Animal Vehicle Collision Reduction and Habitat Connectivity Pooled Fund Study – Literature Review

dc.contributor.authorHuijser, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorAment, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorBell, M.
dc.contributor.authorClevenger, A. P.
dc.contributor.authorFairbank, E.R.
dc.contributor.authorGunson, K.E.
dc.contributor.authorMcGuire, T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T22:32:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-21T22:32:13Z
dc.date.issued2021-12
dc.description.abstractThis report contains a summary of past research and new knowledge about the effectiveness of mitigation measures aimed at reducing animal-vehicle collisions and at providing safe crossing opportunities for wildlife. The measures are aimed at terrestrial large bodied wild mammal species, free roaming large livestock species (e.g. cattle, horses), free roaming large feral species (e.g. “wild” horses and burros), and small animal species (amphibians, reptiles, and small mammals). While mitigation is common, it is best to follow a three-step approach: avoidance, mitigation, and compensation or “off-site” mitigation. If reducing collisions with large wild mammals is the only objective, the most effective measures include roadside animal detection systems, wildlife culling, wildlife relocation, anti-fertility treatments, wildlife barriers (fences),and wildlife fences in combination with wildlife crossing structures. If the objectives also include maintaining or improving connectivity for large wild mammals, then wildlife barriers (fences) in combination with wildlife crossing structures are most effective. Measures for large domestic mammal species are largely similar, though for free roaming livestock there are legal, moral and ethical issues. For small animal species, temporary or permanent road closure and road removal are sometimes implemented, but barriers in combination with crossing structures are the most common.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNevada Department of Transportationen_US
dc.identifier.citationHuijser MP, Ament RJ, Bell M, Clevenger AP, Fairbank ER, Gunson KE, Mcguire T, editors. Final Report 2022: Animal vehicle collision reduction and habitat connectivity pooled fund study – Literature review. Transportation Pooled Fund Study, TPF-5(358). Nevada Department of Transportation, Carson City, NV.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17312
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNevada Department of Transportationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofhttp://tpf-5-358-wvc-study.orgen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesNDOT Research Report;701-18-803 TO 1 – Literature Review
dc.subjectAmphibians, Animals, Barriers, Carcasses, Cattle, Collisions, Connectivity, Crashes, Crossings, Donkeys, Ecology, Fences, Feral, Habitat, Horses, Infrastructure, Literature, Livestock, Mammals, Measures, Mitigation, Mortality, Reptiles, Review, Safety, Structures, Traffic,Transportation, Vehicle, Wildlifeen_US
dc.titleAnimal Vehicle Collision Reduction and Habitat Connectivity Pooled Fund Study – Literature Reviewen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage134en_US
mus.citation.technicalreportnumber701-18-803 TO 1 – Literature Reviewen_US
mus.data.thumbpage1en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.15788/ndot2021.12
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Engineeringen_US
mus.relation.researchgroupWestern Transportation Institute (WTI).en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Report_TPF-5-358_AVC_Reduction_Connectivity_Solutions_Literature_Review-V2.pdf
Size:
3.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Final Report 2022: Animal vehicle collision reduction and habitat connectivity pooled fund study – Literature review (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.