Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Clemente Izurietaen
dc.contributor.authorReimanis, Derek Kristapsen
dc.contributor.otherClemente Izurieta was a co-author of the article, 'Evaluations of behavioral technical debt in design patterns: a multiple longitudinal case study' submitted to the journal 'IEEE transactions on software engineering' which is contained within this thesis.en
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-26T17:41:44Z
dc.date.available2020-02-26T17:41:44Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/15650en
dc.description.abstractSoftware quality assurance (QA) techniques seek to provide software developers and managers with the methods and tools necessary to monitor their software product to encourage fast, on-time, and bug-free releases for their clients. Ideally, QA methods and tools provide significant value and highly-specialized results to product stakeholders, while being fully incorporated into an organization's process and with actionable and easy-to-interpret outcomes. However, modern QA techniques fall short on these goals because they only feature structural analysis techniques, which do not fully illuminate all intricacies of a software product. Additionally, many modern QA methods are not capable of capturing domain-specific concerns, which suggests their results are not fulfilling their potential. To assist in the remediation of these issues, we have performed a comprehensive study to explore an unexplored phenomenon in the field of QA, namely model-based behavioral analysis. In this sense, behavioral analysis refers to the mechanisms that occur in a software product as the product is executing its code, at system run-time. We approach this problem from a model-based perspective because models are not tied to program-specific behaviors, so findings are more generalizable. Our procedure follows an intuitive process, involving first the identification of model-based behavioral issues, then the classification and categorization of these behavioral issues into a taxonomy, and finally the evaluation of them in terms of their effect on software quality. Our results include a taxonomy that captures and provides classifications for known model-based behavioral issues. We identified relationships between behavioral issues and existing structural issues to illustrate that the inclusion of behavioral analysis provides a new perspective into the inner mechanisms of software systems. We extended an existing state-of-the-art operational software quality measurement technique to incorporate these newfound behavioral issues. Finally, we used this quality extension to evaluate the effects of behavioral issues on system quality, and found that software quality has a strong inverse relationship with behavioral issues.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Engineeringen
dc.subject.lcshComputer softwareen
dc.subject.lcshQuality controlen
dc.subject.lcshEvaluationen
dc.titleThe identification, categorization, and evaluation of model-based behavioral decay in design patternsen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 by Derek Kristaps Reimanisen
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Upulee Kanewala; Mike Wittie; Christophe G. Lambert.en
thesis.degree.departmentGianforte School of Computing.en
thesis.degree.genreDissertationen
thesis.degree.namePhDen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage202en
mus.data.thumbpage19en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.