A comparison of training methods for enhancing climbing performance

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Daniel P. Heilen
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Colin Matthewen
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-25T18:37:11Z
dc.date.available2013-06-25T18:37:11Z
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.description.abstractEnhanced climbing performance may be achieved by applying systematic and documented principles to training for climbing. The purposes of this study were (a) to determine if improvements in climbing performance and related physiological variables would result from systematic training on a motorized climbing treadmill, and (b) to compare the effectiveness of two types of prescribed cardiovascular training programs on a motorized climbing treadmill: high-intensity interval training (HIT) and endurance training (ET). Climbing-related anthropometric variables, climbing performance, climbing-specific cardiorespiratory fitness, and climbing-related muscular strength and endurance were measured on 27 volunteers (13 males, 14 females) between the ages of 18 and 37 years, prior to and following six weeks of systematic physical training using a motorized climbing treadmill. Subjects were randomly assigned to training groups, which were similar with regard to gender and climbing experience. The ET program consisted of a single 20-minute bout of climbing at 65-80% of measured pre-test 2peak O for each workout session,; the HIT program consisted of three 6-minute bouts of climbing at 80-95% of measured pre-test 2peak O V & , separated by three minutes of standing rest, for each workout session. Following training, climbing performance tended to be higher as a result of the HIT program compared to the ET program (p = 0.069), while climbing performance was significantly improved following training as a result of either program. Climbing-specific cardiorespiratory fitness did not differ between groups following training. With the exception of hand-grip strength, climbing-related muscular strength and endurance were significantly higher following training, with no differences observed between groups. Small yet significant improvements in climbing-related anthropometric variables were observed following training in both groups with no differences between groups. The results of this study show that six weeks of systematic physical training using a motorized climbing treadmill is capable of improving climbing performance, climbing-related strength and endurance, and climbing-related anthropometric variables. It was concluded that systematic training on a motorized climbing treadmill can be an effective method of increasing climbing-specific fitness and improving climbing performance.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/1144en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Education, Health & Human Developmenten
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2004 by Colin Matthew Davisen
dc.subject.lcshRock climbingen
dc.subject.lcshTrainingen
dc.subject.lcshExerciseen
dc.subject.lcshTreadmill exercise testsen
dc.subject.lcshPhysiologyen
dc.titleA comparison of training methods for enhancing climbing performanceen
dc.typeThesisen
mus.relation.departmentHealth & Human Development.en_US
thesis.catalog.ckey1146645en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Mary P. Miles; Michael Hahnen
thesis.degree.departmentHealth & Human Development.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage154en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DavisC04.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.