<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Colorectal cancer risk assessment in rural primary care: a quality improvement project

dc.contributor.advisorCo-chairs, Graduate Committee: Stacy Stellflug; Margaret Hammersla (co-chair)en
dc.contributor.authorGrubb, Danielle Lynnen
dc.contributor.otherThis is a manuscript style paper that includes co-authored chapters.en
dc.coverage.spatialUnited Statesen
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-25T13:27:35Z
dc.date.available2026-08-25T13:27:35Z
dc.date.issued2025en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in the United States. Early-onset CRC among individuals under 50 years is increasing, while screening rates remain below national targets. Rural populations experience additional disparities due to limited healthcare access, lower preventative care utilization, and reduced screening rates. Local Problem: At a rural primary care clinic in north central Montana, only 27% of eligible patients were current with colorectal cancer screenings (CRCS). A new electronic health record further limited providers' ability to identify patients due for screening. Methods: This quality improvement project utilized the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework to implement a structured colorectal cancer (CRC) risk assessment process based on American Cancer Society guidelines. Adult patients aged 21-75 presenting for annual wellness or establish-care visits during a six-week implementation period received a CRC risk assessment form at registration. Completed assessments were used to inform individualized screening recommendations. Project outcomes were evaluated using descriptive statistics. Results: All full-time staff (n=3, 100%) completed pre-implementation education. Of 33 eligible patients, 25 of the 33 (75.7%) completed the risk assessment form. Nine patients out of the 25 (36%) were identified as needing screening; screening orders were placed for three patients of those nine patients (33%). Conclusion: Implementing a structured CRC risk assessment in a rural primary care setting was feasible and improved the identification of patients needing screening. Integrating risk assessment into routine clinic workflow may support earlier identification of at-risk individuals and help address persistent colorectal cancer screening disparities in rural populations.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/19892en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Nursingen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2025 by Danielle Lynn Grubben
dc.subject.lcshIntestinesen
dc.subject.lcshCanceren
dc.subject.lcshPrimary care (Medicine)en
dc.subject.lcshMedical screeningen
dc.subject.lcshRural healthen
dc.titleColorectal cancer risk assessment in rural primary care: a quality improvement projecten
dc.typeDissertationen
mus.data.thumbpage54en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Anne Brownen
thesis.degree.departmentNursingen
thesis.degree.genreDissertationen
thesis.degree.nameDoctor of Nursing Practice (DNP)en
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage94en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
grubb-colorectal-cancer-2026.pdf
Size:
2.35 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: