Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Carl Wambolt.en
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Jennifer Kristyen
dc.description.abstractGreater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat was studied in central Montana primarily on Wyoming big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata wyomingensis) dominated rangeland. The primary objective was to compare shrub and herbaceous parameters within (use, random or non-use) and between seasonal habitats (nest, brood, winter). Nesting occurred in areas with greater total shrub cover (15v13%) and height (28v26 cm), and taller live (12v11 cm) and residual grass (9v8 cm) than randomly available. The shrubs under which hens nested were taller (50v44 cm) and more productive (61v51 g) than random shrubs. Due to increased precipitation in 2005, total herbaceous (18v13%), grass (15v12%), and forb cover (7v3%), and live grass height (13v10 cm) were greater in 2005 than 2004. Brood and paired random sites were similar for all parameters. There was greater shrub height (29v25 cm), total herbaceous cover (19v16%), forb cover (15v13%), and live grass height (17v11cm) in 2005 than 2004. Shrub density (1.5v1.1/m2) and residual grass height (9v5 cm) were greater in 2004.en
dc.description.abstractBoth winters were mild as no month had > 20 cm total snowfall. Shrub height was greater at winter non-use sites than use sites in 2005 (36v32 cm), but similar in 2004 (27v27 cm). Shrub height was different between years. Despite mild winters, shrub cover (12v10%) and density (1.2v0.8/m2) were greater at winter use sites than non-use sites although residual grass height (19v18 cm) and cover (13v14%) were similar. Winter use sites had less shrub cover than nest sites (12v15%). The nest and brood habitat and winter and brood habitat had similar shrub cover, density, and height. Herbaceous vegetation was more important during nesting and brood rearing than in winter. Some portions of grouse habitat may benefit from management for greater herbaceous cover, but never at the sake of less sagebrush. Sagebrush cover from 5 to 36% was the most consistent component of sage-grouse habitat. The differences between cover for nesting (15%), brood (14%), and winter (12%) were small. Therefore, any manipulation attempting to improve one seasonal habitat would impact the others.en
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Agricultureen
dc.subject.lcshSage grouseen
dc.subject.lcshHabitat (Ecology)en
dc.subject.lcshHabitat conservationen
dc.titleGreater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) habitat in central Montanaen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2006 by Jennifer Kristy Woodwarden
thesis.catalog.ckey1268200en, Graduate Committee: Bok Sowell; Michael Frisina; Jay Newellen & Range Sciences.en
mus.relation.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en_US

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.