Scholarship & Research
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/1
Browse
3 results
Search Results
Item Towards a Low-Cost Comprehensive Process for On-Farm Precision Experimentation and Analysis(MDPI, 2023-02) Hegedus, Paul B.; Maxwell, Bruce; Sheppard, John; Loewen, Sasha; Duff, Hannah; Morales-Luna, Giorgio; Peerlinck, AmyFew mechanisms turn field-specific ecological data into management recommendations for crop production with appropriate uncertainty. Precision agriculture is mainly deployed for machine efficiencies and soil-based zonal management, and the traditional paradigm of small plot research fails to unite agronomic research and effective management under farmers’ unique field constraints. This work assesses the use of on-farm experiments applied with precision agriculture technologies and open-source data to gain local knowledge of the spatiotemporal variability in agroeconomic performance on the subfield scale to accelerate learning and overcome the bias inherent in traditional research approaches. The on-farm precision experimentation methodology is an approach to improve farmers’ abilities to make site-specific agronomic input decisions by simulating a distribution of economic outcomes for the producer using field-specific crop response models that account for spatiotemporal uncertainty in crop responses. The methodology is the basis of a decision support system that includes a six-step cyclical process that engages precision agriculture technology to apply experiments, gather field-specific data, incorporate modern data management and analytical approaches, and generate management recommendations as probabilities of outcomes. The quantification of variability in crop response to inputs and drawing on historic knowledge about the field and economic constraints up to the time a decision is required allows for probabilistic inference that a future management scenario will outcompete another in terms of production, economics, and sustainability. The proposed methodology represents advancement over other approaches by comparing management strategies and providing the probability that each will increase producer profits over their previous input management on the field scale.Item Hyperspectral imaging and machine learning for monitoring produce ripeness(2020-04) Logan, Riley D.; Scherrer, Bryan; Senecal, Jacob; Walton, Neil S.; Peerlinck, Amy; Sheppard, John W.; Shaw, Joseph A.Hyperspectral imaging is a powerful remote sensing tool capable of capturing rich spectral and spatial information. Although the origins of hyperspectral imaging are in terrestrial remote sensing, new applications are emerging rapidly. Owing to its non-destructive nature, hyperspectral imaging has become a useful tool for monitoring produce ripeness. This paper describes the process that uses a visible near-infrared (VNIR) hyperspectral imager from Resonon, Inc., coupled with machine learning algorithms to assess the ripeness of various pieces of produce. The images were converted to reflectance across a spectral range of 387.12 nm to 1023.5 nm, with a spectral resolution of 2.12 nm. A convolutional neural network was used to perform age classification for potatoes, bananas, and green peppers. Additionally, a genetic algorithm was used to determine the wavelengths carrying the most useful information for age classification. Experiments were run using RGB images, full spectrum hyperspectral images, and the genetic algorithm feature selection method. Results showed that the genetic algorithm-based feature selection method outperforms RGB images for all tested produce, outperforms hyperspectral imagery for bananas, and matches hyperspectral imagery performance for green peppers. This feature selection method is being used to develop a low-cost multi-spectral imager for use in monitoring produce in grocery stores.Item Improving a precision agriculture on-farm experimentation workflow through machine learning(Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Engineering, 2019) Peerlinck, Amy; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: John SheppardReducing environmental impact while simultaneously improving net return of crops is one of the key goals of Precision Agriculture (PA). To this end, an on-farm experimentation workflow was created that focuses on reducing the applied nitrogen (N) rate through variable rate application (VRA). The first step in the process, after gathering initial data from the farmers, creates experimental randomly stratified N prescription maps. One of the main concerns that arises for farmers within these maps is the large jumps in N rate between consecutive cells. To this end we successfully develop and apply a Genetic Algorithm to minimize rate jumps while maintaining stratification across yield and protein bins. The ultimate goal of the on-farm experiments is to determine the final N rate to be applied. This is accomplished by optimizing a net return function based on yield and protein prediction. Currently, these predictions are often done with simple linear and non-linear regression models. Our work introduces six different machine learning (ML) models for improving this task: a single layer feed-forward neural network (FFNN), a stacked auto-encoder (SAE), three different AdaBoost ensembles, and a bagging ensemble. The AdaBoost and bagging methods each use a single layer FFNN as its weak model. Furthermore, a simple spatial analysis is performed to create spatial data sets, to better represent the inherent spatial nature of the field data. These methods are applied to four actual fields' yield and protein data. The spatial data is shown to improve accuracy for most yield models. It does not perform as well on the protein data, possibly due to the small size of these data sets, resulting in a sparse data set and potential overfitting of the models. When comparing the predictive models, the deep network performed better than the shallow network, and the ensemble methods outperformed both the SAE and a single FFNN. Out of the four different ensemble methods, bagging had the most consistent performance across the yield and protein data sets. Overall, spatial bagging using FFNNs as the weak learner has the best performance for both yield and protein prediction.