Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarlisle, Tanner J.
dc.contributor.authorWyffels, Samuel A.
dc.contributor.authorStafford, Steve D.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Anna R.
dc.contributor.authorVan Emon, Megan L.
dc.contributor.authorDelCurto, Timothy
dc.identifier.citationCarlisle, Tanner J., Samuel A. Wyffels, Steve D. Stafford, Anna R. Taylor, Megan L. Van Emon, and Timothy DelCurto. “Evaluation of Sustained Release Mineral Boluses as a Long-Term Nutrient Delivery Method for Beef Cattle.” Animal Feed Science and Technology 279 (September 2021): 115028. doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115028.en_US
dc.description.abstractTwo studies were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of sustained release mineral boluses as an alternative nutrient delivery method for beef cattle. For both studies 16 ruminally-cannulated cows were used in a completely randomized design. In study 1, we evaluated degradation rates of two bolus prototypes and cow age (2-yr-old versus 3-yr-old cows) over an 87-d study period. In study 2, we evaluated two bolus types (90-d degradation target versus 180-d degradation target), as well as two diet qualities contrasting a low-quality high-fiber forage (> 600 g/kg neutral detergent fiber and < 80 g/kg crude protein, dry matter basis) and high-quality low-fiber forage (< 500 g/kg neutral detergent fiber and> 150 g/kg crude protein, dry matter basis). For both Study 1 & 2, intake and digestion periods were conducted to evaluate cow age (study 1) or diet quality (study 2) effects on intake and rumen/reticulum function. In study 1, models containing an asymptotic effect of day and an interaction between day and bolus type were the best supported of the candidate models for bolus degradation rate. Cow age did not affect (P= 0.48) bolus degradation rates ( = -0.81 ± 1.13) and degradation rates were greater (P < 0.01) for bolus prototype B compared to bolus A ( prototype B = -20.39 ± 1.13; prototype A = -9.64 ± 0.81). Bolus degradation rate displayed an asymptotic relationship (P < 0.01) to bolus surface area for prototype A ( = 5.83 ± 0.57) and a linear relationship (P < 0.01) for prototype B ( = 0.001 ± 0.0001). In study 2, models containing a linear effect of day and an interaction between day and diet were the best supported of the candidate models for the degradation rate of the 90-d and 180-d prototype. In addition, both bolus protoypes displayed a diet quality × time interaction (P < 0.01) for bolus degradation rate. Cattle treated with the 90-d bolus and fed a high-quality diet had a greater (P < 0.01) degradation rate ( High-quality = -2.64 ± 0.08; Low-quality = -1.97 ± 0.10) than the cows that were fed a low-quality diet. In contrast, cattle treated with the 180-d bolus had an inverse effect (P < 0.01), with bolus degradation rates greater ( Low-quality = -0.09 ± 0.007; High-quality = -0.04 ± 0.005) with cows on the low-quality diet versus the high-quality diet. Across both studies, two of four bolus prototypes met target release rates at 90 days. However, bolus prototype degradation characteristics varied and were influenced by diet quality.en_US
dc.rights© 2021 This final published version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license.en_US
dc.titleEvaluation of sustained release mineral boluses as a long-term nutrient delivery method for beef cattleen_US
mus.citation.journaltitleAnimal Feed Science and Technologyen_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.departmentResearch Centers.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupNorthwestern Ag Research Center.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2021 This final published version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2021 This final published version is made available under the CC-BY 4.0 license.

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.