Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcEvoy, Jamie
dc.contributor.authorBathke, Deborah J.
dc.contributor.authorBurkardt, Nina
dc.contributor.authorCravens, Amanda E.
dc.contributor.authorHaigh, Tonya
dc.contributor.authorHall, Kimberly R.
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Michael J.
dc.contributor.authorJedd, Theresa
dc.contributor.authorPoděbradská, Markéta
dc.contributor.authorWickham, Elliot
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T19:16:22Z
dc.date.available2022-09-14T19:16:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.citationMcEvoy, Jamie, Deborah J. Bathke, Nina Burkardt, Amanda E. Cravens, Tonya Haigh, Kimberly R. Hall, Michael J. Hayes, Theresa Jedd, Markéta Poděbradská, and Elliot Wickham. "Ecological drought: Accounting for the non-human impacts of water shortage in the upper Missouri headwaters basin, Montana, USA." Resources 7, no. 1 (2018): 14.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2079-9276
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/17154
dc.description.abstractWater laws and drought plans are used to prioritize and allocate scarce water resources. Both have historically been human-centric, failing to account for non-human water needs. In this paper, we examine the development of instream flow legislation and the evolution of drought planning to highlight the growing concern for the non-human impacts of water scarcity. Utilizing a new framework for ecological drought, we analyzed five watershed-scale drought plans in southwestern Montana, USA to understand if, and how, the ecological impacts of drought are currently being assessed. We found that while these plans do account for some ecological impacts, it is primarily through the narrow lens of impacts to fish as measured by water temperature and streamflow. The latter is typically based on the same ecological principles used to determine instream flow requirements. We also found that other resource plans in the same watersheds (e.g., Watershed Restoration Plans, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Watershed Assessments or United States Forest Service (USFS) Forest Plans) identify a broader range of ecological drought risks. Given limited resources and the potential for mutual benefits and synergies, we suggest greater integration between various planning processes could result in a more holistic consideration of water needs and uses across the landscape.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dc.rightscc-byen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectecological droughten_US
dc.subjectdrought planningen_US
dc.subjectprior appropriationen_US
dc.subjectinstream flowsen_US
dc.subjectupper missourien_US
dc.subjectheadwaters basinen_US
dc.titleEcological Drought: Accounting for the Non-Human Impacts of Water Shortage in the Upper Missouri Headwaters Basin, Montana, USAen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage16en_US
mus.citation.issue1en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleResourcesen_US
mus.citation.volume7en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.3390/resources7010014en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentEarth Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage6en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.