Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLeCain, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-28T18:40:46Z
dc.date.available2015-09-28T18:40:46Z
dc.date.issued2015-04
dc.identifier.citationLeCain, Timothy James. “Against the Anthropocene. A Neo-Materialist Perspective.” International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity 3, no. 1 (April 23, 2015): 1. doi:10.18352/hcm.474.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-9910
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/9310
dc.description.abstractThe dawning realization that the planet may have entered a new geological epoch called the Anthropocene could prove transformative. However, over the course of its brief history, the Anthropocene concept has often been framed in ways that reinforce, rather than challenge, the conventional modernist belief in a clear dividing line between human culture and a largely passive natural world, sharply limiting the concept’s potential utility. Reflecting the overestimation of human agency and power inevitably implied by a term that is often popularly translated as the ‘Age of Humans’, some have already begun to argue that powerful humans can be trusted to create a so-called ‘Good Anthropocene’ through massive geo-engineering projects. No deeper re-examination of the human relationship to the planet is thus necessary or desired. By contrast, this article draws on emerging neo-materialist theory to suggest a radically different approach that emphasizes the ways in which humans and their cultures have been created by and with a powerful material environment. The technologies of the thermo-industrial revolution are framed not so much as evidence of human power, but as evidence that the material world has a much greater power to shape human minds, cultures, and technologies than has heretofore been recognized by most scholars. From a neo-materialist perspective, the new geological epoch might be better termed the Carbocene: an age of powerful carbon-based fuels that have helped to create ways of thinking and acting that humans now find exceedingly difficult to escape. Might a more humble and cautious view of a creative and potentially dangerous planet offer a more effective means of spurring progress in combating global climate change than the misleading anthropocentrism inherent in a term like the Anthropocene?en_US
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcodeen_US
dc.titleAgainst the Anthropocene. A Neo-Materialist Perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage28en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleInternational Journal for History, Culture and Modernityen_US
mus.identifier.categoryHumanities, Literature & Artsen_US
mus.identifier.categorySocial Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.18352/hcm.474en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentHistory, Philosophy & Religious Studies.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.