Theses and Dissertations at Montana State University (MSU)

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/732

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Patch habitat contributions to biodiversity, ecosystem services, and crop production in the Northern Great Plains
    (Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Agriculture, 2023) Duff, Hannah Katherine; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Bruce D. Maxwell; This is a manuscript style paper that includes co-authored chapters.
    In response to global calls for sustainable food production and biodiversity conservation, we explored the potential of conserving small non-crop patch habitats, or ecological refugia, to meet food production and conservation objectives within agroecosystems. This dissertation considered multi-objective outcomes of conserving ecological refugia within dryland grain production systems in the Northern Great Plains (NGP) that included agronomic, ecological, and economic tradeoffs, and policy implications. First, we proposed the union of production oriented and ecologically oriented agriculture within a precision agroecology framework. We advocated for the merger of precision agriculture technology and agroecological principles to transform food systems. First, we explored the potential to incorporate biodiversity into crop fields using precision conservation to conserve low-yield areas as patch habitat and manage for sub-field variation. Second, we found that small ecological refugia increased plant and arthropod diversity, provided ecosystem service tradeoffs, and enhanced crop yield, but not crop quality in three dryland grain production systems in the NGP. Third, we found that local biodiversity response to landscape context was scale-dependent, and that correlations between landscape variables and local biodiversity were lowest at the most distant extent (< or = 5km from the ecological refuge). Partial R-squared values were highest when both local and landscape variables were included, and when composition and configuration variables were included in models predicting local biodiversity. These results suggested that local conservation efforts should be coordinated with landscape-level efforts to enhance biodiversity and ecosystem service provision across agricultural landscapes. Last, we found that removing low-yielding portions of crop fields from production could provide positive returns on investment to farmers but profitability depended on the size of the patch removed, harvest year, grain price received, potential yield gain associated with ecosystem services, and government conservation program incentives. Additional noneconomic policy levers may be needed to incentivize adoption of on-farm conservation practices. Looking forward, ecological refugia have the potential to host biodiversity, increase agroecosystem functioning, and benefit crop production. Future research should investigate site-specific practices for patch habitat conservation, determine effective incentives for on-farm conservation, and coordinate landscape-scale efforts to create and connect agroecological landscapes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The role of terpenoids and phenolics in controlling ecological impacts of hemlock wooly adelgid in the great smoky mountains national park
    (Montana State University, 2021) Branum, Emily Renaee; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Scott Powell
    The hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) is an invasive pest in the eastern United States where they have been colonizing and feeding on eastern hemlock oleoresin, initiating death and stand decline. Eastern hemlock stand reductions are important in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park because they host a notoriously biodiverse ecosystem, which is popular among tourists and economically supports the neighboring communities of Pigeon Forge and Gatlinburg, Tennessee. Rapid decline of eastern hemlock and their associated microclimates affect many abiotic and biotic aspects of the surrounding ecosystem. Although dependent on abiotic factors and metabolically costly to produce, terpenoids and phenolics have repellency potential in sufficient concentrations to prevent the loss of eastern hemlock and their associated ecological impacts. Therefore, I conducted a comprehensive, interpretive literature review to assess which terpenoids and phenolics are released after hemlock woolly adelgid herbivory, the extent to which they are produced, and if they lead to herbivory reductions. That knowledge is then related to ecological impacts caused by their release. Although not actually performed, I present sampling and analysis methods to achieve a representative terpenoid and phenolic profile followed by probable results, a discussion of current and potential management strategies, and subjects of future study. Overall, my paper is informative in nature and could provide insight and direction in the development of resistance-breeding, mitigation, and conservation programs. Regardless of which strategy is chosen, adequate monitoring, management, and restoration is needed to preserve eastern hemlock. Otherwise, the hemlock woolly adelgid population will continue to expand, negatively affect hemlocks, and degrade the Great Smoky Mountain National Park ecosystem.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Sierran mixed conifer forest wildfires: a biodiversity comparison between active and passive timber land management
    (Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Agriculture, 2019) Dalby, Caitlin M.; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: William Kleindl
    The mixed conifer forests of the Northern Sierras have great value in their biodiversity. Timber land management in this region varies by land owner and their objectives, including timber harvest and conservation. An increase in annual wildfires each year indicates a need to understand how different silvicultural strategies before and after fires affect the overall ecosystem biodiversity. Ecosystem functions and services can be affected by many factors involving anthropogenic activities in combination with fires. The aim of this study was to determine to what degree active (private timber company) and passive (United States Forest Service) management after a wildfire may affect plant biodiversity, and to compare those silvicultural approaches to active and passive pre-fire management. The study takes place within the vicinity of the 2012 Chips fire burn scar in Plumas County, California. Using tree canopy and plant species percent cover, in addition to presence and absence data, within frames and nested frames along 50 meter transects, statistical analyses revealed little significant difference between active and passive management. Analysis from data collected in this study concluded that tree canopy cover is significantly different under active post-fire management than under passive post-fire management and pre-fire conditions. There was not a significant difference in understory biodiversity (richness and evenness) among the four treatments. Dissimilarity in plant species composition was significant among the burned and unburned treatments, as well as between the two differently managed burned treatments. While the treatments were significantly dissimilar, there was not enough data collected to account for the high degree of variability seen in the data and so further data collection and analyses across multiple spatial and temporal scales would give better insight into the differences in biodiversity between treatments.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Integrating cover crop mixtures in the northern Great Plains: an ecological assessment on crop productivity, biodiversity, and temperature and moisture conditions
    (Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Agriculture, 2020) DuPre, Mary Ellyn; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Fabian D. Menalled and Tim F. Seipel
    Cropping systems can impact crop productivity and functioning of biodiversity in the Northern Great Plains, a region heavily reliant on low diversity crop rotations and off-farm inputs, and a region predicted to experience warmer and drier climate scenarios by mid-century. In three complementary studies, I compared the impacts of cover crop mixtures and termination methods on crop productivity and three forms of the associated biodiversity (weeds, soil fungi, and ground beetles), under varying temperature and soil moisture conditions. First, I assessed the impacts of the presence (cover crops and fallow) and composition (cover crop mixtures) of cover crops, termination methods (herbicide, cattle-grazing, and haying), as a function of temperature and soil moisture conditions on crop yields, and weed communities. A 5-species, early-spring mixture generated cooler temperatures, produced more biomass, and suppressed weed biomass under warmer and drier conditions, compared to summer fallow and the 7-species, mid-spring mixture. However, lower soil moisture and subsequent reduced grain yields following the mixtures, especially under warmer and drier conditions, suggests that continuously rotating wheat with mixtures may not be the optimal method to diversify small-grain cropping systems. Second, I assessed the impacts of the presence and composition of cover crops, termination methods and temperature and soil moisture conditions on fungal communities. The early-season cover crop mixture reduced plant pathogen abundance and enhanced AM fungal richness in both the soil and subsequent wheat root crop. The enhancement of beneficial fungi and fewer plant pathogens may be a proxy to better support ecosystem services through the use of cover crop mixtures. Third, I compared ground beetle communities among cover crops treatments and termination methods. Ground beetle activity density was not impacted by termination methods and was greatest in the early-season mixture at the beginning of the growing season and in summer fallow at the end of the growing season, while the mid-season mixture peaked in the middle. Ground beetle diversity peaked in the middle and differed in community composition earlier in the growing season. These results indicate that cover crop mixtures can act as an ecological filter to ground beetle communities to better support pest regulation. Overall, these studies indicate that cover crop mixtures can support crop productivity and the associated biodiversity with changes to temperature and soil moisture, although, with agronomic and ecological trade-offs.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Multi-species cover crops in the northern Great Plains : an ecological persepctive on biodiversity and soil health
    (Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Agriculture, 2016) Housman, Megan Leigh; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Catherine A. Zabinski; Susan M. Tallman, Clain A. Jones, Perry R. Miller and Catherine Zabinski were co-authors of the article, 'Soil water, soil nitrate, and residue quanity associated with cover crop mixtures in the northern Great Plains' submitted to the journal 'Agriculture, ecosystems, and environment' which is contained within this thesis.; Susan M. Tallman, Clain A. Jones, Perry R. Miller and Catherine Zabinski were co-authors of the article, 'Multi-species cover crops: effects on soil biology after one and two rotations in the semi-arid northern Great Plains' submitted to the journal 'Soil biology and biochemistry' which is contained within this thesis.
    As summer fallow is replaced by cover crops, we aim to address how cover crops influence soil properties. Past studies conducted across the Northern Great Plains have investigated the short- and long- term effects of LGMs on water, nitrate, and carbon storage, soil parameters including potentially mineralizable nitrogen (PMN) and enzymatic activity, and wheat yield. Less knowledge exists regarding similar short- and especially long-term effects of CCMs in the NGP. This four-year study replicated at four sites in Montana allows us to investigate how site characteristics and annual weather patterns can influence the performance of cover crop growth and the subsequent effect on soil quality. Our research approach to building cover crop mixtures using functional group composition rather than species composition aims to make the work more broadly applicable to other regions. Other regions may utilize more adapted legume or brassica species and could still use our results to estimate their effects on soil and nitrate use throughout the soil profile or their effects on soil biological parameters.
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.