Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nest survival and nest predator response to fence modifications in a grazing modified landscape

dc.contributor.advisorChairperson, Graduate Committee: Bok Sowellen
dc.contributor.authorO'Harra, Aaron Williamen
dc.contributor.otherThis is a manuscript style paper that includes co-authored chapters.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-26T14:19:08Z
dc.date.available2023-10-26T14:19:08Z
dc.date.issued2023en
dc.description.abstractLivestock operations are present across much of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus; sage-grouse) current range and the infrastructure associated with this land-use type can have negative effects on sage-grouse populations. Recent work has found that the daily survival rate of nests placed close to fences experience a 4-fold decrease in survival probability. The reduction in survival was theorized to be attributed to higher use of fences by predators due to increased movement efficiency and foraging rates predators experience along linear features. In this study, we experimentally modified fences to reduce perch availability and the barrier effects often associated with fences to improve sage-grouse nest survival. We monitored 177 nests over 8 years to assess the effectiveness of this management technique. We also used camera traps and point count surveys in the last 3 years of the study to assess the occurrence of three common sage-grouse nest predators; badgers (Taxidea taxus), coyotes (Canis latrans), and avian predators. We modeled daily nest survival against modified and traditional fences and landscape features throughout our study area in a Bayesian framework. Our predator occurrence rates were modeled using a single season occupancy model in relation to similar landscape features used for nest survival modeling. We detected evidence of an increase in nest survival of 11.4% (90% CRI: 3.2%, 20.0%) for sage grouse nests placed closer to modified fences (mean survival = 35.8%) when compared to traditional fence types (mean survival = 24.4%). We also found evidence for a 14% (95% CI: 5%, 23%) decrease in badger occurrence and a 15% (95% CI: 12%, 18%) increase in coyote occurrence along recently modified fences. We found no evidence that avian predators used fences more than areas with no fence present. Our results may be influenced by the distribution of fence types between sagebrush species. Our results indicate that predation risk for sage-grouse nests across a landscape is predator specific. We conclude that modifying fences in this way can improve sage-grouse nest survival, and the effectiveness of these modifications is controlled by a combination of the predators and landscape features associated with a nest site.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/17893
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMontana State University - Bozeman, College of Agricultureen
dc.rights.holderCopyright 2023 by Aaron William O'Harraen
dc.subject.lcshSage grouseen
dc.subject.lcshNestsen
dc.subject.lcshPredatory animalsen
dc.subject.lcshRange managementen
dc.titleGreater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nest survival and nest predator response to fence modifications in a grazing modified landscapeen
dc.typeThesisen
mus.data.thumbpage23en
thesis.degree.committeemembersMembers, Graduate Committee: Andrea Litt; Kyle Cutting; Mike Frisinaen
thesis.degree.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences.en
thesis.degree.genreThesisen
thesis.degree.nameMSen
thesis.format.extentfirstpage1en
thesis.format.extentlastpage97en

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
oharra-greater-2023.pdf
Size:
2 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nest survival and nest predator response to fence modifications in a grazing modified landscape (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.