Individual mineral supplement intake by ewes swath grazing or confinement fed pea-barley forage
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Janice G. P. Bowman. | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Ragen, Devon Lynn | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-06-25T18:43:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-06-25T18:43:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Sixty mature ewes (non-pregnant, non-lactating) were used in a completely randomized design to determine if feeding method of pea-barley forage (swath grazing or hay in confinement) had an effect on individual ewe mineral consumption and variation in supplement intake. Thirty ewes were randomly allocated to 3 confinement pens and 30 ewes were randomly allocated to 3 grazing plots. The study was conducted September 25 to October 15, 2010 and September 6 to 19, 2011. Targhee ewes (65.4 ± 5.84 kg BW) were used in 2010. Rambouillet ewes (61.9 ± 6.28 kg BW) were used in 2011. Ewes had ad libitum access to food, water, and a mineral supplement containing 11 to 12.5% salt with 2% titanium dioxide added as an external marker to estimate individual mineral intake. Forage intake was calculated using estimates of fecal output obtained by dosing gelatin capsules containing 2 g chromic oxide every day for 14 d, and in vitro 48-h DM indigestibility. Fecal grab samples were collected from each individual ewe for a period of 7 d and composited by ewe. Forage and mineral intakes were analyzed using individual ewe as the experimental unit. A year x treatment interaction (P < 0.01) existed for forage DMI and mineral DMI. Ewes in confinement consumed more forage than grazing ewes in 2010 (2.60 vs. 1.86 kg/d, respectively), but less than grazing ewes in 2011 (1.99 vs. 2.49 kg/d, respectively). Mean mineral intake was highest (P < 0.01) by grazing ewes in 2011 and 2010 (average 69 g/d), intermediate by ewes in confinement in 2010 (57 g/d), and lowest by ewes in confinement in 2011 (31 g/d). A year x treatment interaction (P = 0.05) existed for mineral DMI CV. Mineral DMI CV was higher (P = 0.04) for the confinement treatment than the grazing treatment in 2011 (67.2 vs. 33.7%), but similar for confinement and grazing treatments in 2010 (55.4 vs. 46.5%, respectively). In this study, both swath grazing ewes and ewes in confinement consumed more mineral than recommended by the mineral manufacturer and the NRC indicating that more research is needed to develop a better understanding of the factors that regulate and impact mineral intake. | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/2093 | en |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.publisher | Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Agriculture | en |
| dc.rights.holder | Copyright 2012 by Devon Lynn Ragen | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Ewes | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Grazing | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Animal nutrition | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Confinement farms | en |
| dc.title | Individual mineral supplement intake by ewes swath grazing or confinement fed pea-barley forage | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | en |
| mus.relation.department | Animal & Range Sciences | en_US |
| thesis.catalog.ckey | 1921362 | en |
| thesis.degree.committeemembers | Members, Graduate Committee: Patrick G. Hatfield; Rachel L. Endecott; Mark Petersen | en |
| thesis.degree.department | Animal & Range Sciences | en |
| thesis.degree.genre | Thesis | en |
| thesis.degree.name | MS | en |
| thesis.format.extentfirstpage | 1 | en |
| thesis.format.extentlastpage | 48 | en |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1