Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLisle, John T.
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Martin A.
dc.contributor.authorWillse, Alan Ray
dc.contributor.authorMcFeters, Gordon A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-20T17:23:32Z
dc.date.available2017-07-20T17:23:32Z
dc.date.issued2004-09
dc.identifier.citationLisle JT, Hamilton MA, Willse AR, McFeters GA, "Comparison of fluorescence microscopy and solid-phase cytometry methods for counting bacteria in water," Appl Environ Microbiol, 2004 70(9):5343-5348en_US
dc.identifier.issn0099-2240
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/13371
dc.description.abstractTotal direct counts of bacterial abundance are central in assessing the biomass and bacteriological quality of water in ecological and industrial applications. Several factors have been identified that contribute to the variability in bacterial abundance counts when using fluorescent microscopy, the most significant of which is retaining an adequate number of cells per filter to ensure an acceptable level of statistical confidence in the resulting data. Previous studies that have assessed the components of total-direct-count methods that contribute to this variance have attempted to maintain a bacterial cell abundance value per filter of approximately 106 cells filter–1. In this study we have established the lower limit for the number of bacterial cells per filter at which the statistical reliability of the abundance estimate is no longer acceptable. Our results indicate that when the numbers of bacterial cells per filter were progressively reduced below 105, the microscopic methods increasingly overestimated the true bacterial abundance (range, 15.0 to 99.3%). The solid-phase cytometer only slightly overestimated the true bacterial abundances and was more consistent over the same range of bacterial abundances per filter (range, 8.9 to 12.5%). The solid-phase cytometer method for conducting total direct counts of bacteria was less biased and performed significantly better than any of the microscope methods. It was also found that microscopic count data from counting 5 fields on three separate filters were statistically equivalent to data from counting 20 fields on a single filter.en_US
dc.titleComparison of fluorescence microscopy and solid-phase cytometry methods for counting bacteria in wateren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage5343en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage5348en_US
mus.citation.issue9en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleApplied and Environmental Microbiologyen_US
mus.citation.volume10en_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1128/aem.70.9.5343-5348.2004en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical & Biological Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.departmentChemical Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.data.thumbpage3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.