Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Myles Watts.en
dc.contributor.authorShen, Zhihuaen
dc.description.abstractTransaction costs, information costs and defaults costs are suspected to partially explain differences in returns which were previously attributed to risk premiums in the financial markets. Two portfolios with identical costs are constructed from a Put, a Call, and underlying S&P 500 stocks, with the first Portfolio being hedged (Put-Call Parity) and the second Portfolio being unhedged (with systematic beta close to 2). The expected stock prices of S&P 500 were calculated based on 52-year historical data using several methods, and returns of the two portfolios were obtained and compared, using 935 observations of S&P 500 from January 2, 1992 through June 30, 1992. A linear regression model adjusted for cross-sectional heteroskedasticity and auto-correlation was used to estimate the expected risk premium rate. Transaction, information and default costs were statistically significant and estimated at 0.6% of value annually. These costs reduce the risk premium estimated by the Capital Asset Pricing Model.en
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Agricultureen
dc.subject.lcshPortfolio managementen
dc.subject.lcshCapital assets pricing modelen
dc.subject.lcshEconometric modelsen
dc.titleCost : a possible explanation for risk premium?en
dc.rights.holderCopyright 1995 by Zhihua Shenen
thesis.catalog.ckey33743en, Graduate Committee: Daniel Benjamin; Joseph Atwood; James Linen Economics & Economics.en
mus.relation.departmentAgricultural Economics & Economics.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.