Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Clayton B. Marlow.en
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Ronald A., Jr.en
dc.coverage.spatialMontanaen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T18:43:36Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T18:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2007en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/2450en
dc.description.abstractThe hypothesis of this study is that the use of prescribed fire to reduce trees and tree canopy, on a watershed scale, will decrease depth to riparian groundwater, increase riparian plant species diversity, and increase riparian biomass production. To test these hypotheses two watersheds, primarily managed for cattle grazing, located in Fergus (Dry Armells watershed) and Jefferson (Little Whitetail watershed) Counties, Montana, were chosen. Both watersheds were densely dominated with coniferous tree species. Average preburn tree density was 1,276 trees/ha and 350 trees/ha for both the Dry Armells and Little Whitetail sites respectively. Ten riparian drainages were selected for treatment and analysis within the two watersheds. Six of these drainages were burned and four were used as unburned comparisons. Prescribed fires took place in the spring of 2001 at Dry Armells and in the fall of 2005 and spring of 2006 at Little Whitetail. At Dry Armells 18 to 20% of the watershed area was burned. At the Little Whitetail site only 3 to 15% of the watershed area was burned.en
dc.description.abstractAt Dry Armells, average depth to riparian groundwater significantly decreased from 122 cm below grade to 79 cm below grade after one year, and monitoring continues to show an average annual decrease. Riparian groundwater at Little Whitetail has yet to respond. Plant species diversity did not significantly increase in the post burned riparian areas at either of the sites. Plant species diversity did increase, post burn, in the Dry Armells uplands. However, there was no increase in species diversity, post burn, in the Little Whitetail uplands. In the riparian areas (Dry Armells) that had the strongest response in groundwater, 14% more biomass was produced in 2005 as compared to their unburned counterparts. Benefits of this prescribed fire are enhanced riparian zone process and function, increased biodiversity, and possibly, restoration of perennial streamflow in systems that were previously ephemeral. Management implications based on these benefits could take the form of using fire to increase groundwater and stream discharge, or at the other extreme, using prescribed fire for total ecosystem rehabilitation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Agricultureen
dc.subject.lcshPrescribed burningen
dc.subject.lcshWatershedsen
dc.subject.lcshEcosystem managementen
dc.subject.lcshRiparian areasen
dc.subject.lcshSpecies diversityen
dc.titleThe effects of prescribed fire on riparian groundwateren
dc.typeThesisen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2007 by Ronald A. Tucker Jr.en
thesis.catalog.ckey1286595en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Joel Cahoon; Stuart Challenderen
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage61en
mus.relation.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.