Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWinters, Charlene A.
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Colleen F.
dc.contributor.authorKuntz, Sandra W.
dc.contributor.authorWeinert, Clarann
dc.contributor.authorHernandez, Tanis
dc.contributor.authorBlack, Brad
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T19:20:21Z
dc.date.available2017-02-02T19:20:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-08
dc.identifier.citationWinters, Charlene A, Colleen F Moore, Sandra W Kuntz, Clarann Weinert, Tanis Hernandez, and Brad Black. "Principal components analysis to identify influences on research communication and engagement during an environmental disaster." BMJ open 6, no. 8 (August 2016). DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012106.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/12533
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To discern community attitudes towards research engagement in Libby, Montana, the only Superfund site for which a public health emergency has been declared. STUDY DESIGN: Survey study of convenience samples of residents near the Libby, Montana Superfund site. PARTICIPANTS: Residents of the Libby, Montana area were recruited from a local retail establishment (N=120, survey 1) or a community event (N=127, survey 2). MEASURES: Two surveys were developed in consultation with a Community Advisory Panel. RESULTS: Principal components of survey 1 showed four dimensions of community members' attitudes towards research engagement: (1) researcher communication and contributions to the community, (2) identity and affiliation of the researchers requesting participation, (3) potential personal barriers, including data confidentiality, painful or invasive procedures and effects on health insurance and (4) research benefits for the community, oneself or family. The score on the first factor was positively related to desire to participate in research (r=0.31, p=0.01). Scores on factors 2 and 3 were higher for those with diagnosis of asbestos-related disease (ARD) in the family (Cohen's d=0.41, 0.57). Survey 2 also found more positive attitudes towards research when a family member had ARD (Cohen's d=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Principal components analysis shows different dimensions of attitudes towards research engagement. The different dimensions are related to community members' desire to be invited to participate in research, awareness of past research in the community and having been screened or diagnosed with a health condition related to the Superfund contaminant.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institutes of Health; National Institute of Nursing Research (R03NR011241)en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.titlePrincipal components analysis to identify influences on research communication and engagement during an environmental disasteren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.issue8en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleBMJ openen_US
mus.citation.volume6en_US
mus.identifier.categoryHealth & Medical Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.categorySocial Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012106en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Nursingen_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage5en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/