Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeterson, Holly L.
dc.contributor.authorZanocco, Chad
dc.contributor.authorSmith-Walter, Aaron
dc.identifier.citationPeterson, Holly L., Chad Zanocco, and Aaron Smith-Walter. 2022. “Lost in Translation: Narrative Salience of Fear>Hope in Prevention of COVID-19”, in Narratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework, Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan (eds.), Montana State University Library, 116-137.
dc.descriptionNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework by Holly L. Peterson; Chad Zanocco; and Aaron Smith-Walter is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.en_US
dc.description.abstractUsing short, policy-image-like narratives, we explore the relationship between narrative agreement and narrative impacts in the case of COVID-19 in the US. Building upon previous research which identified attention narratives focusing on problems “stories of fear” and those focusing on solutions “stories of hope,” we use a narrative survey experiment of the general public (n=1000) to test the salience of problem and solution narratives and if they impact agreement with Center for Disease Control (CDC) prevention guidelines. Our findings are 1) fear story agreement is partisan but hope story agreement is not 2) fear story is the more salient of the two, 3) narrative agreement for both fear and hope were related to CDC safety guideline agreement, but were partisan, and 4) exposure to neither narrative impacted likelihood to agree with the guidelines as compared to a control group. Our findings are consistent with previous work indicating a Democratic party preference for stories of fear, where Democrats were more likely to support policy action. While we find that agreement with our narratives and guidelines is related, neither narrative treatment successfully altered support for CDC guidelines, suggesting a potential limit for the influence of narratives to either change or reorder existing preferences in highly salient and partisan issue areas like COVID-19 and suggesting a need for more research into the dynamics of narrative attention.en_US
dc.subjectCOVID-19 (Disease)en_US
dc.subjectPolitical aspectsen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subjectSocial aspectsen_US
dc.subjectfear--political aspectsen_US
dc.titleNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework. Chapter 5: Lost in Translation: Narrative Salience of Fear > Hope in Prevention of COVID-19en_US
dc.title.alternativeChapter 5: Lost in Translation: Narrative Salience of Fear > Hope in Prevention of COVID-19en_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentPolitical Science.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.citation.booktitleNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Frameworken_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.