Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKrysl, L. J.
dc.contributor.authorGalyean, M. L.
dc.contributor.authorEstell, R. E.
dc.contributor.authorSowell, Bok F.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-13T22:39:03Z
dc.date.available2019-11-13T22:39:03Z
dc.date.issued1988-08-01
dc.identifier.citationKrysl, L. J., M. L. Galyean, R. E. Estell, and B. F. Sowell. “Estimating Digestibility and Faecal Output in Lambs Using Internal and External Markers.” The Journal of Agricultural Science 111, no. 01 (August 1988): 19-25. doi:10.1017/s0021859600082769en_US
dc.identifier.issn0021-8596
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/15744
dc.description.abstractTwenty fine-wool, ruminally cannulated lambs (average weight 45–9 kg) were used in a completely random design to evaluate the ability of three internal markers to predict dry matter digestibility and two external markers to estimate faecal output. Lambs were allotted randomly to one of four diets: 100% prairie hay (PH), 100% lucerne hay (LH), 50% prairie hay:50% sorghum grain (PS) and 50% lucerne hay: 50% sorghum grain (LS). The trial consisted of a 14-day adaptation period followed by a 7-day total faecal collection period. Feed and faecal samples were subjected to 96 h ruminal fluid and 48 h acid-pepsin digestions, followed by extraction with acid detergent (IVADF) or neutral detergent (IVNDF) solution. Dry matter digestibility (DMD) calculated from feed:faeces ratios of IVADF, IVNDF and acid detergent lignin (ADL) was compared with in vivoapparent digestibility. Ytterbium-labelled forage (YLF) and dysprosium-labelled faeces (DLF) were pulse-dosed via ruminal cannulae, and faecal Yb and Dy excretion curves were fitted to a one-compartment, agedependent model for estimation of faecal output, paniculate passage rate (PPR) and mean gastrointestinal retention time. In vivoDMD in lambs fed PH was greater (P <005) than DMD calculated from IVNDF, IVADF and ADL. In lambs fed LH and LS, in vivoDMD did not differ (P >005) from marker estimates. In vivoDMD for lambs fed PS did not differ from IVNDF or IVADF estimates but was greater than (P <005) the ADL estimate. No differences (P> 005) were observed in recovery among the three internal markers for any of the diets. Faecal output for lambs fed PH did not differ {P >005) from marker estimates but was overestimated by 15 to 20% by YLF and DLF. Faecal output for lambs fed LH was similar to the estimate from YLF, but less than (P <0–05) the estimate with DLF. For lambs fed PS, faecal output did not differ from marker estimates, but YLF and DLF values were 16% lower and 17% higher, respectively. No significant differences were observed in actual and estimated faecal output for lambs fed the LS diet. Estimates of PPR with DLF were numerically greater than YLF estimates for all diets except LS. Correspondingly, mean gastrointestinal retention time was less (P <005) for DLF compared with YLF for all diets except LS.en_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleEstimating Digestibility and Faecal Output in Lambs Using Internal and External Markers.en_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage19en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage25en_US
mus.citation.issue1en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Agricultural Scienceen_US
mus.citation.volume111en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1017/s0021859600082769en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record