Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBurr, Mark D.
dc.contributor.authorClark, Stewart James
dc.contributor.authorCamper, Anne K.
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-13T22:27:53Z
dc.date.available2017-07-13T22:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2006-04
dc.identifier.citationBurr MD, Clark SJ, Spear CR, Camper AK, "Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) can rapidly display the bacterial diversity contained in 16S rDNA clone libraries," Microb Ecol 2006 51(4):479-486en_US
dc.identifier.issn0095-3628
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/13296
dc.description.abstractTwo different strategies for molecular analysis of bacterial diversity, 16S rDNA cloning and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), were combined into a single protocol that took advantage of the best attributes of each: the ability of cloning to package DNA sequence information and the ability of DGGE to display a community profile. In this combined protocol, polymerase chain reaction products from environmental DNA were cloned, and then DGGE was used to screen the clone libraries. Both individual clones and pools of randomly selected clones were analyzed by DGGE, and these migration patterns were compared to the conventional DGGE profile produced directly from environmental DNA. For two simple bacterial communities (biofilm from a humics-fed laboratory reactor and planktonic bacteria filtered from an urban freshwater pond), pools of 35–50 clones produced DGGE profiles that contained most of the bands visible in the conventional DGGE profiles, indicating that the clone pools were adequate for identifying the dominant genotypes. However, DGGE profiles of two different pools of 50 clones from a lawn soil clone library were distinctly different from each other and from the conventional DGGE profile, indicating that this small number of clones poorly represented the bacterial diversity in soil. Individual clones with the same apparent DGGE mobility as prominent bands in the humics reactor community profiles were sequenced from the clone plasmid DNA rather than from bands excised from the gel. Because a longer fragment was cloned (∼1500 bp) than was actually analyzed in DGGE (∼350 bp), far more sequence information was available using this approach that could have been recovered from an excised gel band. This clone/DGGE protocol permitted rapid analysis of the microbial diversity in the two moderately complex systems, but was limited in its ability to represent the diversity in the soil microbial community. Nonetheless, clone/DGGE is a promising strategy for fractionating diverse microbial communities into manageable subsets consisting of small pools of clones.en_US
dc.titleDenaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) can rapidly display the bacterial diversity contained in 16S rDNA clone librariesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage479en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage486en_US
mus.citation.issue4en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleMicrobial Ecologyen_US
mus.citation.volume51en_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1007/s00248-006-9050-zen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage5en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.