Current Opinions on Forensic Accounting Education

dc.contributor.authorKramer, Bonita
dc.contributor.authorSeda, Michael
dc.contributor.authorBobashev, Georgiy
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T20:31:23Z
dc.date.available2018-10-22T20:31:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-01
dc.description.abstractPurpose This paper aims to determine current views of educators and practitioners regarding forensic accounting education, given the recent dramatic growth in the number of colleges and universities offering such education. Design/methodology/approach Survey, with statistical analysis of responses. Findings Results find that while both groups agree the demand for forensic accounting services will increase in the near future and that they prefer a separate course or degree be offered at the graduate and undergraduate levels, there are several significant differences between the educators’ and practitioners’ opinions on forensic accounting content and preferred teaching techniques. Practitioners consider topics outside traditional accounting as more important to include in forensic accounting education, and more highly value teaching techniques that add an experiential learning component. Practical implications Results can be useful to educators who have not considered offering forensic accounting courses or who wish to refine or update their existing forensic accounting education. Students seeking a career in forensic accounting can also use these results to facilitate their course choices to develop skills that employers value. Social implications These results find that practitioners value some nontraditional accounting skills, such as in forensic technology and interviewing, more highly than academics, which suggests accounting educators may need to develop interdisciplinary approaches to forensic accounting education. Originality/value As the number of institutions offering forensic accounting education has dramatically increased, current views of forensic accounting educators and practitioners are needed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKramer, Bonita, Michael Seda, and Georgiy Bobashev. "Current Opinions on Forensic Accounting Education." Accounting Research Journal 30, no. 3 (January 2016): 249-264. DOI:10.1108/ARJ-06-2015-0082 .en_US
dc.identifier.issn1030-9616
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/14943
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThis Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.titleCurrent Opinions on Forensic Accounting Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage249en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage264en_US
mus.citation.issue3en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleAccounting Research Journalen_US
mus.citation.volume30en_US
mus.data.thumbpage12en_US
mus.identifier.categoryBusiness, Economics & Managementen_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1108/ARJ-06-2015-0082en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Businessen_US
mus.relation.departmentBusiness.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kramer_ARJ_2018_A1b.pdf
Size:
313.39 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Current Opinions on Forensic Accounting Education (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.