Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNocker, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Ching-Ying
dc.contributor.authorCamper, Anne K.
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T22:19:49Z
dc.date.available2017-07-13T22:19:49Z
dc.date.issued2006-11
dc.identifier.citationNocker A, Cheung C-Y, Camper AK, "Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells," J Microbiol Meth, 2006 67(2):310-320en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-7012
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/13290
dc.description.abstractThe differentiation between live and dead bacterial cells presents an important challenge in many microbiological applications. Due to the persistence of DNA in the environment after cells have lost viability, DNA-based detection methods cannot differentiate whether positive signals originate from live or dead bacterial targets. We present here a novel chemical, propidium monoazide (PMA), that (like propidium iodide) is highly selective in penetrating only into ‘dead’ bacterial cells with compromised membrane integrity but not into live cells with intact cell membranes/cell walls. Upon intercalation in the DNA of dead cells, the photo-inducible azide group allows PMA to be covalently cross-linked by exposure to bright light. This process renders the DNA insoluble and results in its loss during subsequent genomic DNA extraction. Subjecting a bacterial population comprised of both live and dead cells to PMA treatment thus results in selective removal of DNA from dead cells. We provide evidence that this chemical can be applied to a wide range of species across the bacterial kingdom presenting a major advantage over ethidium monoazide (EMA). The general application of EMA is hampered by the fact that the chemical can also penetrate live cells of some bacterial species. Transport pumps actively export EMA out of metabolically active cells, but the remaining EMA level can lead to substantial loss of DNA. The higher charge of PMA might be the reason for the higher impermeability through intact cell membranes, thus avoiding DNA loss.en_US
dc.titleComparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cellsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage310en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage320en_US
mus.citation.issue2en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Microbiological Methodsen_US
mus.citation.volume67en_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mimet.2006.04.015en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage317en_US
mus.contributor.orcidNocker, Andreas|0000-0002-5343-9418en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.