Pupil response as a measure of preparatory control of attention in anticipation of deception

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Keith A. Hutchisonen
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, Evan Michaelen
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-10T13:48:51Z
dc.date.available2024-09-10T13:48:51Z
dc.date.issued2024en
dc.description.abstractDeception is generally considered to be more cognitively demanding than telling the truth, driving research interest in the relationship between deception and cognitive ability. Few studies have explored the preparatory attentional state occurring after the decision to be dishonest is made, but before the content of the question is known to the deceiver. Participants in the current study were given "Truth" or "Lie" prompts several seconds before being asked questions about autobiographical information that they answered according to the prompt. Cue-evoked pupillary responses, or the changes in participants' pupils during the fixation period between the prompt and question presentation, served as an objective physiological measure of this preparatory state of attention. To assess cognitive ability, several tasks assessing working memory capacity and attentional control were also administered to determine their relationship with pupil response. Aligned with results from a former study, it was hypothesized that pupil diameter would be greatest in anticipation of "Lie" trials, that working memory capacity and attentional control would be negatively correlated with the proportion of errors committed and positively correlated with pupil size in the final few seconds of the fixation interval, and that pupil diameter variability across the fixation interval would be positively correlated with the proportion of errors committed. Results showed a general pattern of constriction in pupil diameter in the fixation interval, which opposed results from previous studies, and did not provide support for the main hypotheses. Lie trials where participants committed an error displayed a significant decrease in pupil diameter across the fixation interval relative to accurate lie trials. Possible reasons for general pattern of pupil constriction are given, prompting a retesting of the hypotheses under better experimental conditions. It is still possible that there is a general pattern of pupil dilation in this preparatory period.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/18491
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Letters & Scienceen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2024 by Evan Michael Brennanen
dc.subject.lcshMovement, Psychology ofen
dc.subject.lcshEyeen
dc.subject.lcshDeceptionen
dc.subject.lcshShort-term memoryen
dc.titlePupil response as a measure of preparatory control of attention in anticipation of deceptionen
dc.typeThesisen
mus.data.thumbpage43en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Frank M. Marchak; Ian M. Handley; Michelle L. Meadeen
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage76en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
brennan-pupil-2024.pdf
Size:
604.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.