Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCorbin, A.
dc.contributor.authorPitts, Betsey
dc.contributor.authorParker, Albert E.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Philip S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-07T18:32:42Z
dc.date.available2017-02-07T18:32:42Z
dc.date.issued2011-05
dc.identifier.citationCorbin A, Pitts B, Parker A, Stewart PS, "Antimicrobial penetration and efficacy in an in vitro oral biofilm model," Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2011 55(7):3338–3344en_US
dc.identifier.issn0066-4804
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/12580
dc.description.abstractThe penetration and overall efficacy of six mouthrinse actives was evaluated by using an in vitro flow cell oral biofilm model. The technique involved preloading biofilm cells with a green fluorescent dye that leaked out as the cells were permeabilized by a treatment. The loss of green color, and of biomass, was observed by time-lapse microscopy during 60 min of treatment under continuous flow conditions. The six actives analyzed were ethanol, sodium lauryl sulfate, triclosan, chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX), cetylpyridinium chloride, and nisin. Each of these agents effected loss of green fluorescence throughout biofilm cell clusters, with faster action at the edge of a cell cluster and slower action in the cluster center. The time to reach half of the initial fluorescent intensity at the center of a cell cluster, which can be viewed as a combined penetration and biological action time, ranged from 0.6 to 19 min for the various agents. These times are much longer than the predicted penetration time based on diffusion alone, suggesting that anti-biofilm action was controlled more by the biological action time than by the penetration time of the active. None of the agents tested caused any removal of the biofilm. The extent of fluorescence loss after 1 h of exposure to an active ranged from 87 to 99.5%, with CHX being the most effective. The extent of fluorescence loss in vitro, but not penetration and action time, correlated well with the relative efficacy data from published clinical trials.en_US
dc.titleAntimicrobial penetration and efficacy in an in vitro oral biofilm modelen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage3338en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage3344en_US
mus.citation.issue7en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapyen_US
mus.citation.volume55en_US
mus.identifier.categoryChemical & Material Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.categoryHealth & Medical Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1128/aac.00206-11en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Education, Health & Human Developmenten_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemistry & Biochemistry.en_US
mus.relation.departmentHealth & Human Development.en_US
mus.relation.departmentMicrobiology & Immunology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record