Improving new patient cancer treatment education: a quality improvement project

Abstract

Background: A cancer diagnosis invokes high levels of uncertainty and anxiety. Healthcare professionals task themselves with providing appropriate education to help patients traverse their cancer treatment experience. Effective communication and educational interventions help patients acquire appropriate coping strategies to manage the disease process and reduce uncertainty. Purpose: This project aimed to improve patient satisfaction and decrease anxiety and uncertainty through an enhanced patient education process. The project took place in a rural outpatient oncology center. Participants included newly diagnosed oncology patients receiving intravenous (IV) chemotherapy/immunotherapy and clinic staff. Method: This project used the Demming Cycle quality improvement method. The education components drew on the guidance of literature reviewed for best practices and national guidelines for patient education and teaching techniques. Data obtained through surveys from patients and RNs, observations from the project lead, and additional feedback from staff informed the development of the education visit components. Intervention: A nurse education visit was scheduled the week before IV treatment started and included a learning needs assessment, clinic tour, education on port-a-cath care, regimen-specific side effects and self-management, and how and when to contact the healthcare team. Nurses provided content using the teach-back method. Results: Patient and staff completed surveys over six weeks of implementation. Sixteen patients completed surveys. 100% (n=16) were confident they could manage their symptoms at home after the education visit. Thematic findings from survey responses regarding the most valuable education piece included Theme 1, logistics of treatment; Theme 2, anticipated side effects and management; Theme 3, other value of knowledge and education regarding managing the disease process. Nine nurses were surveyed 17 times during the project, with each nurse completing 1 to 2 education sessions. 88% (n=17) of nurses surveyed felt the education visit improved from the previous system, and 71% (n=17) of nurses found the teach-back method was supportive of patient outcomes surrounding patient education. Conclusion: Providing a structured education visit for new oncology patients receiving chemotherapy/immunotherapy improved patient confidence in identifying and managing symptoms and side effects of therapy at home. The teach-back method reinforced the education content and demonstrated an understanding of the material.