Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLarson, Christian D.
dc.contributor.authorMenalled, Fabian D.
dc.contributor.authorLehnhoff, Erik A.
dc.contributor.authorSeipel, Tim
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-06T20:35:05Z
dc.date.available2022-09-06T20:35:05Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.identifier.citationLarson, C. D., F. D. Menalled, E. A. Lehnhoff, and T. Seipel. 2021. Plant community responses to integrating livestock into a reduced-till organic cropping system. Ecosphere 12(3):e03412. 10.1002/ecs2.3412en_US
dc.identifier.issn2150-8925
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/17077
dc.description.abstractThe problems with herbicide- and tillage-based weed management in agriculture are well doc-umented and have precipitated research intofinding alternatives. Integrating livestock grazing intoorganic agroecosystems has benefits and is a viable method for terminating cover crops, yet its impacts onweed communities are largely unknown. This lack of knowledge is particularly true in semi-arid environ-ments, including the Northern Great Plains, where we conducted our research. We compared weed com-munity responses (biomass, species richness, Simpson’s diversity, composition) of a sheep-grazed organiccropping system with those of two contrasting cropping systems (high input conventional no-till, tilledorganic) across afive-year crop rotation (safflower, sweet clover, winter wheat, lentils, winter wheat). Wefound that the conventional no-till and tilled organic systems suppressed weed biomass and reduced spe-cies richness and diversity, while the grazed organic resulted in higher weed biomass, species richness, anddiversity. During thefirst two years of the study, the composition of the two organic communities were dis-tinct from the conventional no-till communities but were indistinguishable from one another. Over thefinalthree years of the study, grazed organic communities were tightly grouped and became distinct from boththe tilled and conventional communities. We found that weed biomass and diversity were highest in thesweet clover and lowest in the winter wheat. The spring annual crops, safflower and lentil, demonstratedsimilar weed biomass, species richness, and composition. Ourfindings indicate that integrating livestockinto cropping systems alters plant communities and increases the agroecosystem plant biodiversity ofsemi-arid organic farming and that specific crops interact with cropping systems to alter agroecosystemplant communities. However, the increase in weed biomass associated with our grazing treatment makesthis approach impractical as the sole weed management strategy and necessitates that integrating livestockinto semi-arid organic cropping systems must be part of a larger integrated weed management program.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightscc-byen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectplant livestock croppingen_US
dc.titlePlant community responses to integrating livestock into a reduced‐till organic cropping systemen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage15en_US
mus.citation.issue3en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleEcosphereen_US
mus.citation.volume12en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1002/ecs2.3412en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage10en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.