Evaluation of nurse practitioners' assessment of patient reading literacy levels
Loading...
Date
2004
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Nursing
Abstract
Based on results of the National Adult Literacy Survey of 1992, it was possible one fourth of patients
who received health care from nurse practitioners may not have been able to understand instructions on
prescription bottles, or patients’ education materials, use written directions for tests, or give true
informed consent. Because of shame and fear, patients do not tend to self-report low literacy. This
study compared nurse practitioners’ utilization of indirect literacy assessment, that is, assessment
strictly based on clinic interaction, and direct literacy assessment, by a word recognition test.
The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Revised (REALM-R) was administered to 35
patients to screen for low literacy. Two nurse practitioners were asked “Do you think this patients reads
at or above the 6th grade level, or below the 6th grade level?” after clinical interaction with the
patients. Nurse practitioners accuracy, utilizing the indirect method of literacy assessment, the clinic
interaction, was accurate 83% of the time, (n=29). Based on direct assessment by REALM-R testing,
nurse practitioners inaccurately assessed patient reading literacy 17% (n=6) of the time. Of the patients
who were inaccurately assessed for literacy levels, 67% of the time the reading skill level was
overestimated, (n=4), and 33% of the time (n=2) the literacy level was underestimated. Chi-square
results indicated no significant relationship between nurse practitioners’ indirect assessment
methodology and REALM-R instrumentation.
Nurse practitioners correctly assessed patient reading literacy skill levels in approximately 8 of 10
patients based solely on clinical interaction. When inaccuracy occurred, the tendency was to
overestimate patients’ literacy ability; in the study, 12% of patients were unable to read six of eight
common medical words, indicating a reading skill level below the 6th grade. Written materials, such as
most prescriptions and package inserts, consent and registration forms, and many patient education
materials would be intelligible for those four patients placing them at greater risk for poor health
outcomes associated with poor literacy skills. Nurse practitioners could have utilized the REALM-R
word recognition tool to detect patient illiteracy not recognized during the clinical interaction.