Evaluating Native Bee Communities and Nutrition in Managed Grasslands

dc.contributor.authorStein, D. S.
dc.contributor.authorDebinski, Diane M.
dc.contributor.authorPleasants, John M.
dc.contributor.authorToth, Amy L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-17T15:23:07Z
dc.date.available2021-02-17T15:23:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractNative pollinators are important for providing vital services in agroecosystems; however, their numbers are declining globally. Bees are the most efficient and diverse members of the pollinator community; therefore, it is imperative that management strategies be implemented that positively affect bee community composition and health. Here, we test responses of the bee and flowering plant communities to land management treatments in the context of grasslands in the upper Midwestern United States, a critical area with respect to bee declines. Twelve sites were selected to examine floral resources and wild bee communities based on three different types of grasslands: tallgrass prairie remnants, ungrazed restorations, and grazed restorations. Total bee abundance was significantly higher in ungrazed restorations than remnants, but there were no significant differences among grasslands in community composition or Shannon diversity. Across the three grassland types we also examined mass and lipid stores as nutritional health indicators in three sweat bees (Halictidae), Augochlora pura, Agapostemon virescens, and Halictus ligatus. Although there were no differences in lipid content, total average bee mass was significantly higher in Ag. virescens collected from ungrazed restorations as compared to remnants. Floral abundance of native and non-native species combined was significantly higher in grazed restorations compared to remnants and ungrazed restorations. However, ungrazed restorations had higher abundance and richness of native flowering ramets. These data suggest that bee abundance and nutrition are driven by high abundance of native flowering plant species, rather than total flowering plants.en_US
dc.identifier.citationStein, D S, D M Debinski, J M Pleasants, and A L Toth. “Evaluating Native Bee Communities and Nutrition in Managed Grasslands.” Edited by Richard Redak. Environmental Entomology 49, no. 3 (June 2020): 717–725. doi:10.1093/ee/nvaa009.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0046-225X
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/16120
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rights© This published version is made available under the CC-BY-NC 4.0 licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_US
dc.titleEvaluating Native Bee Communities and Nutrition in Managed Grasslandsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage717en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage725en_US
mus.citation.issue3en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleEnvironmental Entomologyen_US
mus.citation.volume49en_US
mus.data.thumbpage6en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1093/ee/nvaa009en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Letters & Scienceen_US
mus.relation.departmentEcology.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
debinski-bee-communities-nutrition-grasslands.pdf
Size:
4.4 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Evaluating Native Bee Communities and Nutrition in Managed Grasslands (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.