Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWolters, Erika Allen
dc.contributor.authorJones, Michael D.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-13T22:03:06Z
dc.date.available2023-03-13T22:03:06Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationWolters, Erika Allen, Michael D. Jones, and Kathryn Duvall. “A Narrative Policy Framework Solution to Understanding Climate Change Framing Research” Chapter 9 in Narratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework. Edited by Michael D. Jones, Mark K. McBeth, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University Library. 222-242. doi.org/10.15788/npf9en_US
dc.identifier.other10.15788/npf
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/17763
dc.descriptionNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework by Erika Allen Wolters; Michael D. Jones; and Kathryn Duvall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe climate change framing literature is vast. So much so that researchers—whether seasoned framing scholars or those foraying into climate change framing research for the first time—can easily be overwhelmed by the sheer volume of studies, the vast array of concepts deployed, the variation in how these same concepts are operationalized, the nuance of a barely numerable assortment of contexts, and the effects all of the aforementioned have on interpreting findings. Here we offer a synthetic review of said literature, focusing on adaptation and mitigation framing studies and findings. In so doing, we first briefly distill the overall developmental arc of climate change framing research. We then provide a conventionally styled thematic overview of the mitigation and adaptation climate change studies. Among other conclusions, we find that while there has been a proliferation of climate change framing research, the findings and the studies themselves are often quite disparate from one another. Moreover, as the literature speaks to itself intermittently and in an ad hoc fashion, it is not readily apparent how climate change framing studies holistically fit together. As a solution to this problem, we offer the Narrative Policy Framework (NPF) as a narrative heuristic to help climate change researchers and communicators organize and understand the literature. We argue that an NPF integration of this inherently unwieldy literature increases the likelihood of research utilization and improves the ability of climate change communicators to inform people about the risks of climate change.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPressbooksen_US
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nden_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectclimatic changesen_US
dc.titleNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework. Chapter 9: A Narrative Policy Framework Solution to Understanding Climate Change Framing Researchen_US
dc.typeBook chapteren_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage21en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.15788/npf9en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentPolitical Science.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.citation.booktitleNarratives and the Policy Process: Applications of the Narrative Policy Frameworken_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

cc-by-nc-nd
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as cc-by-nc-nd

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.