Foraging Behavior, Botanical Composition, and Quality of Beef Cattle Diets on Burned Versus Unburned Foothill Rangelands

dc.contributor.authorKluth, Janessa A.
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Noah
dc.contributor.authorWyffels, Samuel A.
dc.contributor.authorMarlow, Clayton B.
dc.contributor.authorVermeire, Lance T.
dc.contributor.authorSitz, Taylre
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, Thomas G.
dc.contributor.authorDelCurto, Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-29T18:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2025-02
dc.description.abstractCurrent management paradigms suggest deferring grazing rangeland for two years post-fire to avoid additional stress on native grass species, but there is little research supporting these recommendations. This study was conducted within and adjacent to the burn area of a wildfire to evaluate the differences in diet quality, botanical composition, and foraging behavior of beef cattle on burned and unburned rangeland in the spring and fall of the year following a fire. Diet composition and masticate samples were collected during 20 min bite-count periods using six ruminally cannulated cows in burned and unburned sites in June and September. Diets differed between burned and unburned sites across seasons, but the differences were most apparent in June. Cattle grazed more selectively on burned sites in June, consuming a higher quality diet dominated by forbs. In September, cattle shifted to grass-dominated diets with fewer differences between burned and unburned sites. This indicates that the nutritional flush on post-fire rangelands may be minimized by the end of the first growing season post-fire. Additionally, in the first spring post-fire, cattle may shift grazing pressure away from vulnerable perennial native grass species to the early-seral forbs, commonly associated with the post-fire environment.
dc.identifier.citationKluth J, Davis NG, Wyffels SA, Marlow CB, Vermeire LT, Sitz TE, Hamilton TG, DelCurto T. Foraging Behavior, Botanical Composition, and Quality of Beef Cattle Diets on Burned Versus Unburned Foothill Rangelands. Grasses. 2025; 4(1):8. https://doi.org/10.3390/grasses4010008
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/grasses4010008
dc.identifier.issn2813-3463
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholarworks.montana.edu/handle/1/19799
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.rightscc-by
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectbeef cattle
dc.subjectbotanical composition
dc.subjectdiet quality
dc.subjectrangelands
dc.subjectwildfire
dc.titleForaging Behavior, Botanical Composition, and Quality of Beef Cattle Diets on Burned Versus Unburned Foothill Rangelands
dc.typeArticle
mus.citation.extentfirstpage1
mus.citation.extentlastpage9
mus.citation.issue1
mus.citation.journaltitleGrasses
mus.citation.volume4
mus.relation.collegeCollege of Agriculture
mus.relation.departmentAnimal & Range Sciences
mus.relation.universityMontana State University - Bozeman

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
kluth-beef-cattle-diets-2025.pdf
Size:
719.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
825 B
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: