Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhillock, Summer R.
dc.contributor.authorReiter, Lucca
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-01T20:09:20Z
dc.date.available2017-06-01T20:09:20Z
dc.date.issued2017-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/12856
dc.description.abstractIndividuals chose best options from complex information more often if they are distracted from consciously thinking about that information, and have an evaluation goal versus none (Bos et al., 2008). However, people heavily weight negative information, and are risk averse. Thus, this effect might exaggerate when people must choose a worst option, or disappear because the worst-framing serves as an implicit processing goal. Testing these possibilities, participants randomly received a goal to choose the best or worst roommate, then information regarding three potential roommates, the best (worst) associated with mostly positive (negative) traits and the third with balanced traits. Next, participants’ goal was satisfied or not via random assignment before they engaged in a distraction task, then reported their choices. Logistic regression revealed participants with a processing goal during the distraction (vs. not) chose the correct option significantly more often, but only when asked to choose the best roommate.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMontana State Univeristyen_US
dc.titleUnconscious Thought: Biased by Negative Framing?en_US
dc.typePresentationen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage1en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentPsychology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record