A meta-analytic review of the performance-cue bias

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Richard F. Martellen
dc.contributor.authorMoody, Ann Michelleen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T18:37:50Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T18:37:50Z
dc.date.issued2005en
dc.description.abstractThis review is a quantitative synthesis of the Performance-Cue Bias literature (43 effect sizes, from 43 independent samples, and 4,013 participants). The purpose of this synthesis was to test the overall magnitude of the Performance-Cue bias as well as 9 possible moderators of this phenomenon. Across all moderators, raters who were given positive performance cues rated the target more favorably than raters given negative performance cues. Five potential moderators were identified and shown to significantly influence the Performance-Cue Bias. These significant moderators were; timing of the performance information, target of the rating, type of rating instrument, type of behavior that was being rated, as well as whether participants were part of a training intervention. I discuss the practical ramifications for the identification of these moderators as well as the moderators that were hypothesized to have an impact but did not.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/1896en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Letters & Scienceen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2005 by Ann Michelle Moodyen
dc.subject.lcshMeta-analysisen
dc.titleA meta-analytic review of the performance-cue biasen
dc.typeThesisen
thesis.catalog.ckey1168323en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Jennifer Boldry; Michael Babcocken
thesis.degree.departmentPsychology.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage33en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MoodyA0505.pdf
Size:
327.71 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.