Scholarship & Research
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/1
Browse
1 results
Search Results
Item Improvement of cervical cancer screening in a rural primary care setting: a quality improvement project(Montana State University - Bozeman, College of Nursing, 2024) Kelleher, Katie Carla; Chairperson, Graduate Committee: Amanda H. Lucas; This is a manuscript style paper that includes co-authored chapters.Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most diagnosed cancer among women. Cervical cancer screening (CCS) is a vital component of routine health care, as any individual with a cervix is at risk of developing cervical cancer, and nearly all diagnoses of aggressive cervical cancer are directly associated with a lack of screening, underscreening or inadequate follow-up of abnormal results. Unfortunately, the number of women overdue for CCS continues to increase gradually nationally and in Montana. Local Problem: At a rural primary healthcare clinic in northwestern Montana, 37.0% of patients have a current CCS completion documented, compared to Healthy People's 2030 benchmark of 84.3%. Methods: Participants included female patients ages 21-65 who presented to the clinical for an annual exam. Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle, the intervention outcomes were measured biweekly throughout the six-week initiative. Measures assessed included: Adequate CCS eligibility determination, proper CCS documentation with the EHR, and the overall site CCS completion percentage. Data was collected over six weeks, de-identified, and analyzed using percentages and bar graphs. Interventions: Literature supported a multifactorial approach to standardize workflows and documentation practices among the nurses and medical assistants (MA) through the provision of educational material and a CCS clinical decision tree. Key process changes included offering of same-day CCS screening, follow-up scheduling prior to the patient leaving, and EHR alert creation if patient records were requested. Results: A total of 30 patients presented to the clinic. 100% of patients who presented to the clinic were assessed for CCS eligibility. 100% of eligible patients were offered CCS. 84.6% of patients had correct CCS documentation by the staff within the EHR, with four patients lacking proper documentation. A 4.1% increase was seen in the overall facility CCS completion percentage, reaching a total CCS completion percentage of 41.1%. Conclusions: Implementing education, standardized workflows, and the use of the CCS clinical decision tree improved CCS documentation and completion rates.