Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHulett, Sharon Ziegleren
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-09T18:56:15Z
dc.date.available2015-05-09T18:56:15Z
dc.date.issued1982en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/3723en
dc.description.abstractThis study was designed to investigate the effects of a computer drill and practice program and a computer simulation program on students' content acquisition and retention scores. The researcher's review, of the literature revealed disagreement as to the effectiveness of using a simulation approach for content acquisition. Very little information was found on the effectiveness of the drill and practice approach. Fourth grade students at Emerson Elementary School, Bozeman, Montana, were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups for instructional computing lessons in science-related material. The treatment groups were: 1.) drill and practice done individually (DP), 2.) simulation done individually (SI), and 3.) simulation done in a group of three (SG). Analysis of a pretest administered before treatment indicated that the treatment groups were equivalent. Treatment consisted of two ten-minute instructional computing sessions. A posttest was administered immediately following each student's second round of treatment. The retention test was administered two weeks after the posttest. Results of the data analysis indicated that students in all . three treatment groups showed significantly higher scores after treatment and retention. As there were no other apparent experiences with the subject matter at that time, it is reasonable to conclude that these gains were a result of the two ten-minute treatment sessions. Comparisons of gain scores between each treatment group were made to determine if any treatment was superior. A significant difference between the pretest to posttest gain scores of the DP and SI treatment groups was observed. This difference favored the SI treatment technique. No differences were observed on any other gain score comparisons between treatment groups'. The researcher concluded that all three instructional computing techniques were effective in promoting content acquisition and retention. The SI treatment appeared to be more effective than the DP treatment for promoting content acquisition. It is also evident that learning occurred even with the brief time on task allocated each of these instructional computing techniques.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Education, Health & Human Developmenten
dc.subject.lcshComputer-assisted instructionen
dc.subject.lcshScience--Study and teachingen
dc.subject.lcshEducation, Elementaryen
dc.titleThe effects of a computer drill and practice program and a computer simulation program on students' content acquisition and retention scoresen
dc.typeThesisen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 1982 by Sharon Ziegler Huletten
thesis.catalog.ckey47318en
thesis.degree.departmentEducation.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameM Eden
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage128en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.