Warm-Season Forage Options in Northern Dryland Regions

dc.contributor.authorCarr, Patrick M.
dc.contributor.authorBoss, Darrin L.
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chengci
dc.contributor.authorDafoe, Julia M.
dc.contributor.authorEberly, Jed O.
dc.contributor.authorFordyce, Simon
dc.contributor.authorHydner, Roger M.
dc.contributor.authorFryer, Heather K.
dc.contributor.authorLachowiec, Jennifer A.
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Peggy F.
dc.contributor.authorMcVay, Kent A.
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Qasim A.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Perry R.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Zachariah J.
dc.contributor.authorTorrion, Jessica A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T14:57:03Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T14:57:03Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractRotating summer fallow with wheat (Triticum spp.) is done in dryland grain farming at upper latitudes to stabilize yields over time and to prevent crop failure. However, summer fallow is costly since weeds must be controlled and crops are not grown. Replacing summer fallow with grain crops can generate low economic returns. Previous research indicated that annual cool‐season forages can be substituted for summer fallow in dryland cropping systems. Our objective was to determine if annual warm‐season species were suited for forage production in monocultures and polycultures in the U.S. northern Great Plains. Dry matter (DM) production by 20 warm‐ and cool‐season crop monocultures and 4 polycultures was determined across six environments during 2016, and by 25 warm‐ and cool‐season crop monocultures and polycultures across four environments from 2016 through 2018. Maize (Zea mays L.) monoculture produced forage DM in amounts equal to, or greater than, those produced by other warm‐ and cool‐season crop treatments (P < 0.05). Maize DM production averaged 2.5 to 5.7 Mg ha−1, depending on the study and environment. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.), foxtail millet [Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.] and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) also produced relatively large amounts of forage DM. Polycultures failed to produce more DM than monocultures consistently (P > 0.40). These results indicate that maize and other warm‐season crops are adapted for dryland forage production in cool regions at upper latitudes. Additional research is needed to determine the impacts of annual warm‐season forages on grain yield in a forage‐wheat crop sequence.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCarr, Patrick M., Darrin L. Boss, Chengci Chen, Julia M. Dafoe, Jed O. Eberly, Simon Fordyce, Roger M. Hydner, et al. “Warm‐season Forage Options in Northern Dryland Regions.” Agronomy Journal 112, no. 5 (June 30, 2020): 3239–3253. doi:10.1002/agj2.20261.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-1962
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/16357
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsThis is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [Carr, P.M., Boss, D.L., Chen, C., Dafoe, J.M., Eberly, J.O., Fordyce, S., Hydner, R.M., Fryer, H.K., Lachowiec, J.A., Lamb, P.F., et al. (2020). Warm‐season forage options in Northern Dryland Regions. Agronomy Journal.], which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20261. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.en_US
dc.titleWarm-Season Forage Options in Northern Dryland Regionsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
mus.citation.extentfirstpage3239en_US
mus.citation.extentlastpage3253en_US
mus.citation.issue5en_US
mus.citation.journaltitleAgronomy Journalen_US
mus.citation.volume112en_US
mus.data.thumbpage9en_US
mus.identifier.doi10.1002/agj2.20261en_US
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agricultureen_US
mus.relation.departmentLand Resources & Environmental Sciences.en_US
mus.relation.departmentPlant Sciences & Plant Pathology.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupCentral Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupEastern Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupNorthern Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupNorthwestern Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupSouthern Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.researchgroupWestern Ag Research Center.en_US
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozemanen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
carr-warm-season-forage.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Warm‐season forage options in Northern Dryland Regions (PDF)

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
826 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Copyright (c) 2002-2022, LYRASIS. All rights reserved.