Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Derek A. Williamsen
dc.contributor.authorMacArthur, Kelly Annen
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-08T14:23:23Z
dc.date.available2023-02-08T14:23:23Z
dc.date.issued2022en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/17398en
dc.description.abstractCalculus sequences are frequently experienced as gatekeeper courses for STEM-intending students, particularly for students from groups that have been historically marginalized in mathematics including Latin*, Indigenous, LGBTQ+ and women. I report here on research findings that explored attitudes of Calculus 2 students broadly, as well as more specifically from the above-listed groups regarding what practices, pedagogies, and structures feel humanizing to them. I used a transformative mixed methods design, built on a sociopolitical framework, namely the rehumanizing framework outlined by Gutiérrez (2018) that includes eight dimensions. The goal of this research is to answer a call from Gutiérrez in elevating and understanding the perspectives of students who are often ill-served and thereby impact future undergraduate teaching in positive and humanizing ways. The quantitative analysis of survey questions (n=153) showed that students generally find example scenarios that align with the eight rehumanizing dimensions to be humanizing, based on their ratings of feeling supported in their learning, feeling valued and a sense of belonging, and having connections between their mathematics class and their lives outside the classroom. From qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews with 20 students who self-identified as Latin*, Native American, LGBTQ+ and/or women, a student-driven definition of humanizing emerged. For these focal students, humanizing centers relationality and welcoming/caring/failure-tolerant classroom environment. Teaching actions that focal students described as humanizing were summed up as connections-connections to peers, teachers and to their lives outside the classroom. Blending the quantitative and qualitative analysis shed light on differences between dominant (white, heterosexual, cis-men) and focal group perceptions, especially regarding the Cultures & Theirstories rehumanizing dimension scenario. This was accompanied by cautions from focal students about how implementation of some scenarios matters in meeting a humanizing goal.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Letters & Scienceen
dc.subjectScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Education)en
dc.subject.lcshCalculusen
dc.subject.lcshClassroom environmenten
dc.subject.lcshCollege students--Attitudesen
dc.subject.lcshMarginality, Socialen
dc.titleRehumanizing college mathematics: centering the voices of Latin*, indigenous, LGBTQ+ and women STEM majorsen
dc.typeDissertationen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2022 by Kelly Ann MacArthuren
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Jack D. Dockery; John J. Borkowski; Elizabeth Burroughs; Bryce Hughesen
thesis.degree.departmentMathematical Sciences.en
thesis.degree.genreDissertationen
thesis.degree.namePhDen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage281en
mus.data.thumbpage150en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.