Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFaulwetter, J. L.
dc.contributor.authorBurr, Mark D.
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, Alfred B.
dc.contributor.authorStewart, Frank M.
dc.contributor.authorCamper, Anne K.
dc.contributor.authorStein, Otto R.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-13T16:49:39Z
dc.date.available2017-02-13T16:49:39Z
dc.date.issued2011-11
dc.identifier.citationFaulwetter JL, Burr MD, Cunningham AB, Stewart FM, Camper AK, Stein OR, "Floating treatment wetlands for domestic wastewater treatment," Water Science & Technology 2011 64(10):2089–2095en_US
dc.identifier.issn0273-1223
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/12595
dc.description.abstractFloating islands are a form of treatment wetland characterized by a mat of synthetic matrix at the water surface into which macrophytes can be planted and through which water passes. We evaluated two matrix materials for treating domestic wastewater, recycled plastic and recycled carpet fibers, for chemical oxygen demand (COD) and nitrogen removal. These materials were compared to pea gravel or open water (control). Experiments were conducted in laboratory scale columns fed with synthetic wastewater containing COD, organic and inorganic nitrogen, and mineral salts. Columns were unplanted, naturally inoculated, and operated in batch mode with continuous recirculation and aeration. COD was efficiently removed in all systems examined (>90% removal). Ammonia was efficiently removed by nitrification. Removal of total dissolved N was ∼50% by day 28, by which time most remaining nitrogen was present as NO3-N. Complete removal of NO3-N by denitrification was accomplished by dosing columns with molasses. Microbial communities of interest were visualized with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) by targeting specific functional genes. Shifts in the denitrifying community were observed post-molasses addition, when nitrate levels decreased. The conditioning time for reliable nitrification was determined to be approximately three months. These results suggest that floating treatment wetlands are a viable alternative for domestic wastewater treatment.en_US
dc.titleFloating treatment wetlands for domestic wastewater treatmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage2089en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage2095en_US
mus.citation.issue10en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleWater Science & Technologyen_US
mus.citation.volume64en_US
mus.identifier.categoryChemical & Material Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.2166/wst.2011.576en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemistry & Biochemistry.en_US
mus.relation.departmentEcology.en_US
mus.relation.departmentEnvironmental Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.departmentMicrobiology & Immunology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage4en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record