rocks which lie to the north are not clear. It is likely some of these are lower-middle fan and lower fan deposits (Fig. 10). The depositional environment of the Newland Limestone may have been similar to that of the LaHood limestones but the deposits may not intertongue. If the northern margin of ■ the Belt embayment was a gentle warp (Harrison and others, 1974; McMannis, 1965), it is possible the Newland Lime­ stone accumulated contemporaneously with the. LaHood Forma­ tion but the site of deposition did not receive the same amount or intensity of clastic influx or tectonism as the southern margin of.the Belt embayment. 67 Sedimentary Environment of Deposition The thick sequences of arkose which contain con­ glomerates, graded, "clast-bearing beds, and evidence of grain flow may represent deposits at the distal ends of feeder channels on the lower-upper portion of a submarine fan (Fig. 10) . The alternation of depositional sequences may be explained in terms of migration of a distributary chan­ nel so that the channel deposits appear to be super­ imposed on the interchannel sequences rather than later­ ally gradational with them (Fig. 5). The graded arkose beds which contain pebbly zones and rip-up and floating clasts probably represent deposition in distributary chan­ nels on a lobe of the middle fan. The significant thicken­ ing and thinning of channel sequences in the Horseshoe Hills sections is probably due to longitudinal outcrop views of sinuous distributary channels. Measured sections which could not be correlated probably represent deposits of other lobes or distributary systems of the middle fan. The limestone-bearing depositional sequences are inter­ preted as thinly bedded turbidite and pelagic suspension deposits in interchannel areas (Fig. 10). The interchannel 68 deposits contain slump structures which reflect local and regional topographic and tectonic controls on slumping. Channel Deposits The channel deposits are represented by arkose deposi- tional sequences. The abrupt lateral thickness changes, amalgamation, and sedimentary features of beds in these sequences of the LaHood Formation are characteristic of mid­ f a n proximal^ turbidite and transitional flow deposits described by Walker (1966) and Mutti (1977). Few conglom­ eratic units, usually associated with upper fan channel deposits, are found in the limestone-rich interval which suggests most of the channels occupied the middle fan,. The cobble conglomerate at the base of an arkose depositional sequence near section H is not typical of resedimented conglomerates, but may represent a braided distributary channel .deposit of the■lower-upper fan or the upper-middle . fan (Fig. 10). The presence of grain flow and turbidity current features in a single bed is consistent with channels in the ^Proximal turbidite deposits do not necessarily represent flows on upper (proximal) portions of sub­ marine fans but they exhibit many features of upper fan deposits such as amalgamated sandstone beds, a lack of sole marks, incomplete Bouma sequences, and a relatively high sand:shale ratio. 69 mid-fan region. According to Keith and Friedman ' (1977), distributary channels are deepest near their center so it is possible for the central portions of flows to accelerate more rapidly than the edges. Since liquifac- tion and fluid movement are dependent upon thickness, acceleration, water content, and turbulence of a mass flow under gravity, it is likely single flows in the chan­ nels acted as both grain flows and turbidity currents. Upper and middle fan channels confine rapid succes­ sions of mass flows. The consecutive mass flows form amalgamated sandstone beds which contain incomplete Bouma sequences and characterize these portions of submarine fans (Fig. 10). Channel deposits are confined and, therefore are not as susceptible to slumping as interchannel deposits. Chan nel migration in the braided distributaries causes bank undercutting and may generate.slumps in interchannel deposits. Isolated lenticular bedding has been recognized in deposits similar to the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation and, according.to Mutti (1977); this type of bedding may form when turbidity currents by-pass the mouths of channels on the inner fan. The sand which is 70 dropped due to a slope change or as the turbidity current passes from confined to unconfined flow may be re-worked by the tail of the same current or subsequent currents to form lenticular bedding. Interchannel Deposits Interchannel deposits on submarine fans are charac­ terized by low sand to shale ratios and reflect suspension deposition (Fig. 10). Many interchannel deposits contain slump structures and small-scale deformation (Mutti, 1977). Arkose beds in interchannel deposits of the LaHood Forma­ tion do not differ greatly from channel arkose deposits. The interchannel deposits of the limestone-rich interval are thinner, contain fewer clasts than the channel arkose beds, and are mostly nongraded which indicates deposition from suspensions at the tails of turbidity currents and . transitional flows which spilled over channels, or grain flows formed, by damped turbidity currents. The inter- bedded siltstone and shale in the limestone-bearing deppsi- tional' sequences represent both pelagic and turbidity cur­ rent suspensions and the cross-bedded siltstone beds probably represent re-working by bottom currents or the tails of turbidity currents. "Organic" matter in shale and inorganic limestone beds was probably transported from 71 algal limestone beds on the shelf edge and slope by slump­ ing and turbidity current flows. Some sections of the limestone-rich interval contain relatively undeformed beds and may be portions of large allocthonous sheets; however, additional work is neces­ sary in order to determine the mechanisms and nature of deformation. Much deformation in submarine slump struc­ tures is inconsistently oriented and points to local tectonic or topographic control on deformation. In the limestone-rich interval of the LaHood Formation, slump structures which fill channels and are overlain by thick channel deposits may represent bank undercutting and local faulting. ■ However, slump structures which contain blocks of cryptalgal laminites and arkose beds, and decollement folds are similar to descriptions of open-cast slumps and probably reflect regional tectonic instability. Plastic deformation of early diagenetic concretions and the decrease in deformation downsection in. some slump structures support the interpretation of open-cast slump­ ing in interchannel regions of the middle fan. The con­ cretions do not occur with molar tooth structures or other beds of probable algal origin which suggests that the "organic" particles, which probably served as nuclei 72 for the concretions, settled from pelagic suspensions or were transported by slumping and did not form in the environment of deposition. Tectonic Environment of Deposition Although the depositional sequences may be explained in terms of normal submarine channel and interchannel pro­ cesses, some features of the limestone-rich interval are best explained in terms of regional and local tectonic controls. The presence of blocks or sheets of algal lime­ stones in slump structures which do not contain concre­ tions, and the probability that slumps were open-cast together suggest that regional and local faulting control­ led slump processes and some small-scale deformation. The 3500 m thickness, coarseness, wedge shape, and association with an east-west trending fault zone suggest fault-controlled deposition of the LaHood Formation. Reynolds (M., 1977, oral commun.) ,proposed that an ero- sional escarpment may have been the sediment source for the LaHood Formation. It seems likely that any long-lived feature such as erosional escarpment which contributed 3500 m of sediment, would be in part structurally control­ led. The east-west trending fault zone along the southern margin of the Belt embayment was probably related to the 73 basin origin (Harrison and others, 1974; Boyce, 1975). Detailed discussion of the Belt basin origin is beyond the scope of this paper, and perhaps premature in that detailed, mapping, correlations, and environmental inter­ pretations of the Belt Supergroup have yet to be completed; however, possible origins will be briefly discussed in order to support the theory of fault-controlled deposi- ■ tion for the LaHood Formation. There are several ideas regarding the origin of the Belt basin. Harrison (1977; J., 1977, oral commun.) sug­ gested the basin was an epicontinental trough dominated by vertical tectonics. Epicontinental troughs slowly accumulate sedimentary sequences several kilometers thick by sediment loading and continual subsidence; however, mechanisms for subsidence in these basins are not well understood. if higher heat flow existed during the Pre-. Cambrian, thermal doming may have thinned lithospheric plates and domed areas may have undergone long-lived subsidence during and following removal of the heat sources (Fountain, D., 1978, oral commun.). Long-lived subsidence permits sediment thicknesses in excess of several kilometers to accumulate, possibly with little or no structural 74 control or igneous activity. The Belt Supergroup reflects subsidence and sediment accumulation of this magnitude. Harrison (J., 1977, oral commun.) considered the paucity of igneous rock in the Belt Supergroup as evidence against rifting in the Belt basin but this does not pre­ clude rifting or possible transform movement in portions of the basin. Harrison (1977) also calculated sedimen­ tation rates for various types oi basins and concluded that Precambrian Belt sedimentation was too slow for the basin to be a rift arm basin. It may be valid to con­ sider the 600 m.y. span of Belt deposition as relatively continuous, but hiatuses are abundant and rock packages in the supergroup reflect pulses of sedimentation. The sedi­ mentation rates for the pulses of deposition may well have been rapid. Rapid sedimentation rates may not characterize aborted rift arm basins through time, although one would expect rapid sedimentation during early stages of basin develop­ ment. Gross lithologic and stratigraphic features of the LaHood Formation point to rapid sedimentation for this portion of the Belt Supergroup and are consistent with most concepts of early stages of continental rifting. Fea­ tures of the two types of depositional sequences in the 75 limestone-rich LaHood interval such as beds of turbidity current and grain flow origin, and slump structures indi­ cate rapid sedimentation as well. Although the Belt Supergroup contains few igneous rocks, evidence such as Belt age and older faults, and abrupt thickness changes in Missoula Group rocks (Winston, D., 1979, oral commun.) suggests that basin configuration and deposition were structurally controlled. According to Stewart (1976, p. 12), "...extension appears to have taken place sporadically across the entire craton producing rift features and leading to emplacement of mafic intru­ sive and extrusive rocks." Aborted rift arm basins may form during initial stages of continental rifting (Hoffman and others, 1974). During rifting, two rifts are favored and may continue to spread and create oceanic crust, while the third is abandoned as a rift but continues to subside and receive sediment. Although aborted rift arm basins may resemble epicontinental troughs, most are orifented at high angles to the craton margin and are associated with ocean basins. Aborted rift arm basins may develop without genera ting oceanic crust (Hoffman and others, 1974). The Belt basin lies along the boundary between two rifted continental blocks and the embayment is 76 parallel to a major east-west trending fault zone (Fig. 2). Precambrian strike-slip faulting and reactivation along those faults throughout geologic time' indicate a major crustal weakness was associated with the basin. The basin may have been associated with a rift- rift-transform system analogous to the Benue Trough,, Africa or basins along the San Andreas fault zone. Oceanic transform faults undergo relatively little vol- canism compared to spreading ridges except during quiescent periods along the ridge related to changes in the direction of spreading (Ward, 1971). If the Belt basin formed along a continental transform fault, one might expect igneous activity to be absent or minimal. Casella (1979) and Schmidt and Garihan (1979) docu­ mented Precambrian movement on northwest-southeast trend­ ing faults. These faults end abruptly along an east-west line parallel to the present Willow Creek fault zone and the southern extent of the LaHood Formation (Fig. 2). Most LaHood Formation outcrops are faulted against pre-Belt metamorphic rocks along this zone and Reid and others (1975) described lateral offset in metamorphic rocks during the Preoairtbrian which indicates the fault zone could have influenced LaHood Formation deposition and was probably 77 reactivated during Laramide deformation. It is likely the northwest-southeast trending faults influenced deposition of the LaHood Formation (Schmidt and Garihan, 1979) and may reflect secondary shear stress generated by east-west lateral movement. 78 CONCLUSIONS (1) . Previous interpretations of the limestone-rich interval of the upper LaHood Formation in the Horseshoe Hills and Bridger Range have treated it as an unusual zone or "key horizon". While this interval is distinctive, it seems likely that the processes and environmental condi­ tions represented by the deposits were evident throughout deposition of the formation. The presence of other simi­ lar intervals in various stratigraphic positions in the formation of other areas supports this concept. (2) . The depositional sequences represent channel and interchannel deposits of a submarine fan system. The inter bedded limestone, siltstone, and shale of the interchannel deposits reflect both suspension deposition at the tails of turbidity currents and pelagic suspension deposition. The arkose beds in the interchannel deposits reflect turbid ity current deposition probably from channel spill-over. The arkose beds in the channel sequences are typical of proximal turbidite, transitional, and grain flow deposits on the lower-upper fan and middle fan segments of submarine fan systems. It is probable that migrating, distributary 79 channels undercut banks and initiated some slumping in the interchannel deposits. (3) Open-cast slump processes are typical of sub­ marine fans, particularly on the upper fan or upper-middle I fan. Although additional work is necessary in order to characterize the deformation in the limestone-rich inter­ val, much evidence points to open-cast slump processes related to both local and regional faulting. (4) The origin of the Belt basin is enigmatic and interpretations of the basin origin may be premature in that detailed mapping > stratigraphic correlations, and environmental interpretations of the Belt Supergroup have yet to be completed. The LaHood Formation reflects rapid deposition and subsidence, and the association with a major east-west trending fault zone and northwest-southeast trend­ ing faults together suggest the formation was deposited during long-lived tectonic instability. This is consis­ tent with, but not indicative of early stages of continen­ tal rifting at triple rift junctions or rift-rift-transform junctions. Additional study of the LaHood Formation, in particular, detailed study of the stratigraphy-and lithology of unusual or distinctive deposits within it, may provide information useful to. interpretation of the Belt basin origin. REFERENCES CITED Alexander, R. G., 1955, Geology of the Whitehall area, . Montana: Yellowstone-Bighorn Research Project, Contribution 195, 107 p. Bauerman, H., 1885, Report on the geology of the country near the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude west of the Rocky Mountains, from observation made in 1859-61: Canada Geological Survey. Rept. Progress 1882-84, B.. Bjidrlykke, Knut, 1973, Origin of limestone nodules in the lower Paleozoic of the Oslo region: Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, v. 53, no. 4, p. 419-433. Bjidrlykke, Knut, 1974, A reply. Origin of limestone nodules in the lower Paleozoic of the Oslo region: Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, v. 54, no. 4, p. 307 and p. 413-417. Blatt, H., Middleton, G., and Murray, R., 1972, Origin of sedimentary rocks: New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 634 p. Bouma, A. H., 1962, Sedimentology of some flysch deposits a graphic approach to facies interpretation: Amsterdam, New York, Elsevier Publishing Company, 168 p. ^Boyce, R. L., 1975, Depositional systems in the LaHood Formation, Belt Supergroup, Precambrian, south­ western Montana: Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 247 p. Casella, C. J., 1979, Definition and extent of the Pre- cambrian Beartooth Mountains, Montana and Wyoming: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs, v. 11, no. 6 p. 268. Corbett, K. D., 1973, Open-cast slump sheets and their relationship to sandstone beds in an upper Cambrian, flysch sequence, Tasmania: Jour, Sed. Petrology, v. 43, p. 147-159. 81 Cossey, S . P. J., and Ehrlich, R., 1979, A conglomeratic, carbonate flow deposit, northern Tunisia: a link in the genesis of pebbly mudstones: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 49, p. 11-23. Dapples, E. C., Krumbein, W. C., and Sloss, L. L., 1948, Tectonic control of lithologic associations: Am. Assoc. Petroleum, Geologists Bull., v. 32, p. 1924- 1947. Davies, I. C., and Walker, R. G., 1974, Transport and deposition of resedimented conglomerates: and Cap Enrage Formation, Cambro-Ordovician, Gaspe, Quebec: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 1200-1216. Donaldson, J. A., 1976, Paleoecology of Conophyton and associated stromatolites in the Precambrian Dismal Lakes and Rae groups, Canada: in Developments in Sedimentology 20, Stromatolites, Walter, M. R., ed., Amsterdam., Oxford, New York, Elsevier Publish­ ing Company, 790 p. Dzulynski', S., and Walton, E . K., 1965, Sedimentary fea­ tures of flysch and greywackes: in Development in Sedimentology 7, Dzulynski, S., and Walton, E . K., eds., Amsterdam, London, New York, Elsevier Publish­ ing Company, 274 p. Franks, P. C., 1969, Nature, origin, and significance of cone-in-cone structures in the Kiowa Formation (early Cretaceous), north-central Kansas: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 39, p. 1438-1454. Gebelein, C . D., and Hoffman, P., 1973, Algal origin of dolomite laminations in stromatolitic limestone: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 43, p. 603-613. ^ Harrison, J. E., Griggs, A. B., and Wells, J. D., 1974, . Tectonic features of the Precambrian Belt basin and their influence on post-Belt structures: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 866, 15 p. 82 rt5^ arrison, J. E., and Reynolds, M. W,, 1976, Western United States continental margin— a stable platform dominated by vertical tectonics in the late Pre^ Cambrian: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs, y. 8, no. 6, p. 905. Hawley, D., 1973, Sedimentary environment of the LaHood Formation, a southeastern facies of the Belt Super­ group, Montana: in Belt Symposium, v. I, Dept, of Geology, University of Idaho, and Idaho Bureau of Mines and Geology, Moscow, Idaho, 322 p. Hawley, D., and Schmidt, C., 1974, Some aspects of the LaHood Formation and structure in the Jefferson Canyon area: Tobacco Root Geol. Soc. Guidebook, p. 151-165. Helwig, J., 1970, Slump folds and early structures, northeastern Newfoundland Appalachians: Jour. Geology, v. 78, p. 172-187. ' .pV- Hendry, H. E., 1973, Sedimentation of deep water con­ glomerates in lower Ordovician rocks of Quebec- composite bedding produced by progressive ligui- faction of sediment?: Jour. Sed. Petrology, 43, p. 125-136. Henningsmoen, Gunnar, 1974, A comment. Origin of lime­ stone nodules in the lower Paleozoic of the Oslo region: Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, v. 54, no. 4, p. 413. Hoffman, P., 1976, Environmental diversity of middle Pre- cambrian stromatolites: in Developments in Sedi- mentology 20, Stromatolites,. Walter, M. R., ed., ■ Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier Publishing Company, 790 p. Hoffman, P., 1976, Stromatolite morphogenesis in Shark Bay, western Australia: in Developments in Sedimentology 20, Stromatolites, Walter, M. R., ed.., Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier Publishing Company, 790 p. I 83 Hoffman, P., Dewey, J. P., and Burke, K., 1974,' Aulacogens and their genetic relation to geosynclines with a Proterozoic example from Great Slave Lake, Canada: in SEPM Spec. Pub. No. 19, Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedimentation, Dott, R. H., and Shaver, R. H., eds.,380 p. Horodyski, R. J., 1976, Stromatolites in the middle . Proterozoic Altyn Limestone, Belt Supergroup, Glacier National Park, Montana: in Developments in Sedimentology 20, Stromatolites, Walter, M. R., ed., Amsterdam, Oxford, New York, Elsevier Publish­ ing Company, 790 p. Hudson, J. D., 1978, Concretions, isotopes, and the dia- genetic history of the Oxford clay (Jurassic) of central England: Sedimentology, v. 25, p. 339-371. Keith, B. D., Friedman, G. M., 1977, A slope-fan-basin plain model, Taconic sequence, New York and Vermont: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 47, p. 1220-1242. Kelling, G., and Williams, B . P . J., 1966, Deformation structures of sedimentary origin in the lower lime­ stone shales (basal Carboniferous) of south Pembrokeshire, Wales: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 36, p. 927-939. Kendall, A. C., 1977, Fascicular-optic calcite: a replace­ ment of bundled acicular carbonate cements: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v.. 47, p. 1056-1063. Kendall, A. C., and Tucker, M. E., 1973, Radiaxial fibrous calcite: a replacement after acicular carbonate: . Sedimentology, v. 20, p. 365-389. Kuenen, Ph. H., and Menard, H. W., 1952, Turbidity currents, graded and nongraded deposits: Jour. Sed. Petrology v. 22, p. 83-96. Kuenen, Ph. H., and Migliorini, C . I., 1950, Turbidity ; currents as a cause of graded bedding: Jour. Geology, v. 58, p. 91-127. 84 Lowe, D. R., 1976, Subaqueous liquified and fluidized sediment flows and their deposits: Sedimentology, v. 23, p. 289-309. Lowe, D. R., and LoPiccalo, R . D., 1974, The character­ istics and origins of dish and pillar structures: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 484-501. McMannis, W. J.., 1963, LaHood Formation- a coarse facies of the Belt Series in southwestern Montana: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 74, p. 407-436. McMannis, W. J., 1965, Resume of depositional and struc­ tural history of western Montana: Am. Assoc. Petro­ leum Geologists Bull., v. 49, p. 1801-1823. Middleton, G. V., 1970, Experimental studies related to problems of flysch sedimentation: in Flysch Sedi- mentology in North America, LaJoie, J., ed., Geol. Assoc. Canada Spec. Paper 7, 272 p. Monty, Cl., 1977, Evolving concepts on the nature and the ecological significance of stromatolites: a review: in Fossil Algae, Fliigel, Erik, ed., Berlin, Heidel­ berg, New York, Springer-Verlag, 375 p. Mutti, E., 1977, Distinctive thin-bedded turbidite facies and related depositional environments in the Eocene Hecho Group (south-central Pyrenees, Spain): Sedi- mentology, v. 24, p. 107-131. Nelson, C . H., and Nilsen, T. H., 1974, Depositional trends of modern and ancient deep-sea fans: in SEPM Spec. Pub. No. 19, Modern and Ancient Geosynclinal Sedi­ mentation, Dott, R. H., and Shaver, R. H., eds., 380 p. Normark, W. R., 1978, Fan valleys, channels, and deposi­ tional lobes on modern submarine fans: characters for recognition of sandy turbidite environments: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 62, p. 912-931. Peale, A. C., 1893, The Paleozoic section in the vicinity of Three Forks, Montana: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. H O , 56 p. 85 Peryt7 T. M., and Piatkowski., T. S., 1977, Stromatolites from the Zechstein limestone (upper Permian) of Poland: in Fossil Algae, Fliigel, Erik, ed„, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Springer-Verlag, 375 p. Raiswell, R., 1971, The growth of Cambrian and Liassic concretions: Sedimentology, v. 17, p„ 147-173. Rautman, C. A., and Dott, R. H., 1977, Dish structures formed by fluid escape in Jurassic shallow marine - sandstones: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 47, p. 101-106. Reid, R. R., McMannis, W., and Palmquist, J., 1975, Pre- cambrian geology of North Snowy block, Beartodth Mountains, Montana: Geol. Soc. America Spec. Pub. No. 157, 135 p. Reinecke, H. E., and Singh, I. B., 1975, Depositional sedimentary environments: New York, Heidelberg, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 439 p. Rocheleau, M., and LaJoie, J., 1974, Sedimentary struc­ tures in resedimented conglomerate of the Cambrian flysch, L 1 Islet, Quebec Appalachians: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 44, p. 826-836. Schmidt, C., and Garihan, J., 1979, A summary of Laramide basement faulting in the Ruby,. Tobacco Root and Madison ranges and its possible relationship to Precambrian continental rifting: Geol. Soc. America Abs. with Programs, v. 11, no. 6, p. 301. Schumm, S . A., 1968, Speculations concerning paleohydrologic controls of terrestrial sedimentation: Geol. Soc. of America Bull., y.. 79, p. 1573-1588. Stauffer,. P. H., 1967, Grain flow deposits and their impli­ cations, Santa Ynez mountains, California, Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 37, p. 487-508. Stewart, J . H., 1.976, Late Precambrian evolution of North America: plate tectonics implication: Geology, January 1976, p. 11-15.. 86 Trunk, F. J., and Smith, D. L., 1979, Soft sediment defor­ mation of laminated algal carbonates of the LaHood Formation (Precambrian Y), southwestern Montana: Geol. Soc. America, Abs. with Programs, v. 11, ho. 6, p. 304. Verrall, P., 1955, Geology of the Horseshoe Hills area, Montana: Ph.D. Thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 261 p. Walcott, C. D., 1899, Precambrian fossilferous formations: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 10, p. 199-244. Walker, R. G., 1966, Shale grit and Grindslow shales: transition from turbidites to shallow water sediments in the upper Carboniferous of northern England: Jour. Sed. Petrology., v. 36, p. 90-114. Walker, R. G., 1975, Generalized facies models for resedimented conglomerates of turbidite association: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v* 86, p. 737-748. Walker, R. G., 1977, Deposition of upper Mesozoic resedi- . mented conglomerates and associated turbidites in southwestern Oregon: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 88, p. 273-285. Walker, R. G.,. 1978, Deep-water sandstone facies and ancient submarine fans: models for exploration for strati­ graphic- .traps: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull. v. 62, p. 932-966. Ward, P. L., 1971, New interpretation of the geology of Iceland: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 82, p. 2991- 3012. Weeks, L. G., 1953, Environment and mode of origin and facies relationships of carbonate concretions in shales: Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 23, p. 162-173. Wentworth, C. -M., 1967, Dish structure, a primary sedi­ mentary structure in coarse turbidites: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., Cabs.), v. 51, p. 485. 87 Williams, G. E., 1966, Planar cross-stratification formed by the lateral migration of shallow streams; Jour. Sed. Petrology, v. 36, p. 742-746. **5** SiAremu>twb(?smt ^xaozgMAtt •5Cc.T. 5 3ZO X Z ' /4b/3-f_S.4#. / 4 / 6 "Vf /4 /..Cl /fooci fCfrthy f'iG r J t i i iui-Z 3 OfiftL ~t / f f / 3/ j 7 Qi/c a ffasc ' p iU ly f rzU /v t/y Jn c 3rf' /3 i f)^ i/jo AjpniCsIk /f C ^ J-C ; /r/J'r’j . tfif CcKC- 5/> Uc 4 3 s^a & f I11^ tJ ^ f z l / f ^ sctr' ■ P 3oo / I X "Jo ; - T - T C c or* c-s<--h /rhA- j h HfIa / Lic JpiAt 5/J U f r t !,/unZ^nU Jiy 0 p tlo/i-oa/c a >j, si J U C/c : CjfefiP p O-^ost tf/oAf poO*(rCz^ t\4vlli H li Cj/C-tsU fj/tKU T./c&t //" * 'Yyniphrprf s/iH-hht Jf Jrikf (prkopt ^ i / e p p i j . , h r ; r n - -Stiit v- 6.X CfiCtrmKeJ su'y-i) dk TTau Iolk *> -H f 3 h. fflk J / Orj, 3 Cftict 5€ Cco-'ISo or/oOnS Ja tr-t V- be ZbVLT"Jjb ~ fj) crt'/e A- ISipJBt OYi. sofntwhiTr MtiCe Ct sH-PsfTt j A*- . Z*u /i Tc SlA qh/io .’V .iiL. rtf S'* Zr$»X tyiJi r f i / .d k r tnfers 5^/>t Aj Vt/- v'S W j W ■ petf-C. -Jv-Ii lij 64tj a tJeSg Sejt rf ~ T lo3z ,■v\ iV-e. /n J rU c f c k 'p f / j f j - h j n r j. i d J j r / u j 'O k c&L w.i.fCfnpu'e U wctrtf cfs O. fry 14*n. ,J j Urky /-SStUi 4 JoLfU cn/cGrt*v5 y*j UKjrt / C rVer-t 4 Ppvertfj pohfu I JktY- >t*E Mt ■ ' { /0 ■1 M J * o -/ZZzZYZ SE rtf /IFfr * - W L ArHJ 'b*f I, tickoSe. jol s r t^hy PUnLf^fiiir*** itrJpSt) p c U fy If IficCt /YV1 CHCt c HS LJtie C-JOtMeP n i k I bdf /t jOj-cIl Co 'Cr Of-';. Y->/ lit Hout nicklrt^ J fVt.tr,Sj pert f Scr e /IUCtittr H } JOp CoHfSt ( pe Obiy , CtX Lc, Cl ri oSe. p._ 4\ Ay (if Po st Hg-rI IirttfbddwJa tf. UCjraLf, MjUrt /s U uses, < CLski Pc' Jhtfhdd /nc far Mctk tj AfkeSt /,I 5d / bLt -JAy Aj f Cti ICMfJ. pi bbUfjoHtS ifi a iv At nS* pC j L. Jr,Mi. rsvef z r TO H Sf Jpf^tkrh S-Hijtd AfTj PA/a /'(Ziti / UpprC L /c rt&r Si Jc s I Jc iMh' Js -ciihce z /- M U 77‘ H , . nttf'C SriUeixt at .^oJarlfifi d //2- f/s X/Vc Aa M/$ S TAEMNOFM P /Mpi'ft, P o 'h ly arj. see. Jtoji.* m // Xtrt H H irtjiT-s 4 SCijrt-I 5h G j^7 to ah Jr /o&k'iij I At-//*. Jrtd?/ JrtpSf /-Tit'/S rfartJ'brtdf- ( s H / t A<-d notes) J appiturs 4c Ce dip rtiAMjc-.. Cdu fd ht MtVAfad LP r-mrt^ tnCt urdf/J/rtf bed%/t kcdsH &*H Jtfv 4 Hh Tnqr d p A pc kbit rMK e nH ti Ho ns bdd fhckntes 4.XIom30//lt VC J d e w n_) /C ctoi fnbutdr 'h C^ 3A5 € y j G €cp GA'd nee V- H iCiT MlT^SiHtAy,, , Jtost QWf ktijj Jii/y Crtst-bearcue be ZZ uic Cent*Hs - U A a ch J d Uhturi A I i . (Jotye'* -'KCt l4i-!5 -Jr-' JjCc tj z * r Iti i'fQ$4 f 'Jci-yf,: --C-iX- AjrfI-'* »e >■r’/ / ^ f s & , r & T-F G i* ' C Fe. : « > + . y r J t t /hr.-iu- W*-^- J f - j / j JctG iJ^ Z ju C< X ) O B R A i - . ^ MC^ XatiA STA^ E J NIVERSiSS A p fe n it t t 5 ! I SfLAC- A I I >- f ' ClT JtcS-L JJcLL j r I t Z f3 ' i t - u i f i J / / z I t i s i f 7 Ai Z3O f X / ( , m m /4fc : # # vo ^ s w r ~ /$3 C /0 5 ZiA/ CftcYt Jestf• fiCi1J ZJeP1 Y'/oCt - Y- Piitct 7 C y c l i c SC fHC^ltL JS«5 -*l£ jtu T •' '“ FE z. ^ a ^ c r e -A b r f fb/ /Jp/a rJost ren/se f wS$/v<£ a.Zo^Ci ut:dif(a Jtn/^ Jri-Z irh^d t d/i C /x.Xy Jast Stt(J)Jf y^A'/ieC CrCSfJ A > e / d f d , tiA HJ-' - I i / tA "zS ^ )C**i>S. f r & r t /> • ft 53/Ve //-I / t t - s s p > Se c A t* * Vi t ,cUhd s JlshiU lflt fbej* ; Cu J u S t^ U . d i / isrtA Cd & iJ tiA Af u tt ’ /V J I r J i r b t d U i d A rJ fS <- rr J j j t s J A t r Y - j S uch c t, purt] irh-ri-tZs Kiar ft-u. -,JdrdAJittrf p u r JstTft >5 J V- A /te>St_ J jt if // 'Y S -Z Y r f f d i t r 1 J iu A J r J d erf i/ /}i a. t-n Vc "^l^ TZ^ Ct Vi— 0 Z ^ r jj C r i-u tir /A t- f p i Jrbtj j iu e . i f f / / t i ‘ • b t r t & / / . pun /cy etrAosz. 1 Y r /m s J , f x l l j (F rU yJ rt ifa n t- tZ u * ' jpriifjj' ^nYd< 54, ScyU-* '4 Vr,u c sT ' dr/ces*- centinuru*, t-y//<>- a*fy poe - r ty U pose J J . > -T % s it - /eSc P 'HC/ w Ft-U J-. (dst- —sr> Oyd c Sty 14. / , / f . 5, * /Tc OJA ~ A d ! / DlTA eastOtdr- C rUst p >r A /ict' JtAra SihnpJLyUr Y / Z 6 V h dcta — ^ . -r r^Ac Vi/ S liti t / - v ,, zri.-JsuJ r a - s A t i i p i M t i r r ,Tz ' Ir-rtyh Y A - S*rL t 6» \ roJu '$ lx-,& *\. C I JAadt*'KUlJttTHA./ 4 i t I f - J rrU i J l'(Th * '»<4 C fT r^ u f ' tr* / ' J ~ j Px-- Vs f / Z j ' /30 Ury d / d + tfd i**- £ ro **' A t J L t~uJ Cs LictiJteY^j HCCethdaffS . JJefry JsYJthCy oAoMfK /urt Ttf-CCdLaMtfi/f Jdunfu / VdsJfy !.HfC-Ijf Ci J ^»/u 3 Jc n Zu rhc I \ a P t SIM A y\‘ h<3 i p f Ce~T--> f-t y i x rtfr h-J> e p ( t/U t. cOnCt .- o o p r u t f (P i J rfr Jc d A JJLh Y ' L-r-C y J Cyt(>C ' e \ u. > f < e >-v f Lv /-tffti'dt> Ve r-k ij d o ^ z ' / j Seckcril £. t /3 ' Azrj p .n c j j s u e // * A * TroetrJaJ po~/rfiy ASp' 3 1 el S>/in J A ( r HCttihfrh-a,ra '•f/i n dtvCj '* ; LteRAKt MPMTiNA STATE UhlVEhStF -— pvyFMAli CS r f H e f!orst'ko<~ ffuh StCficn CL / - / f ' r / , / g / Y / ' ; . La ( to o / L b nH A t ^ *- A f i r i i i it.€ 3 ^ m t P f d i k L- B 3/7 / -v / / r A ; p i /, ( I j H S ' AstfKfi p.,JtaU- S i rn ~F L ' / f - n 's T 3 0 9 ' tjk (UlO, y-c (/7/xZ- f> te l* cCC . :<-f (/(TiS ^ - t-ff.-i * wt. JtflOf \ J t i yP-< 4 6 Cj StjL*-* C f r t t . C o ic r tk i-X a t ) f r jc p u S rp c fr C f \ £ o c f ^ 2 ^ I — ^ XL ' ^ a l l n • S 3 > /Sc'23c' "CA1CliLS** u , / &ckttroth s fihii/iu Jv % ‘j'tS hett/oC) JrtA-tH CH-Zii ClJfx , /. pp-*-* «■><■/ y y..> tt-vt* f / r< o f La (a Ltex et ptyhoK m- 3Irf^ " ^f {L AiZ-Av- L (i 'ii i L h OitV*- Ccff-OiL ’**E2 CijcMit. $ . y * / f / , uxL^'ohff C^ Wif/tf / ^ y A ^ -rr fiuttfioe- c^r ( , S L i CyCIul U tJM jitHu - /* i£c2ajj Ssrfr exL ) / v f r o H-I/ f y ■J’ f a u td/tK /jJL Q bUj 0-tZzW V. / 3 3 ' / 3 / ^pvnfut trrlc*j-<_ *r /ftput0 f jrc j Ltrisf OnusJcxi CitAjr nL' /3t'} Jhhl J-Atx Aitif ten FDR CHAD Srt TTLt ‘ , / ft , Cu / d PftAfUj />Mfhr UiX LlVj f JktUjL^, ' 1 //S CrtKStcr/S'Cj3 ruri (cUsH- Lra^ CA S tcH tn A ) ' IrL oS t pokes T i'/ './ J a i t i f / Z o ' • ; r : 'V .> .- • V . HU j l»i- U M H - Ir rJ . Io ( ' / /J //Osff1 HtUs j c c r t r ta foe TSrJsSrA ■t° osf \ : _ _. /SHc' f ( ' ) \ ;--Ty=C= 5 3 ' f TIX=T- ^ 4 ■ 4 \ \ y » 5<»z/u: Ce'H , / -t SJLCfrL Si C r ta it. / t OLtOfyfrti ipnro- /t r y , Cfrr** Vd/fd V ^ 6 6 ^ /477 InhrfetfHtH ujpunku- CL 'H o P t t u r j - M i / V Y fHnu/c. ' V S a Cu s J -S 0 ‘ ) r cu 'C < -c A vQ rCJoAi /rp L i t &> &*s J - -ULi0S / U v < ' 5 4) 35-jo f Jifr Ui1 pan Hnji f(Htsif) CijCfrC 5 S f ucc £ ( Oluppjl a m - C a i . L 'f-. N L FSO fr-rl • Va ryfC-LJf d p u n iji f arrfeSt. rOuud/L norf), a IajHj *^ //v COrtau: /u% H* >\ ' Hjp , / J ArfaSt /AgS&oCtf p * c JcJ r r i t s j— Z--J / J1Q : Ifhd A-rJrfVi . p L rtrfcyixulds A AjIJu itkLe Av Uptg-i i S r fn k f A s -d 7A r . lfa t iU ) .? SorHOiohiH /ry fr fa r S t l iH t f r A f r Si JVen f GAt. >Jvciu oct-u rr/iUCt f OCa/CAi Jc * Cfl-fC’dtf k l ^ > A?/- C d fis j C r i j b i t f t h 'J d j L tdHtd H f n /(VijQ . A f< / Z h^jfMjLj 'crest, h CrC-'j c * Cftji ono-ey, ia pd 1H fro ' Jr PSf. Jtfrynud c u / i k* (Ce p M T T /jte j-vJ / 6 Sty / I LMkinfil ]) 2 / nidUfJ-if / ^arW 0/7 d rtu/fr pVsktf C'Vypicfr C Jet*.- W tin1 . H A M f /H v t i f' rA - i- -s H fr J f r ThfJs -W V--TjtrfJf^•- >r’ . ~IMI --1------ DBRART MCtoYjtA STATE UNIVrpgrw SOZEMAN H o A.'1 'rOC3 //$.',?/;/ r / j f i / i e t , I B c r r t f H i - / ) &V FIGU RFE&&l D SECf.V rr-r - - --Zr-/- ‘i X& t' -nirT- E - -: - TV1 ’ -r:"S5SS."i I Cl / / ' ( -la h - r TMCt i_ j /A) - z^y r ('OfybuJ 'CifCltc J it jf L h h f f >jj j j '/u' SW C^ vy6, i ' Jtjb Ct^ l u ( ( y i i f - f &y a.D c 4-w >< cc/ /y, Jf. H Zf-Or/ Af^ G&i& n j iu c f 4'S> J io r h i //ut^ v ZZc ^ ^ 5; / ' Ar// r H L c f k t J [ s [ ( t J t j f f c A s k - f c - y ^ Juk> C/UrifOHA t / Uf3 V3- r a - f - t j { ( I $s c/- / (A Jf/L0 h fi / LjJa >t y/iftyPA)^ /v^<3 ilu^r /ru r // i Jco s&t ^ t k Li: A ^ -j^c e~>vj-a C-fs L x rZ p/ 5 ; flbL j M ? ^ U jk f A j f /ts J f f tS r /C) H /t-Lt Zr /y /3 H i5 CCrH/,r tu m 'S / s f Y fl-J i-j f f k h i t - GCY tthJyH iG tC f , , Ac Ooa c f a f H ) p tV fO c:r Z tvJk rk ihJG fL iij - j j j j h d f fi c U <*— 1 s L i f d , Z/6 / a f c c t c c -> i-h (.L f fi4 CTLf Yffi ^MtMi t( f&7'CS Ctnhi K ps.[ z& />x -y^ - tc on t (-* t s I/O Zoo rb uD o - /5oV ZcoV r " rA1T r_ : ■- - - W wmu= ■ ^ ,* A m 'A - - , • 7 ? ,f: \ y? /%) ! a** I W O u f OS I j & ~ j j . H j uS p u t ^ k j A fi:os<__ >yiBy-LC K* Cfu+? J ^ iJhirci-j ct/cLc > OC/Hit IC J . C H r b . C p i i C h o t jci tufj O L Jcth-t_ J So-f JcrJl i> Ijt iLj p u K Lusr Cfufc :Z M * 1 f i t ' I--Cif 6» - J (T\-< S ' p n i J Z A ^>f e X -4////K Cz»yHL-t-T!V>3 L Lerns J , 6 / / UkdL-A fc\£-, ~L y C U o f f rnf Ai /siiuJxiti ^ r - ' J rrO ? SLprCttfctrix tfcfcr h J fH iT V t /! ' /g f ) 9 5 c i U^ A % -- C r n c H f c a y t r > Mf- Lifc ZfGtfcLop I h - -L G ru s L H ot j )f HO , * ■: t //O xV ■ L i ! - - n ' /5 D . - -1 ; j •»/(: Hj pi - J • tcy StJYtJr (Gf a >y . / i/c; ff'/y •/• J' p Li r l i f t j d fc d Ju / ; /. '-..J. Jirf ^ c r?x$t_ : pc JkClj Zla t o s t , / 5( ih-h»£ C / ’H u (L J ^ t f h A d c A p IO C f JlrifGJi <• rfy ; Oi ifcsfcayu. .» v v>:-v;^ 55< OL f, -- ’--Vf .JifctSt- , *>u4Ut»\h y-b$d% * • C-I -'t > /. *' ; //(t\ Ct L i f i f ■ - - Vi--J. . v ilS "v j HlVt HlfUs A-JtJL- ,J i f d a - / a fc c r j A rt Sa-A f CfJJo irt L Jr J- T * < (x / / '• - A IU r O * ■ c r t A - t ' ^ r r.c iUj W-)' a / / Ac/5 . . Z4 iy A Se kO(f IOtth Lijfc hiith V b f V-Q t ' fcoJt jt A Ss - f t j C m , * 5 L >-V %.« UXT //5 '//i- V Ajt'/1/ i f - / j as ' QeunHtfcrij foj-Zfifc ’ ‘ Afct--L' 3} CU/f c CPss o ih A t 4 A , ' I? r/eZZ ( iv CS-h I ] U t r ^ p f c u t t f f c i f c P c f c L tc r o /f Cfct'afc afc I r iS u i f hJ i /5 5 s * v / /4/ f t u Itfce A /a rift ZrlcfhaA tJr y h p i z*» I yo . v *. Ar U /O A -i b '£ CL: S ' " / ^ <-JEsrtP & rZ f/ « Ai t i f f y j i m i - C A k ■ ' - *\ • -. t*QCl(rif ',cha// CUj, cfcesfcs cn*YiiVt ji Acsrl Ztntit/afc jrsj • I-6 Ui 1Mia-V (ja Z ecu'’■ ufcc •/>!// UfGCzc SZf-Ji A t jp a / a. I b i j G r L c n , p u r f c j ii # & fc: I * mC L T -' ZfCa rf crsiSscVe- z •' s (■ ft ,\ Jhk txj-i.i c jkfM { fa 'pc ) O /ii bccrCiu C j /c fCliC S^lU ‘ CtrAiie A* 1/QS J I1 Cj r 'Cl

5< eft free rC-Hcrr-J ZB ' C Af OPu ^ t f c d o f c'?/y f Zr :-' / - .Y - ,O • V \ a-i frost. Z f ih rbU U cJcyCi I StCn C-HUft U f i / C f ' - ~b r ' f c i GA >f I J pcfHj GtpcSbd , V/ - «5 DBRAmr MSSSiHA STATE UmVERSCS SPZEMAN u' £ H o r s e s U t / r / U J e M 0,, £ - f r c k . M r k A- £4Ki€A ftt ~ Z w t h i 0 - rT r ^ , V■) tSr>b < f ^iTl < Afi£ y) / ; W - ^ 4 y g/, I ^ / c-y^pif- r ^ WyZ £ ‘ i*T" 52CI ? 3 3 1 :W 6 ■ V m J ^6b - ^ 4 " 6 Sc! ^ r / / o - - : 20O r-':;— T^ — ZJCZ- : /^ >& b) /W " f— /5o i /Z r //& ! •, /00 9° jALJSSZ*-- I bo Z k k i Zc M i i M -TT ■; , 5o I , it , k -•>- \ Zo • UV i ^ l l ■ ■ ; /4 I-. : . " . y . T-I^ rrm -. 'I . ' - J p u h k+ f I QpU l /b' , t j L ■ c* > 6. ift '*<- X >y l l i t i ta.okb%z fj Itjt . jk jp C*- tt. * I C l t - Aii 1yz /v j a L / Ajtpf & >$ 53Z 6t_ urk/od4 U)j tin (i /MtXJC OL tic 5A M jio tI 243 - IMi yof tUrJ PM C Ynp A'Z fr>M , arJ ) ^y- ' / f A T ^, f P J f t - j %b nu Ao Co 'fa ' P irtlr A / ^ 7 / Cu ' 66 / / 5 4 « , 'C^ "l V //? X', y/rjjt: 2 Coty fUitif j UU' L Uftfi I Z tM jh f I tiJj CfCt-UftKlTU shPiS lc f f KCti i f o t i t j f /A*' A Um uU yyjincS 't/'d CcfiMtC f 2 Kfit t is I /JuptifiJ C tjf-U-J MiA a p t i M ' 7/ fo6 j U r re. x * h iLtf yh J Jy i Ik mfc M -U t y -/ pUJrU- OyH. . , ^ /O t' f C( Lyt a ^ » JX OAnxUj, suxu h -0(1^ rr Oxpi r A'J A S Ayjsltictf , U 4 zz^ k r ix— oI i f On■ m yj 5 ) /tfY f tit, Li -Wy -ovn f t j J ij & r Ltf-. • J J K C ■ • ZZ OS i h ,I f i t #± ■ J o » u A t i t „ ^ HcbUt , ' O / Y LdfLitJ Jv-Uu ct,s A tU K A r f L r i f H V f f i x J - r o * / / V / / ^ f)'" ^ Af/^A /TC- ’ /lrfkf JCC H.uSS'sf -JiiAjilrUL /'-L " " ' - - / ... V\V Vf ' 'L. - ( MfierUinr 01 u ^ r OUt U C /in U j tftjj i f J C p l > t Sf Jju “. 7 XTA^ jhJfi, LteJi / / r J c f u t C A t L m a f U u it ox C ldrifit - Sr , , . „Uj AtL9rL- Au At Lu e> 44 Afi f i n I C 'l -A Jficd K lA L r j f i i i p Ic 1 l^pt3'hG^ re sr t 5 « > j f vU«A n- JS crt r C > jp>cj nP d- if- Lu j-o J rp UiA s 'f ^Arrpi b h ip t JXffT-C JlA pC lilA t- p J t tie f f i t SO I Ur 4t Ot Bi -Jtif C tT Oig LirOft _ CfiUuttl 7 v IfTkAr' CK A f j hAkn-, J1 tin / * —* Ho ex* -> 6 i I - / /M ^ /Se ' / A to jo a-) Lx ft h He ft O C. A-fiJyrHfitit A c Ce , Vf Vfi J j Jjx: H . 4X1/ u. Cfi-Y > ' 4-f itifi-fi Cd-ub , 6* Ja Aap t CL z ti i , A L ^ tia r Aj,*-t /11 Mep i Kuu > At> op f t ■ a.,J C r iC lA (C tLAfiftbtJ O x l O S ftif i j H Mt)//] (tenet S n y C x r^ Siiio- QAih .Au eh ft -jAufi f t ; Slcn K-Cx j Jy /sec 5 /f, ,X4 /x We. • ,vt / < tiSnn- O rjd tVL Zfi r JLi c Juc HtfiJo 77 y Cjpf r Cx*h MKfh LyiJo Sii C/ti 1 tiu J irJ AtJUi a >p '/. ., - V / f A ttibtc j - (t b i f J ifpY fiift , VtfJj J, M/A X f t J. k J o c f iJ I cC$HCL.< c S S i . UF r &D n n t k i i i i ( I t j i y u J S c - CfujJppJbb/H. Sb Wsr W C rSibktt Th i /* V - i4 . -rf' Jt-I $ A A « . .1 / ti I # 1 - W 7 A fx Aif y -A-v Z A C >'Zj. T ' J . C e I rcm 1 r -3 * w iv. j -- 7 r>h------H >ZAZ /^t-I>1 Ctk fLOO ■ [c-f-jc Yr rT CfiiMCh tike / / /? 6 4 7<->KV <*C -I A f y L , c IAfitiic J ik td I'- JttrCY U i-L jrffii I Ci Ud Jfi J i - * J . •C LCfffi CfiyxJi r( UCj Ji- t j CtoS - d-*kxrt( t fiflUt IrMfiCy O H ufflfifi-j t fU p .Virzz j j / l h c /> t f *c h — C H r jjfiU : A In Ifatii- I *O CrV V W p T T S K A STATE L W E fC IgaZEMAN P € 'U o r s e s H n U t i h 3 i c h o & c I xi fioo V1 p> vo iy '$ 1 ; e '!/ / ■ &r$. 0' 3 8 0 . •* I 36>o- /3*'/ < <' -f- > 5 -~v - - ' , : • ' ■ ' \ .*.V-•,'•■• I # -TT=TIZLT he ■ > ' m m / f 6 Z> 344% "/af 3/5-33J JS HbUj ^trA*-** , ,. f ' 4 Af r f d r l i ^ ^ p - 6 / a \ w / > ^ v J. ■ fti Olyi 7) j -Xyju &.* yf t6U A f (>t*U'- *J /fU& ifoA *** ty V // tesrkctf di. + . . . PtMHU'ZbK^ k k ik v r ■ / m CU* r X Md-P l it . -•» <6/r I Sf-4 /'/ -■ ■ » -He.'1 f- r ’ k ‘ \ VkAHL ' f riJ evid a - f - "',-^ rsfuvnjo I „.x ZrSjLyv-S^ -• V3J5- 3 /&'3 Z t i Si A r, /A rno in w w r Jfttihyi WZ- Li (Zfpa ri A n f$~r -H A l / iC./viM ( S s r r A I A A u t ^ j Pr f '-' • "US M ? ■ / f t - f a uZ rflf l L' I ' f tyo x/ '• z ,/ JfZ At -ftnbrfS C s S r t ■? } r nifg-itp :• -<*$i Svt3p-‘■'■ d ri(n - Z ^ y/ ^5> ifvhri, '4 e^ /.1 x t-h f> : / g 5 /Ar/;. s 'w - - wS > »> - Zt . T- -?, .'>< /7;' / . , ,. - . ■ Af, rttidvkJ an < /«*»us) T--Hfpfj ‘.JHiiJyWj 1 * Zt jt^ A. /4 Cei--Hfyit-CxM z*i( i f : t i i /.X- . - A & t ' v r / r J U y b i - JZi ,y. . . H L tf ' f f /$/> 'xtfrrf 4+4 Jiftft- t r /m n " ^Sooy; ^ 0 :-SI-ikwlSr3. l1- (trkttn hhb'’ JttfSi Mpvttts 4) MVt.. p p r hw<-ycn. U«f £ nrpi’fit A t Mtm /H /fr /«-n ViiihSfi f/jC (A t: Al- hZt 1 ) sFUbf& f/cn4f< p-,i 6 '<* Z/y ACpy'- Afl' UtMtC^nkiK Zy y//) - M (k bid tZ) O t H h h n - j i / / f t OPvAn.»■ t'-f J fff-': M if f f Mhrvr*/ AyeMni M m -+■ Sr 'ritst T) " 7 teSSkleiSiA STATE U hiIVERSfT? -, BQZEMAb A. ^ / ' 3 T . I f / " > /v ■ •/ '>Of{ f'OlTiVslr-s^ / [ j i d U i d 'K P 'V % ^ H I V - I A d n t t fM S o t u i t " S C -C-T. r " i g 1Xi \ / -jfi- t{ 6 -Aiu Tr* t^ y i ) C t - f b , W A-i ,f S -ut ^S. if I [/**>'^ ityJ ■•-' / A . : 4 ^ S j t f <- At- --• C A S f Pir* ^ z yC ^t .V 5^- ^ r / V-' -t'- Z C i V =CCd'' ■ I T l -f (># ;- a-; V 5» Z iA * - UO I" a T ,-.-f ,JirjT . -“ i -W ' f * b , Z B f ' 6 / " O 4 *4 ' c * e s T ; jr-rmcx: T * b t ' V 4 2v. -J , — m • - - r 'p - " T ____ A L / / t y 5>j < 6 v i- ^ i ! ' T C f , * o t n * k - S 5 C f f . T V tf;tb’ 5 ^ I'M. /z-ye- - f - U i r t U h is , , f , r $ Y - S A r p f i ^ L J b y . f C A « / y ^ ''Atcnz 'Jj -3 3 - = /50 Vy If /><- AzJ 1 . 0 0 - 2 S C t*fif 11* deb A IO/ Yf-o OfAhd S 'lh Arrc C C - C i f X -f/ / fZ(5A., sS t t i L l r t f i p v * d o t 5 * ' i M Y A M - I n A - ; 7 j w 6 f » -Qn V iycs il-Y t1 ' J e n l y > Z ^ o - Z l s i »cP •/> ,TiArAfjy S t p * U d rAfi-ft* A 1A f i i r * ' A I 7 * 7 j Y i <4/ y D V A l fA i t y r C - f t ( M A f - * Aifv- . TYpo i> zP. $ C f v r b - J M t l f '.I . X * A t A d S - M n HS I n tr ia f Seoyr / / Ctl ■ Ui C -MU 'U it M f 7 YVtlJ S iftu /*., At ,/tf d f u i f i ' •M t /Z (Z^ A t / //5-//V c c A p i n S J z , , , /t//. A, /(- O / kyt*- Z f Y d u i i j I f i t p i/z Vy A f f i r i - I $ y O f i - A f V cZL Q Znl C * . j c - L c_ ;’f k ws fix. d o p - i L 4-,Y U . Y t f v d i A y j - c-ids - j ZUbwer V v p CiyAft 0 rl -jiff’Cz Pjd 4 rfiuvLj AtHin ^ t Y ifufirt LiifiritcJtLiJ 'hfipArj- ‘C f - f i L - j / x n y : k b i t I Office I > § 4 f/u. ^ finr&tclVy ^ :' v<4 C i m C Y t f i " H s YiffiiOjcr5 mfiuhfi ch ! , } 1 ' , f f i ' A l f M f i n r h A f i ' fiy Lfii {it u Jfivi 7 u Jli A Yttg H.Aronf f i l - A } * ,*//? W h i f i d 4 m A fit LU-A ( I ) cM. f QfjkMi.; A t f i o i t t o r , -: . H - U 7 LC - Y f i - I s /i. / fif-ti H V^yM- XiYffififiLl ^ 5 » MT IficP ;C Lfipfi *f 1 • Stni-Hsi ft.Lfii1 fi ,Y f rrct -v Cu ffi* * &*/fif33 Lffir- iTriP- t s J S /?zX«f p a W P O Y f i r U M i J j C P J . 7 ■ C MI la L y t r disfis-+. JffiMu Acfiuci1Uj ^ y C A - l t C C e i f L f i j i 7 J i v u V p d i Q t X i r nuitJbU X &*<£d ^ ^ JiUdfiit irP j / , P r Z e 4 s Y / p U f i f i f i atfi, XrtidJri1 ■ A CMIfiyAjl r i f t SH fftIp f C f y j d f m i S t r p y / / 5 S V - J P i W U j - C f t M U A r f i r t f i lp h A tK) 1 S r t h t - / 1 y n C t y i v i a M Q Y k r t A y ' K A - M t * V u ck p i A > j sVirico\ -J ir f iu i d tab. 'flrfi< J r r J f i j f i e c m CYftfiiTK Art ij *n UJrifffi 6ifUL H f a U Y >Vy CMfirs. ft ^ t v m r P ! f t _ f L Z15 1 V>ft'>A*e„ /€5, 4 -WwS « 1 V o a r f f i - * V o S t C J M n t j f c o v f t - f v j ^ J t j f t f i k f i t i f ft, f QfUesfi ConCnAthQitf / j i / - ^ H o n - C a f c . C v n i s 5« lA f if ta v h o J , v / d - P b J f P j l U f i ' O H - r , U V C u c . I ' ' i -5 *?« * Y Y f t f H t j J f Y S t j f i f t L> • C rx r b . Y t j P i - H 1C , C a A . M j s Z r t f Y f - L t Y f f r U f t J f i f t J s y fftrfin P s'- fit« (bSjP) /bdd Arnx SZ ' ItllAvb* tfs p s e n d ' JLjtPc Zft fHi I y f h r A f / ‘ U H ’ L H Mohrlen d vp d' f y M u t o - / c ' o - y f l L X i - H v f o f l J v S M f u s t C j H h v n d H Y C "^ p/vfrVfr* 1 0 f . A J a h f t *> - e t u A . - A b f p I o j f r U A h f i o n JLtiYMCAi vfjU'V. XidiiLpmj.. ..!IiKAltl MrtMTANA STATE UNlYERSir 3 6 ^r v Zv / % / / $ z" ^//Kf fT^/Y / R e / ry% / /f / / f / A f j o c t f ^ r r t d T CU. /jt/rift); ' j ; f ' /ff? ^ ( C < E r n X \\ X V / \ • . X'- ■ '--cLv Z/o 2 5 o Y T X \ — — V-— -A 1 i X r t H cA ;; A v i f f f J x / . I i f - f t T Y - / Y y ( A - Y f V ^ A(dp i A : :-« , / / pf ufiryf. . X v r Y 4 /, ' ;'. Sf- i t ' SA / f jh kif - 'f r -— • y * ^ r > uJ , d cJa.- r 'ct 1 * f ■' : «<. 2co /#> i t f ■jfj : - ' ' ' f ' f . ' . - ♦ Z 9A-&A + I* !Mt-Ii ' *■ ' r». .jf ItHf f<* * ->1 -f’ S - ZiVlV- -■ -hft-h .• A y / ' t C * A r i •’ v i '-- / / * * - T r \ ^ - X - - ! ^ - » V , • / - 4 k / # / f o r " X ■ • ? -.\ - X X i I i - Y Y \ « # * • * ' z # - ^ - T - \ I ZJu r / # !> Y . X i f- MP 4 ^ 5 ' t>Y I & S i ct) f . L * ^ / a a ' $ iY ^ " - /Z^ - ptbku 5. - ;." r>d>z/>- if 5 M - > ^ -- fV » /^ Y v / X f J V Y v . -Y Xff.I-AZA Cf ■ jSy VfrKSiti- i An/<. • z'c; 7< ri>/y 6fJY Ulfwht / Y///J . ,;•. - 7 Vi ' i l l US Y Affietk J , ' . zz A ) Xfvr 1 .- 4 V Y / f A f/ //u_ * ■!?? - V • i Z-MLi- 4«i#// Yv If- Z - Vt v- ■ • a Av. i t /zK y f fZ > / A l * f A f i S i l t r i ' i. ’J jh tii- Ke*; - I*. .1-Z : { v y / ■ / I t Q A - "— — -• X - >- 4/- ', " i- t ' i ,< i>y -Z fA -, .. ' A-^ nt H mh-rbli A c m Si iI ty. , Ao A ity p U p s Y f *Ur*z k % ( SfitA.p O Spcrj Ur- Kt f ,jf?4 /f t t V -/ Cfiiatf- , . / Y x/f tfvWjhtitilfS&hi u ic r j 1 »tv >?Y.. A Ar,j e*. Y - O I Y /« : / V 4 ■ :Y- • DBUMEM- M M ZA N A STATE U N IV H H ^ BOZEMAN ZL ^ k ::: V r r / / / - ' / 5 / / O z t /7 A c A / > f { /c o d / QffY, 0 - f tC >1 / J f iZnriZ £cntnr / \? l? £ n d /K V z U r X A ;- V z n iP / f / y * 1 X a s e e r : F = * ; s . IirEdp?:..! L ^ V r - ’ V1r-VXT. Z /o :' -. . '. -LZ-L f ? < X < ^ f M ^ L , /rt /&s*C-C * #t> > f P ^ i ., S Bz * /l&S J / Vi c& T / • C fit iI rU d k J > V , a+ 'iro l* t J ' ^ < ^ - zJ-ry; J c /Z s ^ ) 4n, I J k i t t y 4 * - / * t i / fKu 'L c&sii ■ y u f r I . ' ^ . ' Z/* )i4c- V fd - CV- dpuf/ &P*-1 f 7 > r a (fu Ji /(< j £ . l - h f , (s. H s ^ y /^ 5 . 1 4 ^ A O 1X-Zr AKTfttt1 CtVtSi d- St'-W-L Pt V t - W c ^ S t.trrtt'*+ S^nie f C^xitnJid f ji/ic-ire' JeYS^itcn ^ k ’ - ^yt/ 'iit YSt fry- fi:l /?) t t t t iw ft t *& Odyb• ■.(jP JatyukdPtJ Cd tt ^ I Si v > > M /»■< fijif-e*- M A ^ tM ^t U -*s>b- ._ ,SLjJ-LliJL-nt/ *. .._ . ip C h tty is. dj-rbL. Oc firi. Cfi si. ' rIPfi/ c / * v ; /o i l U k Pui , AisU-J Siik, SrrvPr = J P i f tjr V j V r /pisfdsr /V? ' A. ... - /U -J jU f* , >*>-<4 i J4J i ^ JffiAP& t-r£ , ' /LtJ- /do J P Jl t t t fCt Wfv-A *P* / ) ^OP- C y J j t t t t ( U ) y S-Vptru J_. /Y t/a. Z -An J -L k x Uytt • JtrPsiJ Ptcn iwinctdicn, -4 Vs ^ HtxCar VrcZX.- J SarHJ ^ J ti/rJ ttv / tS tt t fx x / • V sp- Pt-Plryy rc Zjt trs V y- f i ' 0 — p^Cppltttt it sbrvctt, r J J-CZfI ,M F Cd Jb-PPt* U-Jfi- f i (Cf (/JrCa 7 | / f i h r U J t t i V tc / tbrJdtfr* fi Jc'rJ Ir (asbtadttl ip/VfiryrltUaftJ d r - t— y b J j : f ' Lfi 4>U r P Y / f - W y liyj tjUlriPJS d p f ' Ctcfi >.s 4 ylfi I3 IiJc u A H k t t V?iy U>c * x J U c r f i f ih I t t [C) 7 CktJfX P /^ > ■— f ,n d u iU i: JkrruS nj t hr a rtt,oe AjnttUffV 5 ■=Z> ticc/uf&J H o — V L >'•-a . h;M M I rULS fi-t f Oj-C- Jme Latfir- p e U t t U r tH VYfipZTrf t i i ic iv U tt) U fi Zy ttc ttt th tt % - ■ Ssnt-C. /Z o -Z io O fd f/C fir r i < V i i f c h / ; L lfM Cfilrbn-fiXt L u i i L f ‘ ofi- bast G 5# Z^ f / Y X , /fatly Tnljlbnut- IlU Sfitfit fir} %-!<$ 5xhit ufitttst'L t J i t J Zrk-CSfiL. /00 $ P Y //m /t- tfhrbJdvQ / U T U k - u J c y t t r X r l t M f XVkiSkr P a J H i t t h t '' - d o ' T r 30 — A JyfiIYv Ut S o -ZO ' tt> V? S - i I # K t A -AhPaTzs t * v h . , H i i i t t j C/6bU - fisztt H H u i SC-HotLr /oztis 11-U i t t J rs r GsitClL- J b i - P - ZrxXLTxar) d E t J $ 4 * S= / 6 f F CTT ZP Cz ^ fj> l fc b l'- b Z firj I t ZyW" xpkd tf H f iJ t tJ / Zihi fH lC r Xrp./CS Vl S tfu ft iC i i t : cUs- Lxuvriit ttlHhrt X/ VK-M < A rkc**- J I rHr) dcnrf ffbtOSS CJUbJ Carh , h CKfifiikfcizs~ O r t Su r/. I Poskz - ssj CcJy s J O PfizJ C? t t J s i 6 Ilz MP 7 ' (X/bPfjttU JjJt;/LYi^ Itif1Kcnrfij O he fife.) L d d n J i Urzhctt I dr j, i Cfisbevdif /0 I - g s - # , o & S L r f i i t e f i f s s / V ZkJ 2 > v * bfiP.tt ttiuMfiz -UppfiP Uuzzijx q SeLdtt uopeV t t Dtclfii Jfcfc-P 'AmtP C/ M fttr OzH., CTBRART at3KIA.KA STATE UWtVTRCm BOZEMAN • I D fS ts h o t fh i i/s S f ' t iO n j.~ Ad- / f j Z / f ^ //'6 j T " 1 f i d t i t S b H M f t 6 6 C T T /Z g O / Z & ) fict/V fi -H did- / fU o i d - //ZO ! r /Zgo m ; /f foty*- /Ih$ 1 J J Y1 ^ , , /Z' foSittritr r ' & r y &eof,CcfyX X- //Z6 /m vA>y o^rit X ^ • b+'U/ ^ / M y * Z < K jiW K f jkz ---. -■; * •; # W - / o 6 0 i //P 6 A - k M i i i v wfL , t t h - i i d f * / [ z “ r ^ ' P ^ ' ^ ’t i s f i j m t 'kfcrrti** ) I 0 ty&>d \ V #) I H i i h U U t M H d - h j «fx !f % C.O- OfCA^ f rn,itIh, f Y is y r : #) j - • c % CS f^rJ Wu A' ' f f t f n f i . ytr>Ks^ n u r too J o rL y , ~h' ' irjt»u. A X ? fitc- tJncsifi • ; - - - - • . • , JTe //r-e /7 f 7 f ' ;’ rf J , tWJ ^ Mfrttiy (IrJ AHr'itf&fif 6 ? o v p f h k f i -biii. <*i_z j H n t J C ^ le . < r*i £>< a S u f i L I A/.,’A/y /At f* y' Du /io M * * n V o f - - 'ifi fit. t Sttd ^ tf3£ t < / m S * f d ( < f r A K v SeCficr)' D W y P if ; • OO turJ t j tn f i S h h - j ^ f ?Z AyicetSr ' prbfitt* JrsMibjdfi do *3 'SfeiiU- -fa rHtASur<. d f i ' f a f i t f - " fa****- fiet-r t>d etfofi y a f i t n M ' / t j j f i t fU f i bu t LiihfrApJtj ctttrsi Lft m i d r- c r e yX*- Jfintnj- f (tdrJthJnj'Hf Hifai faJn fv f '*v - j f i ' H t i trtfH fb ffa i t ^ O e ffJ fV i Wwr-«- W y /A j ) c / > r o io U k K r C T 4-- 4 - : -; EZ=L, ^ t v • jfo I > ■ _ W I #r > X r c n k r ld d j . l J E E C LtTnJytf , I) p i f i f k t 5fi fi JfknA Vfi ' UifafOfe J f i j a ih i - p t . z f i w - Vr ^ v b iy U J f- - j f e vSBtttfe A fn '- ( I j Q d n j Siirt fa fa fi in wi ■ e -fild i far lit JJfatfi : HLt fait fifi Cfp0^ f i T J f if t f i f fa f it . K.< r f W w - * a ‘ j t r j LttLys (O -h { j i t & f i f fo u C-MC. uJ id “> /( f id . fxuUt CPtte. f >/VbffCaJto * vj-+£ W lJ H J f * «3 w /. Of beO K . o n J J t J t f Jk S tir. I - L - W- - : > •j f Oi D OSH He s Cfcrd, fat J.coy-fj cfi ■ P,fiiA c Ivyes n tf •fa i Jit J ffa rc-P' v. n fao <9fr-< fa fifi f a n CnfJ u i f i fa fifa CfntiL' I fa fa h iy tM te f i CcdoSi Ij OS ^ 3 9 6 ' $ > . , ^ * 3 ' ^ fiffriG G d lU t tHJA J Ae r, / j k‘ d-'Lcte. JAH tU i CetfiYc J >k- C ifk fe i L j SLO JL-TTTl dY pe? W ^ J f i d A i f a f X r K J d t i l lK;d; J h f i /t J t v L s y n f i pie. o f i fS*.- Srvnc- CernC- f i p td L ltS fa d J , /LA OPtifych ^J 5<5G :•; ; i i ' Zfc^ '-- - / JpO ' - -i' , ZfO U O X f CHfbMrd- AicKt- W Ub Ji -r fa M i f'“—f C T T n c/^jf AcdLt-'ho I U tO n* h k i h Ce . /her-T ,W-bi-bxn iiAv j zdn o A m zi n e A-o C d h rQ t j-j Ac LjAT ' b i s o =WtcT-V 4 x C iit-C tfficS t- ip { S Jff faiAA kUn c' U M HliVfJt- SLpjMftfrQ > [y r. tse -fry jjff iv IhJ U Uf IfPMwrtS w y IfMutiQt eftuj. Oyndispirh fa Arfajfl efry^ ’faft'ric'na t fafCh OCtUf fafakjfri C f i i c y fa f t iC c y ' ScddcAp CenJrAtT '/ ■fiOhniCaf/p ((idrhd IAtfrrJCbrnfA -HfyY- < AllM JfteA AfChJ U tA t r jk J u > u * t f f J t r f f J ^ 0 T j f i c tfe >Xo5t, A Pi p t . M i V •x i o £ ; ■r - * . \ dm ZiiMdkJtfeclc I Hj /%%' fAt Id y k t-J/ptffi. YQnd bItve / • .y fat LdMj ■ f io H & y A * j f i t * * unde* jfiiiifa rj “*i1 dcwjtfa/fi Cdcuhj y Cf-) HfafK AATt-f j J t fc -Xrt . dgpQ /* @ # h ' T i .< v- -fife-Sk Carbxi n H Lrt-HcJtfMdc ( -Ij . •'MfkfUfhH'/ '(u J-j , Mfiii JaeJj f i r i if IKJo$uft h(n r j M ) b t t U f i ■f CfHptfI J cirfutfd : x i i3 w 4 C /M o ho 'lmMcfaSh r r :_3C? XXLTT f f f -V /Hootfhf ( c rt- Yc A Soht 4?fa" Syh-C H b r t Oi Ot* /5 t v * ) & *> # JtnsH. Cii tie r t-t pt yed Jt. jdcj t'U a rh W " P t f A T H A / r f ofa c- •hfirgis fiidkfif. rfcyfdi roon fa fa‘ Tfdfr rrSC fa W » . fi./ett n - CAfe ih r j ■ UxM C it fe jL- fien -CA fa. Q fk Sd me- A-j /c -J.P uwLV f e eicd$, ao/tf otx.ur ArhcfffPK YjffWfrfrbfs Settlt Cd r t f . fit LrI V S J A t f a t t Y i , - ^ iJiAhts mutfrObfaC7 L - S3Sar- fa OnnAdfld . . f A 6 . f / ? ( 6 iXfrhk fade rh d i CdfL- f f/J PjplHfUlLf rfiffikiY frAdOfi ! p I Li/ CfelC, Ce JeVtd -I — I — ■■ . ■ —V-- J § 1 ’ rV E ' / / C r i / c /> . / f f ? S E f " . C7- ! ’'7 ■----3 W A , 5 c J f J fJ t r C i h r t J & ip L f f Ui O lJ-U ff t 'iOYttrO f r t i t MI , , , f f l r-fustj LS '&0\S * Q SOh* J j Clr J h I r j C7 - I ZYC- ^ / 3 ' . ' C / 7 A /A’/ / A Z ttfh f f l i r t >-, . Sr/rd ! /'. ' '**&>/-( YitffaJk. / 9 r / .^u I ^ y 7 * 4 * 7 *, f * \ / * < 7 * 1 - /A-V p'O-ii’C / 4 / -fyut fc i CAvb Si A • I jf^ r- V ^ AVf? 5 ' :: , •fli Ay rcurJtf *idd-+S1 :"»,'■£/ < A d - i ' f . ,:: •> t# r' -'/'.c- AtN* / Cs- /•T . • i >n U • A , t / : ; - < # ' ’ / ' v / 7 p yA-'/f i<_ t, «?>*< s r " i 4 6 ^ $ - - *e** t>' ^ 3 * •# -- # ' / # •' y ' ' ' Z jk.&*q riCv (C H C r t x I t i i ' i CA*b J J r t t :'v HjTjtltJ ' ,-Ce.------- ‘N r, ^ 1 if A •— T : AC 1 5 ^ — - o -♦*» -——< > 1t tiSS I - - T f : ^ ' > , A? ' r; f«t/ CTTfij T fl*ic , >•/ '.‘ v' A r -Strbt , y f 1p At «<< ,CSrtti. /. L- PtiiLs . I t q i pn , i: . J 1 "/Ar Iru^artLnhdJk - ./' 6 tfi/A 'JS JsisirtC JtJ frt-Jr JfrfrfldiJjJ- A - - / 7^ n 6 *.. r. .v.- t * x* r:. - i y / ^ - / c / f A I r v j T' S ^ w l NT C- - ^ s . ' AC W . J f c - - Z y'9 ! ,cuicrJ //0. A/// y /YZy VC/ a f t /, ft CA S i ' f J i L i J i 5 / CS' WtlrtiU Cr. n i tens , --'-' - V ' i f f l / a t S -V X W / yy C ./ ifArJ i i h t f pj. Jr:. Uffali - C?; u(l UotJi - 1A zS t JJ SP- ftfff i fl JikkUr Iflf i-s t tM 'flnrtart- ji*S. Ao gf j/C sJflJbi; A/ f V-'- J.: / / - . - U n jI T f ■ IJ v 5 j' •-> r _ # . ; - L . J.. - 7« * . im X c n r . ? 'c i , J k j b n g j ' / A / d ' / & ■'" ' 'O r rV f- { ‘ A J tp e t t t f 'x K ■ « r'- l i ^<*4£a ' J ; W p ' f t i , , / i g f ' T f ' ! : f i .'■",> tvT- 5 c' r' X X v? ' 4ri/'(- ■ Tg-V 7.: ,T j: / '. f' I--VV- r-^ -eC. <5i-r 6. : jU ’y'-S- T'P / X - - & , ' / ; \ f ' r ^ / < / y . -At f ■ '■ d ; ^ ; > / / -' £ yi.f <7 ? >; ' • V' v . - W - :. 'fWUf. • I '-ySO:- -* i : -4t ' 'c ■- J ^ f a t /■: 5* i 6 ,w- < : / -Z-C <6 — / / . t <>/? /» 'Irfc <«,/ *r» " / 7 - / I--Arr.- >, : Jcs, !a;ETtf- -—- . . . — ufSi.; : l rp ••; ,a t C /> .jX< ' # iv .'-i. : ■- ' '. / X 2 ec- .-• - j /7^ < V- £■J., ' Z 5 ■M , s/. : ' ' ; 4v > ' . J ’ 0 •'---' i■ .-n TT r§ p .:y i-;.w?. /f^ % W jb . ' —• V I U cm pLcccc­g h "---T ... I T-V." -:- -T;r - ; . ' (<' ' -"' Vf f .' t / , 9 ' VT:V t . :S/ y/!)c •7 < ; v Sr' / " ' , / ' /65» VT- -ZK- .. :C. -T S;w :v V ---- TW--V-Tvz--V- / T ..-V ISr.-.-;-- I /fc 60 /I Ho M m j, »—j^ j V ; - -., '. . i - "" 'T ' I - I ' - -X^ - = -V ! Tri '- T 7• -' v -t -1; - - - 7 ■rxS,;- / £ C l 7 '/(W , / r, S T O . ^ .. I ''-'fT' - V 1 x * A . •— * —™ — -1 ■ T * « i 2 a E (U tf i H K toiA’ * r d " T ft. ,A - V - . (V#-' . - \ /> . Tl i r u - y ' V ‘ - ■1 ^ . .' ' V . f i " ^ . V t T ' T f -, 7 / ; $ : < X ' , TrTTTTr-1; Z ' I / / X ' ;■ j > V. NP -Z', ^ 7W / ' ' i s l iV. J //»<■ I .." 7 I . T T -4 , ' '• . ' • •?•*..:------ - ^_ ---- : ; 7 f , Z s ;.- i y , A fit t O ' d - /f, ; rd U k 'f, NfG ' - J p f £ ‘& 't '' V- : 7 - I? • S - •*—1 -*’ *?-7 4 f / vw- f - *Z j i- irS ,< Pif-H- H: -£■••/1 - f t*" V' * v : ■ f- / W -saRES—X v ! - : r ..-r-v- ZZ _2 —'*■- r Z V s- -7 ' v -v A t SN - / , / u - = , / V r * - =- - L A —. . - TTrr.... - , '- M /49 T- " '/ ---..'• -- XT uV- TTTrr ____ . -.i.......Vx V i **— :— -- — 4-- ; ' vj ;7 'Z / v Z ^ / f 7 Tff' tdSSti J »■ t , '1 . • '• f*;, % v-f tiWi-s*" ^ tojp/i-Vc^ -Vv' • ' '* ... ' iHeiiU iti-:', . xofav, ••': * ■ ■• JXy | O r a ^ ■" ?: -..-J.' . -. .,,t*no«« 9K ' .. ' :' < MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES 3 1 7 6 2 0 0 1 2 8 8 7 3 DATE DUE •* V J S . : "4; UAV B r 1Q99 M A V ? n » I'WM * ' ■- ■ HrIrTi— ? ./JiV ( 7 # IS © > 5 • " j y i i i 2 i m »on 7 I N M----- Arm *" *AAT% |• 111 S-I % V g A P P I 9 M f f i F E B l l R FEB I 2 2001 ' T R . J g R r r . ' T r r o n r '.Q l ', f i r r r k a L O A Hi l l I LlXy1 SEP I 42M2 I ’ f _ _ _ J _ Sh APR 11 am e r r t Z 3 s 7 E A o 9 7WW I . V W A F ^ 0 » HIGH SMITH REORDER #45-230 N378 B642 rop.2