Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Gretchen E. Mintonen
dc.contributor.authorBitz, Amanda Rose Echeverriaen
dc.description.abstractCurses are present in many of Shakespeare's texts, specifically his first tetralogy and tragic plays. In an effort to elucidate the various effects they have on the plays in which they occur, I apply J.L. Austin's speech act theory to curses, in conjunction with fostering a cultural understanding of the beliefs surrounding curses in the early modern period. The role of curses differs based on the genre of the play in which they are uttered, so this thesis is divided into a chapter on the histories, namely Shakespeare's first tetralogy, and a chapter containing analysis of three tragedies: Titus Andronicus, King Lear, and Timon of Athens.The efficacy of curses varies with their position against Austin's performative and constative speech acts, and they frequently embody characteristics of both. Curses in Shakespearean plays are nearly always feminized and function as a tool for vengeance by marginalized characters, which serve to represent and reinforce the beliefs of the time surrounding curses.en
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Letters & Scienceen
dc.subject.lcshShakespeare, William, 1564-1616. Criticism and interpretation.en
dc.subject.lcshBlessing and cursing.en
dc.titleThe nature of cursing : efficacy, femininity and revenge in Shakespeare's cursesen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2013 by Amanda Rose Echeverria Bitzen
thesis.catalog.ckey2133841en, Graduate Committee: David Agruss; Benjamin Leubneren

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.