Tritrophic responses to signaling formulations sprayed in wheat stem sawfly-infested field plots

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Scott Powellen
dc.contributor.authorCaron, Christopher G.en
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-18T21:02:09Z
dc.date.issued2019en
dc.description.abstractThe wheat stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Norton) is an economically important pest of wheat in the Northern Great Plains of North America. Producers and researchers are continuing to search for an effective management strategy. A combination of management tactics, such as host-plant resistance and biocontrol, may be the best method to suppress wheat stem sawfly (WSS) populations. My study examines whether direct toxicity, induced host-plant resistance, or the manipulation of tritrophic interactions, can be achieved through the application of signaling molecules in WSS-infested plots. The overall objective was to assess whether signaling molecules could be incorporated as a management tactic for WSS. Field experiments assessed whether aqueous applications of methyl jasmonate (MeJA), methyl salicylate (MeSA), and Actigard? influence WSS fitness, host-plant fitness, or the recruitment of natural enemies. Treatments were applied in WSS-infested plots for 3 consecutive weeks in both 2017 and in a second experiment in 2018. Wheat samples were collected before harvest and processed to assess parameters of infestation and parasitism. Plant growth and yield parameters were also recorded. The field trials suggested that MeJA and Actigard? induced significant changes that can impact tritrophic interactions in winter wheat. No effect was observed from the applications of MeSA. WSS fitness parameters decreased with applications of MeJA. MeJA treated plots had decreased infestation (2017), decreased larval weight (2018), and increased neonate mortality (2018). Actigard? treated plots had decreased larval weight and increased recruitment of clerid beetles (Phyllobaenus dubius Wolcott) (2017). Treatments of MeJA decreased stem height and grain weight, while treatments of Actigard? decreased grain weight in 2017. Although many of these findings were not consistent for both growing seasons, this study demonstrates the potential for these signaling molecules to manipulate the interactions between the WSS, or its host plant, and associated natural enemies in winter wheat.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/18825
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Agricultureen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2019 by Christopher G. Caronen
dc.subject.lcshHost plantsen
dc.subject.lcshPests--Integrated controlen
dc.subject.lcshGrowth (Plants)en
dc.titleTritrophic responses to signaling formulations sprayed in wheat stem sawfly-infested field plotsen
dc.typeProfessional paperen
mus.data.thumbpage22en
thesis.degree.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en
thesis.degree.genreProfessional paperen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage57en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
caron-tritrophic-responses-2019.pdf
Size:
1.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.