Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorStoy, Paul C.
dc.contributor.authorTrowbridge, Amy M.
dc.contributor.authorBauerle, William L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T21:02:03Z
dc.date.available2018-10-22T21:02:03Z
dc.date.issued2014-02-14
dc.identifier.citationStoy, Paul, Amy M. Trowbridge, and William L. Bauerle. "Controls on seasonal patterns of maximum ecosystem carbon uptake and canopy-scale photosynthetic light response: contributions from both temperature and photoperiod." Photosynthesis Research 119, no. 1-2 (2014): 49-64.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0166-8595
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/14948
dc.description.abstractMost models of photosynthetic activity assume that temperature is the dominant control over physiological processes. Recent studies have found, however, that photoperiod is a better descriptor than temperature of the seasonal variability of photosynthetic physiology at the leaf scale. Incorporating photoperiodic control into global models consequently improves their representation of the seasonality and magnitude of atmospheric CO2 concentration. The role of photoperiod versus that of temperature in controlling the seasonal variability of photosynthetic function at the canopy scale remains unexplored. We quantified the seasonal variability of ecosystem-level light response curves using nearly 400 site years of eddy covariance data from over eighty Free Fair-Use sites in the FLUXNET database. Model parameters describing maximum canopy CO2uptake and the initial slope of the light response curve peaked after peak temperature in about 2/3 of site years examined, emphasizing the important role of temperature in controlling seasonal photosynthetic function. Akaike’s Information Criterion analyses indicated that photoperiod should be included in models of seasonal parameter variability in over 90 % of the site years investigated here, demonstrating that photoperiod also plays an important role in controlling seasonal photosynthetic function. We also performed a Granger causality analysis on both gross ecosystem productivity (GEP) and GEP normalized by photosynthetic photon flux density (GEP n ). While photoperiod Granger-caused GEP and GEP n in 99 and 92 % of all site years, respectively, air temperature Granger-caused GEP in a mere 32 % of site years but Granger-caused GEP n in 81 % of all site years. Results demonstrate that incorporating photoperiod may be a logical step toward improving models of ecosystem carbon uptake, but not at the expense of including enzyme kinetic-based temperature constraints on canopy-scale photosynthesis.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleControls on seasonal patterns of maximum ecosystem carbon uptake and canopy-scale photosynthetic light response: contributions from both temperature and photoperioden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage49en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage64en_US
mus.citation.issue1-2en_US
mus.citation.journaltitlePhotosynthesis researchen_US
mus.citation.volume119en_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1007/s11120-013-9799-0en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.