Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPerkins, Steve W.
dc.contributor.authorCuelho, Eli V.
dc.contributor.authorAkin, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Brian
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T17:52:13Z
dc.date.available2015-12-07T17:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-03
dc.identifier.citationPerkins, Steve, Eli Cuelho, Michelle Akin, and Brian Collins. "Use of Finite Difference Numerical Technique to Evaluate Deep Patch Embankment Repair with Geosynthetics." Transportation Research Record, no. 2473 (March 2015): 217-223. DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2473-25 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-1981
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/9399
dc.description.abstractLow-volume roads constructed in steep hillside terrain by cut and cast techniques may experience instability in the form of excessive subsidence that leads to large cracks and differential movement along the roadway bench. The technique of deep patch embankment repair with geosynthetics (DPERG) has been employed in the western United States; DPERG generally involves a 1- to 2-m-deep excavation that is backfilled with compacted granular soils and one or more layers of geosynthetic reinforcement. The design goal of a DPERG is not necessarily to eliminate future slope movement but to confine potential failure surfaces to a region of the slope well below the roadway bench and extending out to the slope face such that a failure surface does not extend up onto the roadway bench. This design results in movement along the roadway bench that is more uniform and less disruptive to traffic. This paper describes the results of a study to evaluate the DPERG technique by analytical methods supported by field observations for the purpose of determining the required depth of the DPERG and the optimum layer spacing of the reinforcement. The study showed that for a given slope geometry and set of soil properties that had led to failure in an unreinforced slope, there were several combinations of DPERG depth and number of reinforcement layers that satisfied the design goal. The study showed that more tightly spaced reinforcement layers were beneficial and that for widely spaced layers, the design goal of a DPERG could not be met, even for a thick DPERG depth.en_US
dc.titleUse of Finite Difference Numerical Technique to Evaluate Deep Patch Embankment Repair with Geosyntheticsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage217en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage223en_US
mus.citation.issue2473en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleTransportation Research Recorden_US
mus.identifier.categoryEngineering & Computer Scienceen_US
mus.identifier.categoryLife Sciences & Earth Sciencesen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.3141/2473-25en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.departmentCivil Engineering.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US
mus.data.thumbpage7en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


MSU uses DSpace software, copyright © 2002-2017  Duraspace. For library collections that are not accessible, we are committed to providing reasonable accommodations and timely access to users with disabilities. For assistance, please submit an accessibility request for library material.