Rehumanizing college mathematics: centering the voices of Latin*, indigenous, LGBTQ+ and women STEM majors
dc.contributor.advisor | Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Derek A. Williams | en |
dc.contributor.author | MacArthur, Kelly Ann | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-08T14:23:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-08T14:23:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en |
dc.description.abstract | Calculus sequences are frequently experienced as gatekeeper courses for STEM-intending students, particularly for students from groups that have been historically marginalized in mathematics including Latin*, Indigenous, LGBTQ+ and women. I report here on research findings that explored attitudes of Calculus 2 students broadly, as well as more specifically from the above-listed groups regarding what practices, pedagogies, and structures feel humanizing to them. I used a transformative mixed methods design, built on a sociopolitical framework, namely the rehumanizing framework outlined by Gutiérrez (2018) that includes eight dimensions. The goal of this research is to answer a call from Gutiérrez in elevating and understanding the perspectives of students who are often ill-served and thereby impact future undergraduate teaching in positive and humanizing ways. The quantitative analysis of survey questions (n=153) showed that students generally find example scenarios that align with the eight rehumanizing dimensions to be humanizing, based on their ratings of feeling supported in their learning, feeling valued and a sense of belonging, and having connections between their mathematics class and their lives outside the classroom. From qualitative analysis of follow-up interviews with 20 students who self-identified as Latin*, Native American, LGBTQ+ and/or women, a student-driven definition of humanizing emerged. For these focal students, humanizing centers relationality and welcoming/caring/failure-tolerant classroom environment. Teaching actions that focal students described as humanizing were summed up as connections-connections to peers, teachers and to their lives outside the classroom. Blending the quantitative and qualitative analysis shed light on differences between dominant (white, heterosexual, cis-men) and focal group perceptions, especially regarding the Cultures & Theirstories rehumanizing dimension scenario. This was accompanied by cautions from focal students about how implementation of some scenarios matters in meeting a humanizing goal. | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17398 | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Letters & Science | en |
dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2022 by Kelly Ann MacArthur | en |
dc.subject | Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (Education) | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Calculus | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Classroom environment | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | College students--Attitudes | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Marginality, Social | en |
dc.title | Rehumanizing college mathematics: centering the voices of Latin*, indigenous, LGBTQ+ and women STEM majors | en |
dc.type | Dissertation | en |
mus.data.thumbpage | 150 | en |
thesis.degree.committeemembers | Members, Graduate Committee: Jack D. Dockery; John J. Borkowski; Elizabeth Burroughs; Bryce Hughes | en |
thesis.degree.department | Mathematical Sciences. | en |
thesis.degree.genre | Dissertation | en |
thesis.degree.name | PhD | en |
thesis.format.extentfirstpage | 1 | en |
thesis.format.extentlastpage | 281 | en |