Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWichman, David M.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chengci
dc.contributor.authorNeill, Karnes E.
dc.contributor.authorMcPhee, K.
dc.contributor.authorShort, R.W.
dc.contributor.authorVavrovsky, Joe
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-04T22:05:27Z
dc.date.available2014-04-04T22:05:27Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/3317
dc.description.abstractThis paper evaluates winter hardiness of fall seeded winter dry pea and lentil lines. A difference in spring stand (visual evaluation) amongst the winter pea lines was exhibited, with Granger Austrian winter pea having the best stand, but was significantly similar to five other lines (Table 3). Upon visual observations, large differences in winter survival among the winter lentil lines were observed (Table 4). Turkish-type (“T”) lines LC02600449T and LC03600295T had the poorest spring stands with an average score of 1.6 and 1.8 (out of possible of 5), respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCentral Agricultural Research Centeren_US
dc.subjectAgronomyen_US
dc.subjectPlant sciencesen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of Fall Seeded Winter Pea and Lentil Line Performance (Western Regional Winter Dry Pea and Lentil Evaluation Trials) (2008)en_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciences
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agriculture
mus.relation.departmentResearch Centers.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.