Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTomasino, S. F.
dc.contributor.authorPines, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorCottrill, M. P.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Martin A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-07T16:12:36Z
dc.date.available2017-07-07T16:12:36Z
dc.date.issued2008-07
dc.identifier.citationTomasino SF, Pines RM, Cottrill MP, Hamilton MA, "Determining the efficacy of liquid sporicides against spores of Bacillus subtilis on a hard nonporous surface using the quantitative three step method: Collaborative study," J AOAC International 2008; 91(4): 833-852en_US
dc.identifier.issn1060-3271
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/13194
dc.description.abstractA collaborative study was conducted to validate the quantitative Three Step Method (TSM), a method designed to measure the performance of liquid sporicides on a hard nonporous surface. Ten laboratories agreed to participate in the collaborative study; data from 8 of 10 participating laboratories were used in the final statistical analysis. The TSM uses 5 x 5 x 1 mm glass coupons (carriers) upon which spores have been inoculated and which are introduced into liquid sporicidal agent contained in a microcentrifuge tube. Following exposure to a test chemical and a neutralization agent, spores are removed from carriers in 3 fractions: passive removal (Fraction A), sonication (Fraction B), and gentle agitation (Fraction C). Liquid from each fraction is serially diluted and plated on a recovery medium for spore enumeration. Control counts are compared to the treated counts, and the level of efficacy is determined by calculating the log10 reduction (LR) of spores. The main statistical goals were to evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of the LR values, to estimate the components of variance for LR, and to assess method responsiveness. AOAC Method 966.04–Method II was used as a reference method. The scope of the validation was limited to testing liquid formulations against spores of Bacillus subtilis, a surrogate for virulent strains of B. anthracis, on a hard nonporous surface (glass). The test chemicals used in the study were sodium hypochlorite, a combination of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide, and glutaraldehyde. Each test chemical was evaluated at 3 levels of presumed efficacy: high, medium, and low. Three replications were required. The TSM was validated as it successfully met the statistical parameters for quantitative test methods. Satisfactory validation parameters, such as the repeatability standard deviation (Sr) and reproducibility standard deviation (SR), were obtained for control carrier counts and LR values. Both the TSM and the reference method were responsive to the efficacy levels of the test chemicals. For the 72 total TSM tests conducted, the mean (± standard error of the mean) log density of spores per control carrier was 6.86 (± 0.08); the Sr and SR were low at 0.15 and 0.27, respectively. Across the range of test chemicals, the Sr and SR estimates associated with LR were also acceptably low. The Sr ranged from 0.17 to 0.72 and the SR ranged from 0.34 to 1.43. Overall, the Sr and SR estimates associated with the efficacy data were within the ranges published for other quantitative methods and meet the performance characteristics necessary for validation. Collaborators: Alvey K; Buen M; Chan-Myers H; Chang G; Dell’Aringa B; Gonzales E; Hitchins V; Hollingsworth A; Jeske A; Kingma D; Kitchen nee Dormstetter K; Klein D; Lappalainen S; Lawrence J; Lehman L; Malulla K; Michler T; Paulson D; Regan P; Rodriguez A; Rottjakob D; Sathe M; Steinagel S; Suchmann D; Tester J; To T; Wieland D; Zhang Qen_US
dc.titleDetermining the efficacy of liquid sporicides against spores of Bacillus subtilis on a hard nonporous surface using the quantitative three step method: Collaborative studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage833en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage852en_US
mus.citation.issue4en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of AOAC Internationalen_US
mus.citation.volume91en_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.