Black, Laura J.2024-08-302024-08-302024-07Black, L.J. (2024), Reflecting on Zagonel's dichotomy of microworlds and boundary objects. Syst. Dyn. Rev. e1783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.17830883-7066https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/18795Aldo Zagonel's distinction between “microworld” and “boundary object” approaches to modeling suggests we ask ourselves pointed questions about what we are valuing, under what conditions, as we involve stakeholders with system dynamics representations. Reflecting on developments in both participatory modeling and large system simulations, I propose that Zagonel's dichotomous descriptions lie along a continuum, with room for scholars and practitioners to explore more explicitly the multiple ways we adapt system dynamics methods to the needs and capacities of the stakeholders with whom we are working at that time. Regardless of approach, whether simulation models or causal diagrams, modifiable in the moment or fixed by design, the goal of using system dynamics representations remains focused on fostering intelligent action among the stakeholders facing the problem of focus. © 2024 The Author(s). System Dynamics Review published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of System Dynamics Society.en-UScc-by-nc-ndhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Boundary objectsmicroworldsstakeholdersArticle10.1002/sdr.1783