Improvement of cervical cancer screening in a rural primary care setting: a quality improvement project

Thumbnail Image

Date

2024

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Nursing

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most diagnosed cancer among women. Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is a vital component of routine health care, as any individual with a cervix is at risk of developing cervical cancer, and nearly all diagnoses of aggressive cervical cancer are directly associated with a lack of screening, underscreening or inadequate follow-up of abnormal results. Unfortunately, the number of women overdue for CCS continues to increase gradually nationally and in Montana. Local Problem: At a rural primary healthcare clinic in northwestern Montana, 37.0% of patients have a current CCS completion documented, compared to Healthy People's 2030 benchmark of 84.3%. Methods: Participants included female patients ages 21-65 who presented to the clinical for an annual exam. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, the intervention outcomes were measured biweekly throughout the six-week initiative. Measures assessed included: Adequate CCS eligibility determination, proper CCS documentation with the EHR, and the overall site CCS completion percentage. Data was collected over six weeks, de-identified, and analyzed using percentages and bar graphs. Interventions: Literature supported a multifactorial approach to standardize workflows and documentation practices among the nurses and medical assistants (MA) through the provision of educational material and a CCS clinical decision tree. Key process changes included offering of same-day CCS screening, follow-up scheduling prior to the patient leaving, and EHR alert creation if patient records were requested. Results: A total of 30 patients presented to the clinic. 100% of patients who presented to the clinic were assessed for CCS eligibility. 100% of eligible patients were offered CCS. 84.6% of patients had correct CCS documentation by the staff within the EHR, with four patients lacking proper documentation. A 4.1% increase was seen in the overall facility CCS completion percentage, reaching a total CCS completion percentage of 41.1%. Conclusions: Implementing education, standardized workflows, and the use of the CCS clinical decision tree improved CCS documentation and completion rates.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.