Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBratton, Virginia K.
dc.contributor.authorStrittmatter, Connie
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-01T17:40:25Z
dc.date.available2017-03-01T17:40:25Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.citationBratton, Virginia K., and Connie Strittmatter. “To Cheat or Not to Cheat?: The Role of Personality in Academic and Business Ethics.” Ethics & Behavior 23, no. 6 (November 2013): 427–444. doi:10.1080/10508422.2013.811077.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-8422
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/12650
dc.description.abstractPast research (Lawson, 2004 ; Nonis & Swift, 2001) has revealed a correlation between academic and business ethics. Using a sample survey, this study extends this inquiry by examining the role of dispositional variables (neuroticism, extraversion, and conscientiousness) and academic honesty on business ethics perceptions. Results indicate that (1) neuroticism and conscientiousness were positively related to more ethical perceptions in a work context, and (2) academic honesty partially mediated the relationship between conscientiousness and business ethics. Implications to business practitioners and educators are discussed as well as directions for future research.en_US
dc.titleTo Cheat or Not to Cheat?: The Role of Personality in Academic and Business Ethicsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage427en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage444en_US
mus.citation.issue6en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleEthics & Behavioren_US
mus.citation.volume23en_US
mus.identifier.categoryBusiness, Economics & Managementen_US
mus.identifier.categorySocial Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1080/10508422.2013.811077en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Businessen_US
mus.relation.departmentBusiness.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record