Prioritizing Imperiled Native Aquatic Species for Conservation Propagation

dc.contributor.authorWebb, Molly A.H.
dc.contributor.authorGuy, Christopher S.
dc.contributor.authorTreanor, Hilary B.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Krissy W.
dc.contributor.authorMellon, Cassie D.
dc.contributor.authorAbate, Paul
dc.contributor.authorCrockett, Harry J.
dc.contributor.authorHofmeier, Jordan
dc.contributor.authorPasbrig, Chelsey
dc.contributor.authorIsakson, Patrick
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-13T21:11:29Z
dc.date.available2024-08-13T21:11:29Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.description.abstractNative aquatic species are in decline, and hatcheries can play an important role in stemming these losses until larger ecological issues are addressed. However, as more federal and state agencies face budget uncertainty and the number of imperiled species increases, it is necessary to develop a tool to prioritize species for conservation propagation. Our objective was to create prioritized lists of aquatic species that may benefit from conservation propagation for five states in the United States. Biologists developed an influence diagram and provided information for multiple attributes affecting prevalence of species. The influence diagram and information for each species was used in a Bayesian belief network to generate a score to prioritize propagation of a species and the feasibility of propagation. When all taxa were ranked together within a state, mussels, amphibians, and a crustacean were included among fishes in the top species that may benefit from propagation. We recognize that propagation is one tool for conservation of imperiled species and that additional factors will need to be addressed to ensure species persistence. Nevertheless, we contend our quantitative approach provides a useful framework for prioritizing conservation propagation.
dc.identifier.citationWebb MAH, Guy CS, Treanor HB, Wilson KW, Mellon CD, Abate P, Crockett HJ, Hofmeier J, Pasbrig C, Isakson P. 2023. Prioritizing imperiled native aquatic species for conservation propagation. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 14(2):337–353; e1944-687X. https://doi.org/10.3996/JFWM-22-040
dc.identifier.doi10.3996/JFWM-22-040
dc.identifier.issn1944-687X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/18727
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisher1944-687X
dc.rightsCopyright U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2023
dc.rights.urihttps://www.fws.gov/disclaimer
dc.subjectconservation propagation
dc.subjectnative
dc.subjectimperiled
dc.subjectBayesian belief network
dc.titlePrioritizing Imperiled Native Aquatic Species for Conservation Propagation
dc.typeArticle
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1
mus.citation.extentlastpage17
mus.citation.issue2
mus.citation.journaltitleJournal of Fish and Wildlife Management
mus.citation.volume14
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Science
mus.relation.departmentEcology
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozeman

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
webb-imperiled-native-aquatic-species-2024.pdf
Size:
4.89 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.