Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavis, Katherine J.
dc.contributor.authorBarnhart, Elliott P.
dc.contributor.authorFields, Matthew W.
dc.contributor.authorGerlach, Robin
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-05T22:04:35Z
dc.date.available2018-11-05T22:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Katherine J., Elliott P. Barnhart, Matthew W. Fields, and Robin Gerlach. “Biogenic Coal-to-Methane Conversion Efficiency Decreases after Repeated Organic Amendment.” Energy & Fuels 32, no. 3 (January 30, 2018): 2916–2925. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03426.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0887-0624
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/14992
dc.description.abstractAddition of organic amendments to coal-containing systems can increase the rate and extent of biogenic methane production for 60−80 days before production slows or stops. Understanding the effect of repeated amendment additions on the rate and extent of enhanced coal-dependent methane production is important if biological coal-to-methane conversion is to be enhanced on a commercial scale. Microalgal biomass was added at a concentration of 0.1 g/L to microcosms with and without coal on days 0, 76, and 117. Rates of methane production were enhanced after the initial amendment but coal-containing treatments produced successively decreasing amounts of methane with each amendment. During the first amendment period, 113% of carbon added as amendment was recovered as methane, whereas in the second and third amendment periods, 39% and 32% of carbon added as amendment was recovered as methane, respectively. Additionally, algae-amended coal treatments produced ∼38% more methane than unamended coal treatments and ∼180% more methane than amended coal-free treatments after one amendment. However, a second amendment addition resulted in only an ∼25% increase in methane production for coal versus noncoal treatments and a third amendment addition resulted in similar methane production in both coal and noncoal treatments. Successive amendment additions appeared to result in a shift from coal-to-methane conversion to amendment-to-methane conversion. The reported results indicate that a better understanding is needed of the potential impacts and efficiencies of repeated stimulation for enhanced coal-to-methane conversion.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleBiogenic coal-to-methane conversion efficiency decreases after repeated organic amendment stimulationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage2916en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage2925en_US
mus.citation.issue3en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleEnergy & Fuelsen_US
mus.citation.volume32en_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b03426en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCenter for Biofilm Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage8en_US
mus.contributor.orcidFields, Matthew W.|0000-0001-9053-1849en_US
mus.contributor.orcidDavis, Katherine J.|0000-0002-0562-7035en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.